Malmo Sweden the same, Parts of Paris, dittoBritain ignored the issue and now London is pretty much overrun with radical islamists and Hamas leaders. We aren’t too far behind, there are already open demonstrations in support of terror in Canada.
Malmo Sweden the same, Parts of Paris, dittoBritain ignored the issue and now London is pretty much overrun with radical islamists and Hamas leaders. We aren’t too far behind, there are already open demonstrations in support of terror in Canada.
I think he was threatening someone else, it looked like police were keeping a dividing line between the protest group and either bystanders or counter protesters.How do get away with openly threatening to kill a police officer??????
Honestly I see that answer as a bit of a cop out (pun intended). To retain public order sometimes one needs to act with speed, surprise and violence of action.I think he was threatening someone else, it looked like police were keeping a dividing line between the protest group and either bystanders or counter protesters.
Look at the tactical situation the couple officers are in there. With what we’re limited to seeing, to me that’s not the circumstances to try to force an arrest. You’re probably just going to end up with a brawl and potentially much greater harm, and you probably won’t be succesful in the arrest either. There’s video everywhere; if possible you try to ID for subsequent arrest and charges when they’re no longer in the powder keg. Sometimes in a public order situation you have to accept that not everything will be actionable and some people will get away with some stuff. This is a very volatile situation in a crappy setting.
Get it right - they were resisting!!!Honestly I see that answer as a bit of a cop out (pun intended). To retain public order sometimes one needs to act with speed, surprise and violence of action.
I’m of the experience that very few people will actively resist an aggressive Police action - especially if they know they are going to get hickory shampoo’d if they do.
No, but pretty much any offense not involving actual immediate injury may not be wise to try to enforce in the moment.
Honestly I see that answer as a bit of a cop out (pun intended). To retain public order sometimes one needs to act with speed, surprise and violence of action.
I’m of the experience that very few people will actively resist an aggressive Police action - especially if they know they are going to get hickory shampoo’d if they do.
A couple of additional observations.
The clip is about 6 minutes long. By the end of the clip there seemed to be about two dozen uniforms on the scene and they had started to form containment lines. This apparently caused some angst among the youngsters. They were contained by elders.
The second observation was the use of a woman with a stroller to break the containment. The woman with the stroller approached one of the lines looking to pass. One of the elders, complete with shemagh and flag, claimed the children as his and asked for them all to be let through. The containment was disrupted and other young women then asked that they also be allowed to pass and were denied.
Women and children first is a thing.
I’m of the experience that very few people will actively resist an aggressive Police action - especially if they know they are going to get hickory shampoo’d if they do.
I hope that for future protests, police posture is ramped up so that they can act more decisively.
The War on Christmas was fought in Ottawa yesterday.
Jesus was a Palestinian
This just looks like healthy diversity to me, it's going to make our country a world leader something something. Pretty soon the government will be full diverse and this will be normal, we just aren't a 3rd world country yet.
Boiling frog?No, but pretty much any offense not involving actual immediate injury may not be wise to try to enforce in the moment.
What are you talking about? I’m clearly not siding with the conduct. I’m taking about purely tactical decisions about whether, in the moment, something can be enforced sufficiently effectively and sufficiently safely for police and the public for the juice to be worth the squeeze, in the bigger picture of what’s going on overall. You’re well outside your arcs on this one.Boiling frog?
Is this protesting, or is it denying others’ right to freely pass without threatening acts that, for the moment, seem explainable as ‘just words’…
We're probably only a couple of major incidents away from Gangs of New YorkThis just looks like healthy diversity to me, it's going to make our country a world leader something something. Pretty soon the government will be full diverse and this will be normal, we just aren't a 3rd world country yet.
What the establishment has to avoid is the appearance of taking the side of protestors.
Aaaaand there it is.
As this Italian politician found out a while backNo, he was a Jew from Nazareth ...