Navy_Pete said:
I think we really should just work on keeping all the soldiers/sailors/airmen(airwomen?) in basic shape before we worry about sending a team to compete in 90% of those sports.
There are always plenty of local competitions in the various disciplines that there really is no excuse not to do some kind of physical activity. I think money is much better spent on supporting a few base teams in a house league then getting a single 'elite' athelete to a world military games, where they will face actual professional athletes who happen to be in uniform.
The thing with that is it is very dependant on where you live, like i've pointed out before in Pet, if you're not into running, hockey, soccer and volleyball...you basically need to drive all the way to Ottawa (at the nearest!) for any other competitions, I don't even want to think about what its like in a remote place like Cold Lake or some other place similar. Others have pointed out it is different across the board, although in doing a little digging, i've mainly found more support for my argument:
Mountain Man = long distance, several hours...mainly running
Iron Man = long distance, several hours...mainly running
Bush Man = long distance, several hours...mainly running
RCAF Run = long distance, several hours...running
Canadian Army Run = long distance, several hours...running
Navy 10km Run = long distance, several hours...running
Canadian Forces Triathlon = long distance, several hours...mostly running
These are the ones I found with about only 5mins of searching, guarantee there are more.
I know plenty of people love their running...but A LOT of us hate it too, and only like running when it involves chasing food down or in a game/sport of some kind.
As far as actual sports go, from digging around i've found that yes other bases do offer more stuff, but definitely not all of them are in the same boat. As to the $$ and support issue, that's where we disagree, no offense to anyone here, but I don't see why we have to spend so much money funding several different hockey teams (as an example) AND money for ice rink on base, when there is pretty much always at least ONE ice rink in town AND an old timer/house league in town as well, yet we have our own. Hockey probably being the most expensive sport we support, soccer is cheap yet we have trouble maintaining fields properly. I would rather cut some of the ice rink money for example and either better equip other sports teams or facilities, but that's me.
GnyHwy said:
The saddest thing about the sports above, is that most of them are individual sports. Isn't the military a team effort? ???
I see where you're getting at, but look back centuries...hand to hand combat (a singular event) is central to any military, conditioning (i.e spartans) was primarily a solo event as well, i mean many boys/men were gathered about in the same area but physical conditionning, sword/spear practice was 1vs1, as well as wrestling/pankration. Same with the original olympiad which if i'm not mistaken was atleast in part fueled by militaries of the time. I don't see anything wrong with individual sports in regards to military applications. Lets be fair sometimes its hard to get 5-12 guys all together at the same time. Although we sell the team image of the military to the public, personal experience is many people are just out for their own.
quadrapiper said:
How much of the apparent shift can by tied to the move from internal PERI pers to PSP?
I was never in when the PERI were around, but since they were military I can only guess they were all about push-ups, running, smoking and hockey probably, so I would say PSP move is maybe not a bad thing...now if only they hired PSP who actually trained and looked like it as well as having knowledge that would be another step.
daftandbarmy said:
I agree. That's the secret of success behind a 'house sports league' approach. Everyone gets a chance to try their hand at everything.
And based on what kind of teams the troops want, you can engage with local civvy teams as part of a fun type of COMREL program. We frequently played rugby and soccer teams from a variety of local communities in various countries and it was good fun for everyone, especially when the 'British Army' lost!
This approach works well in small european countries because everything is so close, but here in Canada it would be more difficult to do because the majority of our bases are in bumf*ck nowhere. I do think it would be nice though if we could do it.
Tango2Bravo said:
Well, Petawawa certainly had Ex OLYMPIAN BEAR which was a week long culmination of the Base winter sports program. It also included non-traditional events such as crossfit and pugil fighting. When I was there (just left this APS), there were plenty of sporting activities. Parking that for a moment, how can you discount sporting concentrations that have "just hockey, volleyball, baseball, ballhockey, running teams." Those seem like a pretty good foundation to a sporting program. What's missing? We also had Ironman which gave folks a goal and plenty of training time to achieve it.
Most if not all major units have a weekly sports program in addition to their PT program. Training tempo gets in the way a lot of the time, but my point is that there are plenty of sporting activities.
you bring up a good point about olympian bear, the only downside of it, is that most units scramble to put teams together the week before the actual event, and even the sports that are more singular in nature are contested as team events during olympian bear.
In regards to your foundational comment, I get we're in Canada, hockey is everywhere and it is not leaving, cool. BUT not everyone plays or wants to play, agreed though if you have hockey, volleyball, soccer and basketball those are the "foundation" of a sporting program, but you said it yourself FOUNDATION, aka not the end all be all, more should be added on is what I am saying. As for the running teams...if it was a proper track and field team with running as a component I would be all for it. I mean we have track and field teams in elementary schools...how does the military not have one. Also majority of these don't leave opportunities for people who aren't skilled in any of those sports, which all concentrate primarily on the same modalities.
As far as most major units having weekly sports programs, other then maybe the INF, ARTY, ARMD, ENG...i've NEVER heard of this. For the past 2 yrs other then special training i've written memos for, I averaged PT probably once a month at best, our unit throws any morale booster like PT or sports out the window for productivity all the time. There is a sports afternoon at most once a month, probably closer to once every 2-3months.
With regards to what is missing/what they should add to the "foundational":
Track & Field
Aquatics
Boxing
Wrestling (the real kind)
MMA
I would say Olympic weightlifting also because the CF has a history in it, AND would greatly help mechanics that we use everyday (squatting, etc) as well as strengthen CF members whom many are in need of strength and added muscle for injury prevention.
I could add more but I know to stay within.