I have been reading this discussion for some time and I thought I might contribute a few comments. "Airborne" or the French "Aeroporte" means, very simply, carried by the air. It used to be in Canada that there was just one set of wings for everyone who jumped and all who earned those wings were paratroopers; nowadays there are many different wings to differentiate between different airborne roles. All of those roles start out with basic airborne training to qualify as a basic parachutist. Just because one takes parachute or "airborne" training does not make them a paratrooper.
Canada has had a number of formations over the years consisting of personnel who were airborne, or jump or parachute qualified and in addition were trained as paratroopers. What's the difference? Well it is really quite simple, all paratroopers are airborne or parachute qualified, but not everyone who is airborne qualified is a paratrooper. The difference is that paratroopers earn the right to wear the maroon beret and the silver (white) leaf on their wings through training in what to do once they reach the ground as a participant in airborne or parachute operations.
A basic parachutist, commonly referred to as airborne qualified, is not a paratrooper until they have trained to know what to do in airborne unit operations on the ground. Training and experience makes one a paratrooper, not just a jump course. Taking the Basic Parachutist course and qualifying makes one a military parachutist and that is substantially different from a civilian jumper. Wearing the badge or wings of a basic parachutist means that the person has been "airborne" and is thus a member of the airborne brotherhood. Being a member of the airborne brotherhood doesn't mean you are a paratrooper. It means that you have conquered a fear within and trusted yourself, your comrades, and equipment enough to jump out of a military aircraft. It means you have been 'airborne".
When someone says that so-and-so went "airborne" it is usually taken to mean that they have taken the Basic Parachutist Course. Context is quite important as someone might also have said that, for example: "So-and-so joined the Pats, took para and went "Airborne". Airborne in that context would mean that the person indicated joined a jump unit such as the now-disbanded Canadian Airborne Regiment, or one of the jump companies.
I am particularly sensitive to the whole issue as I once had the misfortune to run into a poser who claimed that he had been "Airborne" in the context of paratrooper, and wore the white leaf on his uniform. As my leaf is like my nom de plume, red, I gave him the benefit of the doubt until some of his jump stories did not ring true. When another jumper and I confronted the chap and asked for his course number he was done as he didn't know what it should be and tried to make up a number that was plainly untrue. He in fact hadn't qualified as a basic parachutist, let alone as a paratrooper. He was not airborne, didn't take the course and couldn't wear the t-shirt.
In short the word "airborne" has one basic meaning but two contexts that cause confusion. Being really clear helps a lot and what might be clear in a conversation doesn't come across so well in on-line format. The problem arises when someone claiming to have been "airborne" misrepresents himself as a paratrooper when they are merely a military parachutist, both of whom are in the most basic sense "airborne".
In the cadet world there is a real admiration and interest in all things military and the peak of achievement for an army cadet is to gain a spot on the CF Basic Parachutist Course. The selection process is rigorous and the candidates carefully screened. There is tremendous enthusiasm for all things "airborne" and sometimes youthful enthusiasm clouds better judgement. Those successful are rightfully proud of their achievement but sometimes enthusiasm gets people talking when they should be listening.
As well, many soldiers with lots of time in have little patience for the youthful enthusiasm which has not been dimmed by the sights that soldiers see, and thus there is little patience for those that are strutting their stuff and stretching the context. Perhaps there could be a bit of understanding from both points of view. Cadets should recognize that there are veterans reading these comments that find some of the puffing up offensive, and some of those soldiers with vast experience might try to remember what it was like to be young and full of idealism and enthusiasm.
I hope that these comments have been helpful.