Well said.
We are entering a new era of warfare, absolutely. I believe that era has already started, and we have just been lucky enough to be observers thus far. That new era, from a weapons & munitions perspective, is going to complicate the battlespace and make it even more dangerous than it already was.
More types of munitions, being deployed by more varied systems, that can be employed right at the individual or section level. And, thus, will require an equal number of countermeasures.
One broad aspect is that it will give a smaller force a significantly more dangerous punch when operating against larger forces - or has the potential to, anyway. And vice versa, if the larger force is employing these new tools and concepts effectively, it will make the fight even more lopsided. (Let's use Ukraine as an example.)
An 84mm guided projectile with advanced warheads is a lot harder to see than a big TOW tripod. A small drone either thrown by hand or deployed by an M203 that can almost instantly locate enemy comms, or find the enemy using thermal/IR systems, and instantly relay the coordinates to a waiting artillery unit, etc - warfare is absolutely becoming more dangerous and more complicated from a weapons perspective.
The Brits seem to be leading the field quite well in adapting to & employing these same concepts, and seem to be well on their way to building a 21st century force that operates with these concepts in mind. I've found the recent transformation of the Royal Marines to be quite fascinating.
