Well, I have a very dear friend who was a Wren during the war and continued on in her service to her country up to 1958. During the coronation of Queen Elizabeth II, military members from all the Commonwealth countries were invited to attend as an honour guard for HM. Among them was my friend. She was the only Reg F wren to attend and was selected out of all the serving women at the time - Canada wide.
Mrs, M, attended the coronation of HM, trained for the procession for weeks in the UK, marched on the day of the coronation for 13 miles, in heels, a skirt and in the pouring rain for Her Majesty. I'd say that puts her right up there in qualifying for a QGJM, right? I mean how much more does one need to demonstrate one was in service and on duty the day HM was coronated than to be marching in her coronation procession? Apparently, it's not enough. Mrs. M. was overlooked as a medal recipient even though her name, photograph and write ups all appear in the official book on Canada's involvement during the coronation.
I have tried unsuccessfully to have a medal set aside for her and have asked the GG's office to look into it. The reply was a so sad, too bad kind of response. So Mrs. M whose service number is under the 500 mark, who proudly represented Canada at the coronation of HM, and who now is a glorious 85 years young, remains without her (a) QGJM medal.
So mr-I-want-to-complete-my-medal-collection, I hope you find one and when you do, remember that probably the one person in Canada who was deserving of having such a medal has been forgotten and then denied hers. I hope at the very least, when you look upon the medal, you will remember the Wren who will never see one meant for her.