Infanteer said:
There isn't anything else I can add (other than making my email account public, which I'd prefer not to do) given that I'm not yet in the military.
Infanteer said:
On September 10, 2001 most Americans would have laughed you off the stage if you would have talked about guys taking planes over and using them as cruise missiles to bring down two of the largest buildings in the United States (and cave in the side of the world's largest office building). By nature of our role in Afghanistan and our close relationship to the U.S. and Britain, we are targets for global Salafists driving the Islamic Insurgency; they've said it loud and clear, and these people usually say what they mean.
In a more general sense, give Samual Huntington's The Soldier and the State a read. Soldiers, and by extent the entire National Security Establishment, cannot afford to say "it's almost certainly not going to happen" because the day it does happen, all eyes and fingers will be upon us as to why we let it happen. You can't eliminate possibilities when the responsibility of "Standing on Guard for Thee" rests on your shoulders.
Never say never.
I only speak which such definite terms as a civilian, on conditions of anonymity. I would never do so in any professional context.
I'm sure Americans would disbelieve you if you were to foretell the September 11th attacks, but if you were merely to say that a terrorist attack would happen, and speak with no certain details, it would not be difficult to imagine, given the history of terrorist attacks against the United States from all manners of terrorists.
Kev T said:
I thought good ol' Osama clearly stated Canada as one of the countries he will attack. I don't think that's a statement to be just quietly brushed under the rug.
Osama bin Laden says a lot of things, most of his threats never pan out. As I noted, Canada is not a strategic target for terrorists, and would likely harm their cause more than it would do to benefit it.
career_radio-checker said:
So what does this mean? So he had images and info about Montreal's Metro system, he didn't act on them and he wasn't even prooven guilty of helping the bombings, right? If this article proves anything it's that Canada is not immune to attack and that targets within our borders are under the watchful eyes of foreign terrorists. Even if the guy wasn't convicted, I'd be suspicious of anyone who is even associated with a terrorist group.
I don't know why he would have had that information. If I were planning a terrorist attack, I'd try to accumulate as much information as possible, which would include schematics of similar targets for comparison purposes. Maybe he had it for htat purpose, maybe he had it as an alibi to say he was researching transit systems. I don't know. It's certainly cause for concern, but it's far from proof of a terrorist attack or an intended terrorist attack.
I've added more information to my profile, thanks for the advice.
Mack674 said:
Correct me if im wrong, but when OBL named off all the western countries he planned on having attacked, including Canada, arent we the last ones yet to be attacked now that Spain and Britain have been bombed?
Canada and Italy are yet to be attacked.
Mack674 said:
If terrorists wouldnt bother bombing anything in Canada, why are they bothering to shadow the public transit systems in Toronto and Montreal? ( I cant find a link to the news article, it was during the summer)
I guess theyre just doing it for fun :
Attacks take alot of planning and preparation, and its just a matter of time.Im not going to bother saying things like "i hope it never happens" because im absolutely convinced that its just a matter of time.
What proof of this exists?
Mack674 said:
As other posters have said, the extremists do not differentiate between us and the United States, they dont think about borders.They are out to bomb and attack the western nations.... they wouldnt attack Canada?
We share a border, are one of the US's biggest trading partners, we helped them invade Afghanistan, we're both part of NATO, our cultures have all kinds of similiarities, "we both drink coke and eat big macs" ...
To the terrorists, Canada represents all the same things the United States does.
"They have nothing to gain from attacking Canada."
They arent looking to gain anything, theyre looking to kill as many westerners as possible, and unfortunately, that includes us.
If they're looking to just kill as many westerners as possible, it's interesting that the vast majority of that they consistently attack American and British targets, while forsaking other western countries. The lowest level fundamentalist might just be out to kill any "infidel," but terrorist cells aren't. They're out to accomplish political objectives, and attacking Canada would only be a setback to them.
Mack674 said:
Also, in regards to the Spain attack, I dont think Canadians would act like the spaniards and want out military out of the middle east, although I could be wrong, I beleive the public reaction would be quite the opposite, and many many people would want to see action immediately.
Many people would want Canada to strengthen its military and take a more active role in fighting terrorism, but don't forget that the vast majority of Canadians vote Liberal or NDP. A lot of them are going to call for Canadian troops to be withdrawn from Afghanistan and many other overseas locations.
Wesley H. Allen said:
ROB - Adding a ZERO to your profile does nothing but show how much contempt you have for the members who asked you to do so in good faith. Doing such as just reinforced my thoughts of your actual intentions on this site, a sub-profesional shyte disturber!
That's the ticket; I added the "0" to my military experience section to insult the members who asked me to fill in my profile.
cobbler said:
Don't comment on things that you have absolutely no idea about. The muslim population in this country is treated with the same rights and dignity of every other group.
I almost certainly know more about this than you do. Australia is considered by many to be among the most racist countries in the developed world. It's probably the only developed country to keep illegal immigrants in concentration camps, which have been repeatedly criticized by NGOs and foreign governments. There's a lot of discontent for Australia among Muslims, aboriginals, Asian and Polynesians. In many instances, racism is considered by minorities to be a greater issue than it is by minorities in the United States.
Don't comment on things you have absolutely no idea about.
cobbler said:
Australia is hated by many Indonesians, simply because of who we are, a free, rich, democratic and proud nation. Our lead in East Timor only made things worse, the Indo media is so extremist and corrupt, they showed photos of dead Timorese civilians and said that they were killed by aussie troops, when in actual fact it was Indonesian army trained militia who killed them.
That's right, they hate you because you have democracy (they have democracy, too!)
That's just rhetoric.
If "many" Indonesians hate Australia just because you're rich, free, democratic and proud, how do you explain how nowhere near as many Mexicans hate America, and nowhere near as many Cubans hate Canada?
cobbler said:
We became a target because of Timor, and there is absolutely no doubt in anybodies mind that what we did there was justified, and needed for the protection of innocent timorese people.
Peacekeeping creates enemies too, just as many as war can, Canada says it is a nation of peacekeepers, so you can be sure that there are evil extremists out there wanting to grind their axe and use it on Canada. Simply denying that will only make things worse.
The US and Australia looked the other way when Indonesia invaded Timor. What did Australia do when 1/5 of the island's population was massacred? Nothing.
The US didn't even stop selling arms to Indonesia until after the end of the Cold War, and even then, it did so against the wishes of the President.
EDIT: Quote format problems corrected.