- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 210
I thought pretty much about the same thing
as in "this would be a convenient way to get rid of a CDS"
as in "this would be a convenient way to get rid of a CDS"
which would serve the purpose even better ...Crantor said:Or fall on his own sword and step down. Knowing the character of this gentleman I could see that.
dapaterson said::facepalm:
This CDS was installed on 02 July 2008; his tenure right now stands at 3 years, 2 months and 14 days. The CDS serves "at pleasure", but generally for a 3 year term. Gen Hillier served under 3 1/2 years; his predecessor, Gen Henault, served just over 3 1/2 years.
Thus, by this time next year it's very likely we'll have a new CDS - he'll have served out his term.
No need for conspiracy theory here. Journalists writing about Access to Information Act request results is pretty routine - and not just recently:Jim Seggie said:Wondering who would have tipped the media to this? or am I just another conspiracy theory wannabe?
cupper said:Even paranoids are right some of the time.
Zoomie said:The media always adds a cost factor to these jets. There is no extra cost to the tax-payer for flying crown assets. The fuel, salary, oil, etc is already budgeted and paid in advance. If the CDS didn't fly those hours on the jet, the crew would have just taken it empty and gotten their currency training (ie cross-countries) by flying elsewhere. A little research would go a long way way.
Zoomie said:The media always adds a cost factor to these jets. There is no extra cost to the tax-payer for flying crown assets. The fuel, salary, oil, etc is already budgeted and paid in advance. If the CDS didn't fly those hours on the jet, the crew would have just taken it empty and gotten their currency training (ie cross-countries) by flying elsewhere. A little research would go a long way way.
The unified theory of journalism from the outside looking in.E.R. Campbell said:I think we need to realize that Challenger use/cost is always an issue and a good story. Gen Natynczyk is a well known public figure - better known that many (most?) cabinet ministers. Mix a well known guy, with a reliable 'news' story, add a good solid dose of "gotcha journalism", and then add just a pinch of anti-military bias and you have the Good Grey Globe's story.
Zoomie said:The media always adds a cost factor to these jets. There is no extra cost to the tax-payer for flying crown assets. The fuel, salary, oil, etc is already budgeted and paid in advance. If the CDS didn't fly those hours on the jet, the crew would have just taken it empty and gotten their currency training (ie cross-countries) by flying elsewhere. A little research would go a long way way.
My guess: there's a spokesperson quoted in the original CTV story, so that was probably one of the questions - "what was happening in St. Maarten that the CDS had to be flown there?" Interesting how the first CTV story included that, but NOT the fact that the CDS was called away to a repatriation (that was added in a later version).hamiltongs said:What stands out about this one is the bit about the trip to St Maarten's to "catch a cruise"; it wouldn't at all surprise me to learn that there was a service obligation associated with that trip as well (DND's Proactive Disclosure site shows the CDS was in Jamaica, Guatemala and Honduras in the weeks surrounding the date in question), but where did the media outlet get the bit of information about the cruise? Surely the flight logs didn't reveal that, so what did?