• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Election 2011

Here, reproduced under the Fair Dealing provisions (§29) of the Copyright Act from ThreeHundredEight.com, is the week four wrap up and the “ceiling” projections:

http://www.threehundredeight.blogspot.com/
SATURDAY, APRIL 23, 2011
Week 4 Ceilings

This fourth week of the campaign has been, without a doubt, the most interesting. We've seen polls flail wildly but what has been unmistakable is that the NDP is making some gains - some huge gains.

Up to this point, I only looked at the ceilings of the Conservatives and the Liberals. One reason was in order to save some time, but the main reason was because the ceilings give us some ability to answer two important questions: can the Conservatives form a majority? Can the Liberal form a minority?

But after receiving many, many requests for NDP ceilings and in light of the NDP's gains, I think a third interesting question deserves an answer: can the NDP form the Official Opposition?

The ceilings are established by taking the best regional results for each party from all of the polls released during the week, and running seat projections with those results. Of course, these calculations are greatly influenced by the smaller samples of regional polls. But we can still draw some useful information from these ceilings, as it is unlikely that the parties are capable of outpacing the best polls when you consider that the best polls are likely a few points higher than reality thanks to the MOE.

Before getting to the NDP, let's take a look at the Conservative ceiling. It does provide a glimpse of one potential consequence of the NDP's gains, and that is a Conservative majority.

Based on receiving 45% of the vote nationally (48% in British Columbia, 72% in Alberta, 62% in the Prairies, 46% in Ontario, 24% in Quebec, and 44% in Atlantic Canada) the Conservative ceiling is 170 seats, or a comfortable majority government.

This is a drop of eight seats since last week, but is generally where the Tories have been since the start of the campaign. The Conservatives win 24 seats in British Columbia, 28 in Alberta, 24 in the Prairies, 61 in Ontario, 15 in Quebec, and 17 in Atlantic Canada.

The Liberals, with 61 seats, still form the Official Opposition while the New Democrats, with 43 seats, take third-party spot. The Bloc is reduced to 33 seats, while one independent is elected.

The poll used for Quebec featured a real four-way split (28% NDP, 27% BQ, 24% CPC, 20% LPC) and demonstrates how wonky that can be in a first-past-the-post system: 33 seats for the Bloc, 15 each for the Liberals and Conservatives, and 11 for the NDP. 

The Liberal ceiling is based on 31% national support (34% in British Columbia, 22% in Alberta, 23% in the Prairies, 37% in Ontario, 24% in Quebec, and 41% in Atlantic Canada). With this level of support, the Liberals would win 91 seats, 10 fewer than their ceiling from last week and very far from a minority.

The Liberals win 11 seats in British Columbia, one in Alberta, four in the Prairies, 38 in Ontario, 18 in Quebec, and 18 in Atlantic Canada.

With 138 seats, the Conservatives still outpace the combined total of the Liberals and NDP (35). The Bloc, with 43 seats, retains third-party standing.

Ceilings.PNG


And now the New Democrats. It's been a stellar week, and though I haven't gone back to run the numbers I can say with confidence that we wouldn't have seen anything close to this week's ceiling for the NDP earlier in the campaign.

With 29% of the vote (32% in British Columbia, 22% in Alberta, 35% in the Prairies, 24% in Ontario, 36% in Quebec, and 38% in Atlantic Canada), the New Democrats would win 83 seats. Yes, that's right. They would win 11 in British Columbia, two in Alberta, eight in the Prairies, 19 in Ontario, 31 in Quebec, and 11 in Atlantic Canada. It would be about twice their historic best.

The Conservatives would still win 145 seats and have first crack at a minority government. The Liberals would be reduced to 50 seats while the Bloc Québécois would win only 30. Jack Layton becomes the Leader of the Official Opposition, and the first man the Governor-General turns to if the Conservatives are unable to get a Throne Speech or budget passed.

The NDP's numbers west of Quebec are not outlandish, but those in Quebec and in Atlantic Canada are a bit of a stretch. Or are they? The NDP certainly has been up in the polls in Quebec and it isn't unusual to imagine Atlantic Canadians jumping on the bandwagon.

This scenario has the NDP winning the most seats in Quebec, but even if we prune that back a little to 20 seats and cut their Atlantic Canadian gains in half, we still have a scenario where the NDP forms the Official Opposition. So this possibility isn't based solely on a rogue poll.

Ceilings+Tracker.PNG


The chart above shows how the Conservatives have been holding steady, and how the Liberals' hopes have diminished as the campaign goes on. The New Democrats' best-case-scenario before the campaign was only 45 seats, and in Week 4 they stand ready to supplant the Liberals. It is really quite remarkable.

Week 5 will be determinant. Has the NDP peaked too soon? Will the sort of pull-back we have often seen when the Conservatives have approached majority territory happen to the NDP? It's possible many former Bloc and Liberal supporters will return to the fold once they see that their traditional parties are about to be humiliated.

Or, will voters now see the NDP as the alternative and flock to the orange banner? This campaign was supposed to be a snorer, but instead it looks like it could be the most surprising finish since 1993.

There is a still a week and a day to go, and, as I keep saying, Harold Wilson was right:

harold_wilson.jpg
A week is a loooooooong time in politics.
Harold Wilson, PM of the UK -
1964 to 1970 & 1974 to 1976

 
Taking a look at the regional polling trends is also instructive. The topography of the polls seen in the graphic below, shows a convergence of the NDP and Liberal votes in BC, Prairies, and Maritime areas. This convergence likely bodes well for the Conservatives. Torries are less likely to switch their votes to Lib or NDP. The reverse is not entirely true. There are a good number of Liberals who might switch to Conservative rather than NDP. The closer the Libs/NDP are, the more likely they'll split the vote and the Torries will be the beneficiaries. If one looks closer at BC, it may illustrate disaffected Liberals moving towards the Torries more than toward the NDP.


http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-bIuBqi35U-g/TbHM3zAGQVI/AAAAAAAAE5A/le6m7YKchJk/s1600/Region+Polls.PNG
which is reproduced under the Fair Dealing provisions (§29) of the Copyright Act from ThreeHundredEight.com

Region+Polls.PNG
 
Journeyman said:
I too hit the Advanced Polls yesterday, so all this electioneering is for naught.  ;)
...


I, too, voted at the advance poll. Even though I am about 99.9% certain that my candidate will finish third, behind NDP incumbent (and potential party leader) Paul Dewar and an unknown Liberal, every vote does matter as long as (too much) public funding for political parties remains the rule.

sqdewarBRU_0276.jpg

Paul Dewar, MP (Ottawa Centre)

So, even if you don't like your preferred party's candidate or, perhaps, leader, it is still important to cast your vote for your preferred party's fund.

Advance polls are open for a few more hours today and again on Mon. Election day is Mon, 2 May 11.

 
OMG, Jack Layton could become PM... :o

A decade of darkness, part 2 will be opening in theaters everywhere after the Speech from the Throne.
 
Thucydides said:
OMG, Jack Layton could become PM... :o

A decade of darkness, part 2 will be opening in theaters everywhere after the Speech from the Throne.

When they downsized the forces last century. did it mean a bunch of Ocdts getting fired? Just asking.
 
Inky said:
When they downsized the forces last century. did it mean a bunch of Ocdts getting fired? Just asking.

Not as far as I can recall, and I was a junior officer during the Sixties when most of the chopping occurred.
 
Inky said:
When they downsized the forces last century. did it mean a bunch of Ocdts getting fired? Just asking.

I think they released a graduating class or two at RMC.  Consolation was a free education.
 
Dennis Ruhl said:
I think they released a graduating class or two at RMC.  Consolation was a free education.

"I think".  I think that if you don't know then don't speculate or start rumours. 
 
An interesting thing to do after the election will be to see how these poll numbers, which translate into popular support, translate into seats.  I believe the general trends of the polls are pointing us in the right direction, but "25%" could equal 90 seats or 9 seats, depending on where your numbers are.

If the numbers are in Harper's favour, the NDP gains on the Libs/BQ will definately count for some "up the middle" gains.
 
No graduating classes at RMC were ever released wholesale.  In the mid 90s, during FRP, there were limited numbers permitted to release (by choice) and regulations requring payback were waived.  However, it such releases were voluntary, not mandatory.
 
Some commentators, including those who are, broadly, pro-Conservative, are worried about the changes that are being have been made in campaigning, as evidenced by this article by John Ibbitson, which is reproduced under the Fair Dealing provisions (§29) of the Copyright Act from the  Globe and Mail:

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/ottawa-notebook/ignatieff-a-master-of-delivery-but-whos-listening/article1996712/
Ignatieff a master of delivery, but who’s listening?

JOHN IBBITSON
Summerside, P.E.I.— Globe and Mail Update

Posted on Sunday, April 24, 2011

The contrast is remarkable. Stephen Harper, the veteran, still relies on a teleprompter to help recite a speech so tightly scripted that reporters at the back of the room mouth the words in unison.

Michael Ignatieff, the rookie, bounds onto the stage, shirtsleeves rolled up, grabs a wireless mike and proceeds to give an unscripted barn-burner that had this writer shaking his head in admiration.

And yet none of it gets past the room.

Despite his inspiring message, his passionate delivery, his casual mastery of the art of the stump speech – a form he knew little about not that long ago – Michael Ignatieff can’t make his message heard to save his life. Or maybe he can, but people aren’t buying.

Or maybe the campaign rally – designed to encourage the party faithful to greater effort while delivering a political party’s core message to voters via broadcast and print – is losing its relevance in an age of attack ads and social media. If so, Mr. Ignatieff may be remembered as a skilled practitioner of a dying art.

Sunday’s afternoon rally in Prince Edward Island introduced a new element to the Ignatieff stump speech: frank criticism of the NDP. With only one week of campaigning left, the third national party is showing alarming signs of becoming the second one. Mr. Ignatieff pleaded with voters to reconsider.

“We’ve got to the exciting part of this election, the part where we have to choose,” he told about 300 enthused supporters who gathered in the only Prince Edward Island riding, Egmont, that went Conservative in 2008. “This is no time for amateur hour, here,” he pleaded “...The NDP has had a free ride...It’s a nice little taxi to get on for a while, but you’d better take a look at how high that meter’s running...”

“Don’t go there, folks. This is not wise.”

Then it’s back to laying into the Conservatives – deriding Mr. Harper’s claims that anything less than a Conservative majority will lead to a coalition of the other parties – “Don’t treat the Canadian people like fools. You gotta persuade them, you can’t bully them” – raging against “fat cat” corporate tax cuts, and promoting the Liberal agenda of help for home care, college tuition, pensions – “the middle class Canadian family. That is our priority.”

He concludes by explaining the path he walked toward understanding what it means to be prime minister.

“We went to Stanley Bridge wharf, and we went out with a fisherman, and we went out to that breakwater...it’s just falling apart, the harbour’s silting up. And you begin to see what you have a government for...I want to be the prime minister for that fisherman. I want to get that wharf fixed.”

That may be the great strength and weakness of Mr. Ignatieff’s message. Its simple eloquence also conveys both self-absorption and a basic lack of political acumen.

He had to get out with a fisherman and look at a breakwater before he understood what prime ministers do?

He remains buoyant. The voters are stirring, he tells the crowd. Even this late, they’re ready to move.

“Slowly but surely the country is rising up,” he invokes. “Slowly but surely the country knows what it wants to do. It wants to change this government.”

He will keep saying it, extraordinarily well, even if into the void.


As someone old enough to remember John Diefenbaker's speeches and to have digested some of what St Laurent wrote and said, I, too, am sad to see politics reduced to carefully crafted 'sound bites' composed by unseen communications specialists and tested on 'focus groups.' But I also recognize that most Canadians get most of their information, for now, anyway, from the TV – which created the “sound bite,” after all, and we may be moving to a different, even more demanding media – social networking and YouTube and the like.

It is too bad that more Canadians cannot see the remarkable and remarkably broad intelligence that Stephen Harper, Michael Ignatieff, Jack Layton and others possess, but PM Harper, at least, is just obeying the rules that we, the consumers of political messages, have written by our choice of media.
 
Here is another projection, this time from LISPOP at Wilfred Laurier University:

http://www.wlu.ca/lispop/seatprojections.html
Tsunami in Quebec
     
The following seat projection is based upon a blended and weighted sample of polls from Ekos, Forum research, Ipsos, Nanos and CROP (Quebec only) conducted between April 18-20. Approximately 8000 respondents are included in the aggregate figures. Quebec has marked what has been one of the most dramatic transformations of public opinion in memory, after a very static period covering the election's first three weeks. The Quebec NDP increase of 14% in a week and 20% since the last election, accompanied by a BQ decline of 10% since 2008 is historic, and suggests that the seat projection for the province is much more tenuous than usual. The model has applied the swing evenly throughout the province, and accordingly might understate NDP gains. If we were able to detect subregional patterns of NDP strength in the swing, the party might have been allocated more seats. The New Democrats also had some gains in the west, notably BC, but the Conservatives rebounded from recent slippage in Ontario.

Projected distribution of seats by party and region, released April 22, 2011

conservativelogo.jpg
 
liberallogo.gif
 
ndplogo.gif
 
bqlogo.jpg
 
  149        68              52          39

Note:

The "regional swing model" is more fully explained in a paper originally prepared and presented by Dr. Barry Kay to the 1990 annual meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, entitled "Improving Upon the Cube Law: A Regional Swing Model for Converting Canadian Popular Vote into Parliamentary Seats". It should be noted that the application of the model above does not make use of the "incumbency effect" described in that paper. In tests for past elections, using late campaign polls to project electoral outcomes, the model has proved to be accurate within an average of four seats per party since 1963. Readers interested in post-dictions for past federal elections dating back to 1963, for projections using pre-election polls dating back to the 1980 federal election and for three Ontario provincial elections, may contact me at bkay@wlu.ca.

Readers can compare this projections with the 22 Apr 11 one from ThreeHundredEight.com:

11-04-22.PNG

Source: http://www.threehundredeight.blogspot.com/


Edit: format
 
If the NDP get official opposition, it could be a win-win for Retired members as National Defence will still be on track and some pressure for the clawback arguement.


Randall Garrison NDP Esquimalt Juan de Fuca
randallgarrison.ndp.ca | Phone: 250 590-7160
Find Randall on twitter and facebook
or visit the office at 1006 Craigflower Rd.
Excerpt from 2011 NDP Platform
6.5 Fulfilling Commitments to Honour our Veterans (Page 21)
• We will respect Canada’s obligations to our military veterans by:
·· Ending the unfair reduction of pensions for retired and disabled Canadian
Forces and RCMP veterans;
·· Stopping the unjust cuts to the Service Income Security Insurance Plan (SISIP)
for medically released members of the Canadian Forces and former RCMP
members. Ending these claw-backs will improve the lives of over 100,000
veterans in Canada;
·· Overhauling the Veterans Review and Appeal Board; appointing its members
from military, RCMP and medical personnel, and ensuring that veterans’ appeals
are fairly reviewed by their peers;
·· Introducing a “Helmets-to-Hardhats” program to help veterans transition to
construction and shipbuilding trades;
·· Responding to veterans’ organizations, spouses and widows, and others and
initiating a public inquiry into toxic chemical defoliation at CFB Gagetown.
 
Helmets to Hardhats eh? Sounds like a great idea, where have I heard that before? Oh yeah, the Conservative budget that the NDP voted against...
 
mad dog 2020 said:
If the NDP get official opposition, it could be a win-win for Retired members....
While a nice theory, I suspect there'd be a very long line of unionized sacred cows, with both hands into the dole trough, ahead of any DND/Veteran-related programmes.
 
Journeyman said:
While a nice theory, I suspect there'd be a very long line of unionized sacred cows, with both hands into the dole trough, ahead of any DND/Veteran-related programmes.

For sure . . .  that sound you hear is all those unionized sacred cows practicing their entitlement lip-lock they hope to have on the public teat.
 
Looking for the elusive full cup in theory.  I already voted in the advanced poll and you can just guess which way  :cdn:  However I keep getting this propaganda from ORGs (Old retired Guys{like me}),who get this carrot from their local NDP candidate.  We will see 2 May, I justpray it ain't Prince Iggy of Harvard as I too was in for the 20/40 plan and saw the decade of darkness. 
Wouldn't it be nice to bring back YTEP for an election point and youth employment.
 
I did my own little mathematical exercise yesterday using the vote ceilings. Here's my results. Accepting that there's no best case scenario data for the Bloc, I don't believe they'll loose 22 seats, but they could realistically lose half that number.


Conservatives:  151 (143)
Liberals:            67 (77)
NDP:                54 (36)
Bloc:                35 (47)
Independent:      1  (5 including vacancies)


In the end, I expect the NDP will gain 20 seats, at the expense of both the Liberals and Bloc. Likely 12 in Quebec, and 8 elsewhere. They might pick some up from the Torries, but that will probably be a 1 for 1 exchange somewhere else. I don't think the Independent will be Green, but Ms May could yet surprise us.
 
ModlrMike said:
I did my own little mathematical exercise yesterday using the vote ceilings. Here's my results. Accepting that there's no best case scenario data for the Bloc, I don't believe they'll loose 22 seats, but they could realistically lose half that number.


Conservatives:  151 (143)
Liberals:            67 (77)
NDP:                54 (36)
Bloc:                35 (47)
Independent:      1  (5 including vacancies)


In the end, I expect the NDP will gain 20 seats, at the expense of both the Liberals and Bloc. Likely 12 in Quebec, and 8 elsewhere. They might pick some up from the Torries, but that will probably be a 1 for 1 exchange somewhere else. I don't think the Independent will be Green, but Ms May could yet surprise us.

There's already one Independent seating and that's a guy in Quebec who is so pro-Conservative the Conservatives are not even bothering to run a candidate against him. If he gets re-elected, there's your Independent.
 
If the conservatives were to get within 2 or three seats of a maority, could they possibly count on a few defections from red tories?
 
Back
Top