- Reaction score
- 8,305
- Points
- 1,160
Naval expert's analysis of the strategic defence review
By WMNDavidWells | Posted: November 23, 2015
By Iain Ballantyne
SDSR-1
Prime Minister David Cameron (centre) talks to soldiers from the Royal Welsh Infantry as they stand in front of a Lockheed Martin Warrior Infantry Fighting Vehicle, during his visit to Royal Air Force station RAF Northolt, in west London ahead of his government's Strategic Defence and Security Review (SDSR)
Comments (0)
Naval expert and Westcountry-based author Iain Ballantyne gives his analysis of the Government’s Strategic Defence and Security Review (SDSR) and the challenges facing the future of the Royal Navy
SDSR 2015 appears to be good news for the Royal Navy and the South West.
There were serious fears that only eight Type 26 frigates (or ‘Global Combat Ships’) would ever be ordered. Period.
That would have signalled a reduction in the surface combatant force to unacceptable levels and a decline at Devonport, both in terms of refit work and also ships based there.
However, the Prime Minister pulled a commitment to new ‘light flexible frigates’ out of his back pocket. These warships have been under consideration for some time, but there was no sign they would ever be ordered.
The crucial issue for Devonport is whether it will get the eight high-end Type 26 frigates or the less sophisticated ‘light flexible frigates’, which are, anyway, still only an ambition rather than an actual order. Scrutinising the fine detail of the defence review indicates the eight Type 26s promised are only the first batch, with a further five to come at some date.
The UK MoD has committed itself to a force of 19 frigates and the proposed light frigates will be in addition to this.
Another piece of good news for Devonport is the Prime Minister’s commitment to four new Trident Successor submarines as that will mean decades of refit work for the dockyard at the same level as today. Reducing the nuclear deterrent force to three vessels had been proposed when the Lib Dems were in power with the Tories.
A word of caution: the construction of the Trident Successor submarines has yet to be 100 per cent confirmed by government (though the green light seems likely in 2016).
When it comes to the Royal Marines, the defence review promises a future for them as the nation’s amphibious and Arctic warfare specialists.
One of the new aircraft carriers is to be enhanced especially to carry them into action.
In terms of fleet support, three additional logistics ships are to be constructed.
Beyond all the fine words about new equipment there remains a serious and very damaging concern about personnel levels.
The Navy is not getting all the extra manpower it needs to crew the new aircraft carriers and it allegedly wanted a 2,000-strong boost to recruitment.
It’s only receiving an extra 700. This means it will continue to siphon men and women away from Devonport-based warships, and even Royal Marines to ensure carriers can put to sea. It also means the Devonport-based amphibious warfare ships may all be mothballed to crew the new carriers.
There also has to be grave concern about the time it takes to replace existing warships and maintain force levels, with some Type 23 frigates sailing on well into the 2030s.
They will be very elderly ships, increasingly costly to run and maintain on operations.
The Prime Minister has also announced a further two OPVs will be built to fill patrol vessel gaps. Whether this will mean additional work for Devonport Dockyard or where they will be based is unknown.
A new national shipbuilding strategy has also been promised for 2016.
Despite all of the above, there remain huge challenges for the Royal Navy, which is at its smallest for centuries and faces an ever-growing portfolio of global tasks.
• Iain Ballantyne is the Editor of WARSHIPS IFR magazine www.warshipsifr.com and the author of several naval history books. He is currently working on ‘The Deadly Trade’, a history of submarine warfare (to be published by Orion Books).
Read more: http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/Naval-expert-s-analysis-strategic-defence-review/story-28228249-detail/story.html#ixzz3sXcSOipo
Follow us: @WMNNews on Twitter | westernmorningnews on Facebook
http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/Naval-expert-s-analysis-strategic-defence-review/story-28228249-detail/story.html
So it appears like 8x Type 26 now, 5x Type 26 in batch 2 and a further 6 at some future time - not all necessarily equipped to the same standard?
http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2012/08/the-type-26-global-combat-ship-2/
In addition there is the light flexible frigate,
"Black Swan" or "Venator"
And finally two additional OPVs, presumably like the "Rivers"
My sense is the government is telling the RN to supply more hulls with a broader range of capabilities (some hulls more capable than others) and to cut the number of sailors necessary in each hull.