- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 210
I noticed that too, The Americans seem to need a lot of incentives to join. Such as a very well publicized subsidized education. That is one reason the US Army seems a little "newbish" in Iraq in my opinion. They have a lot of young guys and girls who only joined for money for college. So says an "American History" teacher( he used to be in the Navy, a little soggy around the midsection now though...), when he said that, I thought, "well, that would make sense".
Every friggen commercial the US Army has out now revolves around getting a further education, or joining the Army to something other than to Fight (are they trying to hide the main theme, and history of the military?).
However, here in Canada the forces are not advertised too much, and the first I read about the subsidized education was on the Forces website. Canada is more professional because people join to serve Canada a profession, not themselves. Same with the Brits.
I greatly prefer the "Duty with honour" approach, Maybe it is because I prefer to serve, benefit others, and do something. I feel that our slogan evokes more pride, and in some cases emotion.
I'm 16, so I know I am not as knowledgeable in the military arena as many of the people on this site, But I do not want to join the CF only for myself, I want to serve. Of course a subsidized education is good, and I could make use of it, but it is not my primary source of draw to the Forces.
I have wanted to join since I was knee high to a grasshopper, but unlike some kids it was not because I wanted to have a gun and shoot people, for me it is almost an indescribable thing. I have a hunch there are several people here who feel the same thing.
Anyway, back to the topic... I would love to see more enrolments, and more advertising, But that may require more people joining now to dignify putting more money into the system. But then again, with out advertising, we are missing quite a few opportunities...Hmmmm... A possible dilemma, no?
Take a pro-active stance and risk it, or wait for a opportunity and probably risk even more. I choose Pro-Active.
Hows aboot Operation PEEP (Pro-active Enrolment Encouraging Program)?
Every friggen commercial the US Army has out now revolves around getting a further education, or joining the Army to something other than to Fight (are they trying to hide the main theme, and history of the military?).
However, here in Canada the forces are not advertised too much, and the first I read about the subsidized education was on the Forces website. Canada is more professional because people join to serve Canada a profession, not themselves. Same with the Brits.
I greatly prefer the "Duty with honour" approach, Maybe it is because I prefer to serve, benefit others, and do something. I feel that our slogan evokes more pride, and in some cases emotion.
I'm 16, so I know I am not as knowledgeable in the military arena as many of the people on this site, But I do not want to join the CF only for myself, I want to serve. Of course a subsidized education is good, and I could make use of it, but it is not my primary source of draw to the Forces.
I have wanted to join since I was knee high to a grasshopper, but unlike some kids it was not because I wanted to have a gun and shoot people, for me it is almost an indescribable thing. I have a hunch there are several people here who feel the same thing.
Anyway, back to the topic... I would love to see more enrolments, and more advertising, But that may require more people joining now to dignify putting more money into the system. But then again, with out advertising, we are missing quite a few opportunities...Hmmmm... A possible dilemma, no?
Take a pro-active stance and risk it, or wait for a opportunity and probably risk even more. I choose Pro-Active.
Hows aboot Operation PEEP (Pro-active Enrolment Encouraging Program)?