• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

2022 CPC Leadership Discussion: Et tu Redeux


WATCH Extended cut: ‘Incredible how radical’ Trudeau is — Pierre Poilievre’s interview with Rex Murphy - 19 Dec 23

The Conservative Leader talks about what he plans to do if he’s elected, including drastically changing Canada’s climate policies, cleaning up crime, and cracking down on support for terrorists

In this special, extended-cut video edition of the Full Comment podcast, guest host Rex Murphy sits down with federal Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre for a year-end discussion after a very wild 2023 in politics.

Poilievre has undoubtedly been the political star of the year. Over the last 12 months, the federal Conservative leader has pulled off a dramatic lead in the polls, while the popularity of Justin Trudeau’s Liberals has crashed brutally. Now it looks like Poilievre could well be on his way to becoming prime minister.

Rex talks to Poilievre about why the Conservative leader thinks he’s seen such a strong performance this year, why he thinks so many Canadians have turned against Trudeau, and why Jagmeet Singh’s NDP could be just as vulnerable to the big political shifts that are underway.

Poilievre also tells Rex what he plans to do if he’s elected — to drastically change Canada’s climate policies, clean up crime, and crack down on support for terrorists.
 
What does he plan to do about Beijing’s influence and interference campaigns within the CPC? He’s been pretty mum on that.
 
What does he plan to do about Beijing’s influence and interference campaigns within the CPC? He’s been pretty mum on that.
That transcends party lines. Foreign states will get their hooks in anywhere they can, and will get their hands on any lever possible. Fighting foreign actor interference will take substantial political will, some legal reform, and ample intelligence, regulatory, and law enforcement resources.
 
Absolutely. I was hoping that since the Official Opposition was rightfully concerned about Beijing’s influence and interference which benefited the Liberal Party, they would be even more concerned about reports of Beijing’s and New Delhi’s operations within the CPC during their recent leadership campaign.

If they want to be seen as credible on the foreign interference file, they need to root out their own skeletons. So far, I’ve just been seeing them brush it off like any other time someone talks about an influx in new party members at a given riding association.
 

Debtonation - 27 Dec 23​


Poilievre’s latest instalment in video strategy targets debt​

Could spark communications competition - National Post -28 Dec 2023 - Stuart Thomson

If Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre’s documentary about housing in Canada released earlier this month seemed like an eccentric attempt at political communications, the party has now upped the ante with a multi-part series on the prospect of a debt crisis in Canada.

The first of five episodes was released on Wednesday and describes Canada’s cumulative debt, held by governments, businesses and Canadian citizens, as a “time bomb ticking away” under the homes of Canadians. All that debt, the video argues, could eventually bring the country’s economy to its knees if interest rates rise even two or three points from today’s levels.

Like the previous documentary, Poilievre provides the narration and it includes arguments and rhetorical flourishes he has been making in speeches since becoming Conservative leader last year.

Poilievre’s previous documentary released earlier in the month, about Canada’s “housing hell,” has racked up nearly half a million views on Youtube in about three weeks and 4.5 million views on X, formerly known as Twitter.

It could be the start of a new era in political communications, where politicians no longer assume they have to get their message across in 30-second bursts on TV or in short social media videos.

Instead, with a little bit of attention paid to production values, Poilievre has found a way to make lengthy and wonky arguments against Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

“I think the bar has been raised here and every time one of these videos comes out, it will reiterate that this is the new standard that political parties have to keep up with,” said Cole Hogan, a conservative digital strategist and principal at Earnscliffe Strategies.

The video also comes at a time when Poilievre is riding high in the polls and the Liberals are struggling to gain a foothold on the issues that are vexing Canadians. A new Nanos poll released on Wednesday found that 34 per cent of Canadians say Poilievre is their preferred choice for prime minister, which is a 10-year high for Conservative leaders and 13 points higher than Trudeau. The Conservative party continues to poll at over 40 per cent, which would likely be enough to deliver a majority government if an election were held today.

The top issues according to the Nanos poll are inflation, jobs and the economy, and the cost of housing.

Hogan said Poilievre’s command of these issues, and his creative way of showing it off, should be making the Liberals and NDP anxious about the next election.

“The political standard is now that you need to be putting out in-depth policy videos, and glossy, shiny ones that give Canadians a lot to chew on,” said Hogan.

“And I think the expectation for the Liberals and the New Democrats now is that they keep up. If Poilievre keeps doing circles around you in terms of putting out substantive content then your own base might even start not taking you seriously.”

The video is a grim walk through world economic history, using quotations from Winston Churchill, the stoic philosopher Seneca and the Greek philosopher Pythagoras.

Poilievre’s narration warns about the high human cost of an economic crisis, displaying research conducted at the University of Calgary about the increase in suicides that comes along with job losses. Poilievre also forecasts that Canada’s expanding medical assistance in dying program will mean people experiencing only a temporary economic setback could be at risk. The government faces a decision in March about whether the program should be allowed to expand to people whose only reason for seeking it is a mental disorder.

The video is not conventional holiday viewing, to say the least. Hogan said it was likely a deliberate choice by the Conservative party to post it when the rest of the news agenda is quiet and, in the wake of Christmas and Boxing Day shopping, when Canadians could be looking at big credit card bills.

“We are in the holiday deadzone here, where people aren’t paying much attention. But because there’s not a lot of new content or news during this period a lot of attention will be dedicated towards (this video),” said Hogan. “So now we have some political content in the middle of the holidays and people with a lot of idle time on their hands. So this might be an advantageous time to drop the video.”

The previous “housing hell” documentary was released on a Saturday morning, another unorthodox time for publishing political communications, but still managed to rack up millions of viewers and engagements. And for years as a member of Parliament, Poilievre held Sunday afternoon press conferences that allowed him to command the full attention of the journalists working on the weekend and, often, claim a prominent spot in the Monday morning newspaper pages.

That kind of thinking has been transferred to the production of web videos since the early days of Poilievre’s campaign for Conservative leader, sometimes with remarkable success. A video he filmed walking through a packed Pearson airport a year-anda-half ago, at the height of post-pandemic travel strife and fittingly titled “Pearson Airport sucks,” garnered a quarter-million viewers on Youtube. Another video of Poilievre verbally jousting with a journalist while eating an apple gained international headlines.

The other leaders have struggled to achieve online engagement approaching these heights. Perhaps the closest is NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh, who experimented with the video-based social media service Tiktok during the 2021 election campaign and built up a following of nearly a million users. Singh deactivated his Tiktok account this year in response to privacy and security concerns from Canada’s chief information officer.
 
The top issues according to the Nanos poll are inflation, jobs and the economy, and the cost of housing.

Meanwhile our current gov is obsessed with the cLiMAtE criSiS and thinking they can control the weather and snow fall rates in December.
 
A good analysis of the CPC’s very effective methods of getting their messages out.
 
A good analysis of the CPC’s very effective methods of getting their messages out.

Benjamin Franklin and John Wilkes

Radical politicians who ran their own presses and published their own papers and pamphlets.
 
Meanwhile our current gov is obsessed with the cLiMAtE criSiS and thinking they can control the weather and snow fall rates in December.
The US SECDEF and Deputy SECDEF are also obsessed with climate change. I guess they’re woke lefties.


 
The US SECDEF and Deputy SECDEF are also obsessed with climate change. I guess they’re woke lefties.


They'll say and do what it takes to get and maintain those appointments.
 
Deny...



Deflect...

You need to be some kind of special to think Canadas pollution has any sort of meaningful contribution to global weather. Swapping over to EVs or heat pumps while countries like China ramp up coal plants isn’t going to make it snow in Canada. This obsessive and unrealistic canadian transition to green while suffocating our energy sector is nothing more than politics to appease the radical left base, who ironically, suffer the most from their overlord policies.
 
You need to be some kind of special to think Canadas pollution has any sort of meaningful contribution to global weather. Swapping over to EVs or heat pumps while countries like China ramp up coal plants isn’t going to make it snow in Canada. This obsessive and unrealistic canadian transition to green while suffocating our energy sector is nothing more than politics to appease the radical left base, who ironically, suffer the most from their overlord policies.
So, correct me if I’m wrong here, are you suggesting that since an initiative isn’t going to solve something because other countries aren’t doing it too, we should never do it?
 
You need to be some kind of special to think Canadas pollution has any sort of meaningful contribution to global weather. Swapping over to EVs or heat pumps while countries like China ramp up coal plants isn’t going to make it snow in Canada. This obsessive and unrealistic canadian transition to green while suffocating our energy sector is nothing more than politics to appease the radical left base, who ironically, suffer the most from their overlord policies.
...and Diffuse!

You guys are on point tonight.
 
You need to be some kind of special to think Canadas pollution has any sort of meaningful contribution to global weather. Swapping over to EVs or heat pumps while countries like China ramp up coal plants isn’t going to make it snow in Canada. This obsessive and unrealistic canadian transition to green while suffocating our energy sector is nothing more than politics to appease the radical left base, who ironically, suffer the most from their overlord policies.
Most of China's new coal power is actually to serve as back-ups to renewables. They won't be the primary source of power except on like, cloudy or windless days.
 
So, correct me if I’m wrong here, are you suggesting that since an initiative isn’t going to solve something because other countries aren’t doing it too, we should never do it?
Not if it doesn't advance the aim. The aim is to reduce global emissions, not only Canadian emissions. We can probably do that best by exporting natural gas to countries which are currently burning coal. Of course, that might mean a local (Canadian) increase in emissions...
 
So, correct me if I’m wrong here, are you suggesting that since an initiative isn’t going to solve something because other countries aren’t doing it too, we should never do it?

Not at the sake of our own economy and well being of Canadians. The carbon tax isn't a climate plan, its a wealth distribution plan that doesn't address anything climate related. Paying 15c more per liter or more for groceries doesn't change the weather. The rich will get richer and the poor will get poorer. Energy use is directly correlated with quality of life and life expectancy drops as your energy consumption drops. So does your achievable education level. The LPC might preach that their carbon tax is a plan to address this climate cRiSiS, but it's not. How many carbons did this inept group of clowns emit through all the resources they wasted on putting dispensers in men's bathrooms? The hypocrisy is ridiculous.
 
...and Diffuse!

You guys are on point tonight.

Well I guess everything is great then. The country is doing better than it's ever been! Let's keep it going... let's increase taxes again, more reckless government spending, and offshore our critical energy supplies to adversarial countries.
 
Well I guess everything is great then. The country is doing better than it's ever been! Let's keep it going...

Trudeaus plan - create mulitple crisis's through his own incompetence and policies only to announce plans to combat the same incompetency. "We created the housing crisis so we're going to announce a housing plan to pretend like were doing something...more photo ops!" Then the LPC/NDP supporters clap like seals in support of their dear leaders.


DxpdbANWoAMrGut.jpg
 
Not at the sake of our own economy and well being of Canadians. The carbon tax isn't a climate plan, it’s a wealth distribution plan that doesn't address anything climate related. Paying 15c more per liter or more for groceries doesn't change the weather. The rich will get richer and the poor will get poorer. Energy use is directly correlated with quality of life and life expectancy drops as your energy consumption drops. So does your achievable education level. The LPC might preach that their carbon tax is a plan to address this climate cRiSiS, but it's not. How many carbons did this inept group of clowns emit through all the resources they wasted on putting dispensers in men's bathrooms? The hypocrisy is ridiculous.
Honest question:

Do you believe that there is a climate crisis and the LPC is going about it the wrong way because other countries are still polluting, or that there isn’t a climate crisis at all?
 
Back
Top