- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 210
Exactly!! If I'm on my own time why am I still here????? ;DMunchin said:Being in the British Army I've always hated the phrase:- "C'mon, you're in your own time now!" ;D
Exactly!! If I'm on my own time why am I still here????? ;DMunchin said:Being in the British Army I've always hated the phrase:- "C'mon, you're in your own time now!" ;D
NinerSix said:"I thought I could push the material in the mulching machine by hand."
(This was after we extracted the guy using a grinder to cut him out and sent him to the hospital by ambulance. Thankfully the injury was relatively minor.)
recceguy said:You know the mantra though. The one professed by Unions and Safety organizations: "There is no such thing as a stupid worker, simply workers that have not had proper training." :
Jim Seggie said:Like the "no such thing as a stupid question?"
I beg to differ.
recceguy said:You know the mantra though. The one professed by Unions and Safety organizations: "There is no such thing as a stupid worker, simply workers that have not had proper training." :
Ask OSHAcupper said:If there is no such thing as a stupid worker, how do you explain the I-D-10-T's that have had the training, and still manage to pull a dumbass move?
recceguy said:Ask OSHA
Lawsuit of the day: Sarah Deming of Michigan is suing FilmDistrict, the distributor of Ryan Gosling's flick “Drive,” because she wanted more driving in the film, CNN confirmed.
The suit also names Novi, Michigan’s Emagine Theaters, because Deming wants her money back. Deming hopes to get others involved in the suit so they too can recover the ticket cost. The complaint doesn't specify how much she is seeking, just that she allegedly suffered "damages including but not limited to the purchase price of the ticket."
Deming claims that the promotional material for the crime drama was misleading, suggesting the film would feature more action-y driving scenes.
“Drive,” by the way, tells the story of a Hollywood stunt driver (Gosling) who gets involved with a heist gone wrong. It does feature a good deal of action (and violence), but there are other elements to the film. For instance, a love story.
The suit alleges that the company "promoted the film ‘Drive’ as very similar to the ‘Fast and Furious,’ or similar, series of movies." But, Sarah was sad to learn, "’Drive’ bore very little similarity to a chase, or race action film… having very little driving in the motion picture."
Deming also claims the film is anti-Semitic, and that it “promoted violence against members of the Jewish faith.”
A spokesperson for FilmDistrict told CNN they don't comment on pending litigation.
Sarah Deming may not have liked “Drive,” but critics did. The movie earned a score of 93 percent fresh on Rotten Tomatoes.
CDN Aviator said:For your consideration, in the category of "stupidest lawsuit i have heard of today"
http://marquee.blogs.cnn.com/2011/10/13/moviegoer-sues-not-enough-driving-in-drive/
Jim Seggie said:Maybe Sarah needs to be driven.......
PMedMoe said:Right in the head with a sledgehammer. :
Jim Seggie said:well not quite like that............
PMedMoe said:I prefer my partners to have a brain.
CDN Aviator said:Interesting use of the plural form...........
PMedMoe said:Well, if you meant it sexually, then go ahead. I prefer my partners to have a brain.
Jim Seggie said:I'm a man remember? brainless is Ok sometimes.... >
PMedMoe said:Well, if you meant it sexually, then go ahead. I prefer my partners to have a brain.