- Reaction score
- 6,471
- Points
- 1,360
I don't understand the PLD thingy at all, so I can't comment,......but just as an average ex-govt worker, if the folks I worked with were handed this raise, they'd be tap dancing in the street.
This was my first thought. Imagine the Navy’s “missing middle” in 2030?The 7-year limit in a geographical area seems, on the face of it, to be incompatible with the RCN’s whole concept of home-porting. My initial look at what the numbers mean suggests major damage to the hard sea trades, especially on the west coast.
Have we paid for CSC yet? Because we might not be able to crew them.
The point of PLD was to pay for cost of living, or your monthly needs. Full stop. So if some one was paying for their house with it, that’s the bloody point.
On the bright side(for me), it might make a position or two I want a bit easier to get when the hard sea trade POs decide to release.This was my first thought. Imagine the Navy’s “missing middle” in 2030?
So PLD was a pay bump you got if you were posted to an area assessed as high cost in 2009. It was deeply flawed and hadn’t been updated in years. The new system will be a cost of living payment based on your income - ie lower pay gets a bigger cost of living top up. However it comes with new caveats - can’t get it in PMQs, can’t get it for more than 7 years in the same geographic posting.I don't understand the PLD thingy at all, so I can't comment,......but just as an average ex-govt worker, if the folks I worked with were handed this raise, they'd be tap dancing in the street.
Others have mentioned (correctly) that it's not a thing, as you can see in the pay scales that go from OCdt to LGen.Like GO/FO who negotiate salaries ?
You absolutely could, it’s not different that a welder if Ft Max using the fact that he’s paid more than a welder in Edmonton.I don’t think you could use PLD to qualify for a mortgage, as it was an allowance. So if people in Edm were factoring that amount for budgeting into their monthly mortgage payments...uh oh.
This was my first thought. Imagine the Navy’s “missing middle” in 2030?
On the bright side(for me), it might make a position or two I want a bit easier to get when the hard sea trade POs decide to release.
Good question. Does that factor into the adjusted cost of living? If so doesn’t that render LDA / SDA largely pointless?What effect does SDA/LDA have on all this ?
That is an interesting question. I suspect it has zero impact, as they are an allowance and not "monthly pay", but if SDA/LDA are included, even more people will be getting less CFHD...It's not good.
Promotions will be wide open. We're already hemorrhaging people on the Naval tech side... This will just rip the wound open.
What effect does SDA/LDA have on all this ?
How much has the general population had, on average, in terms of wage increase between 2021 and 2023? If it’s less than what we’re getting, the only optic that they will have is that we’re whining with our mouth full.
In a context of recession and financial hardship across the board, I believe it is a relevant benchmark.I'm not sure the spouses of family's that will see less disposable income in rising COL will care about that.
I know this metric is used often, but is it the best one to focus on?
I'm not sure the spouses of family's that will see less disposable income in rising COL will care about that.
I know this metric is used often, but is it the best one to focus on?
Ottawa is getting a major boost... Until I thought about how this would impact other areas I was pretty excited.So, so far there seems to be strong feelings of “navy’s in shit”, and “Edmonton’s got problems”. Anywhere else jumping out?
Ottawa is getting a major boost... Until I thought about how this would impact other areas I was pretty excited.
In an ideal world, yes. But in an ideal world, we’d all be making 30K a month.It's possible to help everyone you know.
So what metric do you suggest?
The logic checks out, but the messaging is going to have to be done correctly, and there will still be a lot of angry people who feel like the CAF let them down. Particularly those places where PLD was high, and that's all the member has ever known.In an ideal world, yes. But in an ideal world, we’d all be making 30K a month.
When given constraints (ie: no more money, just a new methodology), no. PLD was deeply flawed. Some benefited for years without an actual greater cost of loving than the benchmark. Note that the CAFHD is meant to make sure no one pays more than 25% of their gross monthly income in relation to a 2-bedroom appartment at their location (which is apparently the vast majority of dwellings used by the CAF according to CMP). That protection already exists for RHU so there is no need to compensate folks in RHU.
In a context of recession and financial hardship across the board, I believe it is a relevant benchmark.