- Reaction score
- 3,106
- Points
- 1,160
And the Kitchen Ninja could liquefy pretty much anything else available at the drive through, too... ;D
Kat Stevens said:And the Kitchen Ninja could liquefy pretty much anything else available at the drive through, too... ;D
Kat Stevens said:And the Kitchen Ninja could liquefy pretty much anything else available at the drive through, too... ;D
George Wallace said:But they are not. They gave away the "sovereign nation" status with Treaties # 5 and # 9. If they want to conveniently forget this "sin of their forefathers" then we should not be held accountable of any of the "sins of our forefathers" (which they (all visible minorities) so often remind us of and hold us accountable for), and we are left with this:
From Treaty No. 5, 20 September 1875:
http://www.aadnc-aandc.gc.ca/eng/1100100028699/1100100028700
From Treaty No 9, 18 June 1931:
http://www.aadnc-aandc.gc.ca/eng/1100100028863/1100100028864
Hatchet Man said:That last article brings up an interesting concept, one I don't think has been discussed here, or been taken into account by many in the INM and their associated hangers on. And that is the whole concept of a higher non-WASP immigrant population that has no history or connection to any of this mess, and despite what some naysayers say and think, work their butts off to eek out a barely middle class existence. I can see how they might not look to favourably on handing out billions (of their money) without proper accounting of it, and see it is being pissed away. They might even start voicing their displeasure to their elected officials, and as their numbers grow, those officials might actually start listening since their prospects of re-election could very well depend on it.
Thoughts ?
Retired AF Guy said:Excellent point. Sixty per cent of people living in Toronto are of immigrant background, so when they see their lives being disrupted by native protests they are, like you state, will voice their displeasure. Not good news for Liberal's/NDP who are supportive of the native protests.
Larry Strong said:Treaty #5 and #9 deal with the James Bay area and Manitoba with small bits of Ontario and Saskatchewan respectively. Have the Alberta natives ceded their lands as well? If so what Treaties were they?
My Google-fu does not seem to be working for me today and I can't find any answers.
Thanks
Larry
ObedientiaZelum said:It doesn't matter. Their allinfidelssettlers. (sounds familiar)
Retired AF Guy said:A map of the different treaties as they pertain to the prairie provinces.
Source: Loyal till Death: Indians and the North-West Rebellion. By Blair Stonechild and Bill Waiser
Larry Strong said:An ordinary citizen also went to counter protest:
http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/sunnews/canada/archives/2013/01/20130116-170014.html
Larry
ballz said:They really make it sound like he needs their permission to stand there peacefully with his sign. Unbelievable.
EDIT to add: He wasn't exactly making the most compelling argument either ("the Jews got over it") but as soon as they started with their nonsense they just embarrass themselves without his help.
Larry Strong said:He - the civie - should have had all his counter points ready before he showed up in my view.
ballz said:An Edmonton woman drove through the blockade (today I think). Yeah, real peaceful crowd...
http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid868989705001?bckey=AQ~~,AAAAybGjzqk~,6NfTc6c241GVQxOh-GBHNHu5Cuhlf-y9&bctid=2098845632001
"You're gonna kill someone" No shit, then get the fuck off the road.
The first thing to remember about the Idle No More blockade that kinda, sorta happened on the QEII highway just south of town on Wednesday is that the group behind it - the Papaschase First Nation - isn't even a real aboriginal band.
If anything, Papaschase is an air band - existing only in thin air. It has a chief, but no reserve. Even the Supreme Court of Canada has rejected its attempt to file a land claim. Yet there they were disrupting the busiest highway in the province.
Like much of the Idle movement, the Papaschase grievances are largely illusory. Yet that didn't stop them from trying to harass, delay and generally annoy tens of thousands of law-abiding Albertans.
The ancestors of today's Papaschase complainants signed away their reserve in the late 1880s. Of the 10 families on the reserve (which covered most of current southeast Edmonton) in 1886, seven - including the chief - gave up their claims in return for a cash payment. Most moved to the Enoch reserve west of town or drifted away.
The remaining three families agreed to be bought out in 1889.
Much of present-day Edmonton south of Whitemud Drive, including the drive itself, is on what was once Papaschase land.
Roughly, the old reserve ran from 51st Avenue in the north to Ellerslie Road on the south, and from 122nd Street in the west to 34th Street in the east - a large (and valuable) chunk of the city. It includes Southgate Mall, Mill Woods Town Centre and South Edmonton Common, the newest leg of Anthony Henday Drive and four high schools, Harry Ainlay, Louis St. Laurent, Holy Trinity and J. Percy Page.
Roughly 175,000 Edmontonians today live on what was once Papaschase land. But the operative word is "was."
The "band" was not seeking a return of its land. Rather it wanted compensation of a mere $2.5 billion.
However, in 2008, the Supreme Court ruled the current group of aboriginals who claim to be descendants of Chief Papaschase could not file a land claim. The justices were unanimous in their decision