Spencer100
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 2,201
- Points
- 1,040
Seems to be climbing now but that sort of announcement coupled with the court case would certainly cause that for sure.Almost a billion dollar drop in market shares and a loss of almost a million viewers immediately after the announcement of Carlson's departure.
But Murdoch is rich and almost dead so I doubt he cares much what happens.
He's a polemicist. There have been many before, and many will follow. And it would appear that his tactics are working, even on here.Sure. Russia's lost effective use of a good asset (I don't know if witting or unwitting, but I'm not about to credit Tucker Carlson with an abundance of wits) for a while.
I had to Google that.He's a polemicist. There have been many before, and many will follow. And it would appear that his tactics are working, even on here.
A demagogue is always a political figure. A polemicist can be political, but not exclusively.But I’m not sure if I agree to using that d
I had to Google that.
But I’m not sure if I agree to using that definition for him, and his show
Controversial sure, but I don’t think he had much debating. There were segments of it, but quite often he just stated things as facts, thinks that had proven to be false (as we saw in the lawsuit).
So I think demagoguery is a better word.
I’d argue he is/was a political figure, just not an elected one.A demagogue is always a political figure. A polemicist can be political, but not exclusively.
No Kevin. He is a political commentator.I’d argue he is/was a political figure, just not an elected one.
I would argue that the political class includes politicians, staffers, lobby types, pollsters and political commentators and pundits. When a guy like say Sean Hannity has the president on speed dial or a guy like Tucker Carlson can get Jan 6th footage directly from the house speaker they definitely move into the political figure realm.No Kevin. He is a political commentator.
He long stopped being a commentator, that requires facts…No Kevin. He is a political commentator.
Nothing new about any of the words used in this context.Why are new words necessary to describe something? Old ones not good enough for rolling out guilt-by-association fallacies?
You can expand the realm from political figure to political class until you reach a satisfactory conclusion that confirms your opinion. It smacks of sophistry.I would argue that the political class includes politicians, staffers, lobby types, pollsters and political commentators and pundits. When a guy like say Sean Hannity has the president on speed dial or a guy like Tucker Carlson can get Jan 6th footage directly from the house speaker they definitely move into the political figure realm.
Or smacks of of what it is. Don’t think for a minute that guys like Mike Duffy, Seamus O’reagan and plenty of other media types arent or weren’t part of the political class when they were mere news types. They were angling long before they became actual politicians. I see no difference here.You can expand the realm from political figure to political class until you reach a satisfactory conclusion that confirms your opinion. It smacks of sophistry.
Like the whole of the CBC.Or smacks of of what it is. Don’t think for a minute that guys like Mike Duffy, Seamus O’reagan and plenty of other media types arent or weren’t part of the political class when they were mere news types. They were angling long before they became actual politicians. I see no difference here.
No not the whole. But some to be sure are part of what I think is that Class or associated to it.Like the whole of the CBC.
I'm pretty sure Melody Lau from CBC Music who does interviews and writes articles about local Canadian music artists doesn't fit this category.Like the whole of the CBC.
Did the author try to fit as many right-wing buzzwords into an op-ed as possible?Compare and contrast?
Why they hate Tucker Carlson
The liberal elite’s fear of Fox News is really a fear of the white working class.www.spiked-online.com