- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 430
And landing is much harder then taking off.....you want to risk your E2C that way?
Do you want "Monster Size" AOR's? They seem to be high profile targets for cheap weapons systems that the bad guys are really getting their mitts on (Anti-Shipping Missiles, Cheap Diesel-Electric Subs). On well placed Silkworm and the whole concept goes down the tube.
whiskey 601 said:Heck no ... I still prefer the C17 carrying Imperial Star Destroyer. The reality is we better get our frigate fleet and AAD in order before we put anything else in the water beyond the JSS.
Now since you and others floated some ideas (Which I took shots at), it would be proper if I too floated my "ideas". If the JSS project's funds are what we are "playing with", I'd jump onto the American AOE-X program with the aim of purchasing three vessels, then with my remaining funds, purchase or lease (depending on what i have left over) "USNS like" 55K + ton Ro/Ros.
OK DJL, the naval types have convinced me. The only way we are going to get troops, (which we have), guns (which we have), LAVs (which we have) and ammunition (which we could conceivably buy) to someplace where they might be useful is to get the PMs son's to lease us 3 or 4 RoRos. Would it be asking the Navy too much to offer a couple of frigates as escort?
canuck101 said:Would the The Sachsen Class (F124) is Germany's Air Defence Frigate be a good choice to replace the 280's
Kirkhill said:OK. If you get your Area Air Defence Destroyer, can I get my LSD(A)s?
canuck101 said:Here is the link to see the The Sachsen Class (F124) Germany's Air Defence Frigate
http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/f124/index.html
canuck101 said:So true they are having a hard time building there own ships if we had to go off shore i would go German or Dutch they seem able to build ships that work. the combined surface ship seem good but we will be without air defence ships for around 8 to 10 years.