recceguy said:
Sorry. You're going to have to back this with more complete information (Unit, Brigade, etc), circumstances and criteria. What were the overall results of this drive? Stuff like that. Otherwise it can't be taken as serious. Least not as serious as we can take an anonymous user on a forum vouching for his even more anonymous source, supposedly somewhere in the CF. Get the picture?
OK, that's fair:
It's a three year infantryman Cpl in GGFG, who are part of 33 CBG, who has been faced with this decision. The person who spoke of this, is a friend of mine who is a Cbt Engr in 33 CER, same brigade, on his PLQ right now. I know the sapper through my JR Ranks mess (I'm in 28 SVC, who share the same mess), and he is a very honest staight-shooting soldier just as I am. So no, this is not rubbish. It is also not the first time I have heard of it being done.
The GGFG guy was to choose between the three:
"You will do your PLQ"
"You will earn a commission"
"You will see your way to the door"
And that is what happened. He decidied to earn a commission and he's taking officer crses right now.
The rationale behind this, appears to be that if he's not going to take PLQ/BMOQ right away, they might as well release him since 1) they can find someone else to do it, 2) they believe that him merely doing it later after having gained real exp. isn't good enough, and that he is wasting space by staying where he is.
But in the process, by releasing this guy, or someone at a similar point in their career they are getting rid of someone they spend a fair amount of time and money training, not to mention, having to RECRUIT and retrain yet another person, and making the demand for instructors worse little by little.
You can call this dumb or "sensitivity 101", I don't really care, but it's a true story. If you still do not believe me, then fine, I guess I just joined this forum to make up false stories and spread lies.. ???
The overall results? I don't think many people faced with that decision wanted release from the CF so the results have been some rather inexperienced or immature people winding up in charge of others (others though have done OK). NCOs lead by experience, and without enough substantial experience, how are they going to lead well? Regardless of what I have to work on - I've met products of this drive that are far below what initiative, intellect and competency a leadership role should expect of them (both Officers and NCOs).