Vietnam vs Korea
- Thread starter scottishcanuck
- Start date
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 410
In the immortal words of Officer Barbrady “Okay people, move along, there's nothing to see here!”
That’s Mod speak for lets try and get back on topic. I’ve already exceeded my quota of locked threads this week. 8)
As my fellow Mod has pointed out lets not jump to assumptions and/or make presumptions about someone here. Yes he could be a draft dodger or deserter. He also could have served his time, got out and been disillusioned by the whole thing. He’s been given the opportunity to fill out this profile. Lets leave it at that for now.
That’s Mod speak for lets try and get back on topic. I’ve already exceeded my quota of locked threads this week. 8)
As my fellow Mod has pointed out lets not jump to assumptions and/or make presumptions about someone here. Yes he could be a draft dodger or deserter. He also could have served his time, got out and been disillusioned by the whole thing. He’s been given the opportunity to fill out this profile. Lets leave it at that for now.
midget-boyd91
Sr. Member
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 230
Putting it back on track......
Here's the most sensible reason (IMO) for the UN not going for the intervention in Viet Nam. Viet Nam had already been at war for more than a decade when the US responded into combat ops in '64. The French already had been defeated, the world already knew the kind of fight to expect and what the enemy was. When the UN intervened in Korea, there had not been war for a decade, and a major friendly military had not been defeated.
Here's the most sensible reason (IMO) for the UN not going for the intervention in Viet Nam. Viet Nam had already been at war for more than a decade when the US responded into combat ops in '64. The French already had been defeated, the world already knew the kind of fight to expect and what the enemy was. When the UN intervened in Korea, there had not been war for a decade, and a major friendly military had not been defeated.
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 210
As well you have to remember that Vietnam was after the Suez.
Maybe the British and Canadians did not support Vietnam for different reasons?
The Korean war started while the UK was preforming maybe the last sucessful counter insurgency campaign in S.E. Asia!
Out of the non koreans and chinese the US were by far the most important part of the UN force in Korea
You guys have a quota?
Maybe the British and Canadians did not support Vietnam for different reasons?
The Korean war started while the UK was preforming maybe the last sucessful counter insurgency campaign in S.E. Asia!
Out of the non koreans and chinese the US were by far the most important part of the UN force in Korea
You guys have a quota?
Blackadder1916
Army.ca Fixture
- Reaction score
- 2,748
- Points
- 1,160
Though both were proxy wars of the Cold War, the circumstances of Korea and Vietnam were different with regard to the run up to war, Korea being a relatively sudden, distinct action and Vietnam being a gradual escalation. For those not familiar with the circumstances of the two conflicts, let’s go to a history lesson for dummies (myself included).
Korea (having been occupied by Japan since the early part of the 20th century) was divided along the 38th parallel following the end of WW2 in 1945 into separate zones of occupation with the Soviet Union responsible for the north and the US for the south. Each enabled the establishment of a government in their respective halves that was favourable to their political ideology. The Allies (UN?) had as their intention the eventual reunification of Korea but no timetable or process had been identified. Following withdrawal of American and Soviet occupation forces from their zones the two Korean governments competed in their attempts to re-unite the peninsula under their own systems. There were limited military attacks along the border through 1949 and early 1950. North Korea, having been more heavily armed by the Soviet Union than South Korea by the Americans, changed the nature of the conflict with a full-scale invasion of the south commencing on 25 June 1950. This was the defining act of overt aggression that was used to request and receive authorization for UN military action.
The story is much more complicated and long-term in regards South Vietnam. At the end of WW2, France attempted to reassert itself in its colonial empire in Indochina (a federation of protectorates, Tonkin, Annam, Cambodia, Laos and one directly ruled colony, Cochinchina). Vietnamese nationalists (the Viet Minh, predominantly communist) opposed them in this led by Ho Chi Minh. For the first few years it was a low-level insurgency against the French authority. After the communists took control in China, they provided direct support to the Viet Minh and it became a more conventional war. This, the First Indochina War, lasted from 1946 to 1954 and was costly to the French in terms of money, casualties, power and prestige. Following the defeat of the French at Dien Bien Phu in 1954, an accord was reached at the Geneva Conference that resulted in independence being given to the former French Indochina possessions. The military action in Vietnam during this period could be viewed as similar in aim to the American Revolution. Vietnam (Tonkin, Annam and Cochinchina) was partitioned into northern and southern zones pending unification on the basis of internationally supervised free elections to be held in July 1956. As an aside, Canada was one of the three countries that made up the International Commission for Supervision and Control that was to monitor the partition process.
During the period 1954 to 1959 the governments of South Vietnam and North Vietnam ruthlessly suppressed political opposition in their own countries. The elections scheduled for July 1956 were not held primarily due to the decision of the South Vietnam government (supported by the USA) to not participate because any election would be unfairly won by the communists. By 1959 the north had reached the conclusion that the country would not be reunited by purely political means and ramped up the campaign of violence and insurgency in the south. The United States had been providing military assistance to the French during their war and continued their involvement in the region by aiding the government of South Vietnam. As the level of violence and insurgency increased so did the military assistance and level of participation from the USA. By 1965 the situation had developed to the point that the USA committed ground combat forces. Over the next few years US troop levels increased as the war escalated.
Korea (having been occupied by Japan since the early part of the 20th century) was divided along the 38th parallel following the end of WW2 in 1945 into separate zones of occupation with the Soviet Union responsible for the north and the US for the south. Each enabled the establishment of a government in their respective halves that was favourable to their political ideology. The Allies (UN?) had as their intention the eventual reunification of Korea but no timetable or process had been identified. Following withdrawal of American and Soviet occupation forces from their zones the two Korean governments competed in their attempts to re-unite the peninsula under their own systems. There were limited military attacks along the border through 1949 and early 1950. North Korea, having been more heavily armed by the Soviet Union than South Korea by the Americans, changed the nature of the conflict with a full-scale invasion of the south commencing on 25 June 1950. This was the defining act of overt aggression that was used to request and receive authorization for UN military action.
The story is much more complicated and long-term in regards South Vietnam. At the end of WW2, France attempted to reassert itself in its colonial empire in Indochina (a federation of protectorates, Tonkin, Annam, Cambodia, Laos and one directly ruled colony, Cochinchina). Vietnamese nationalists (the Viet Minh, predominantly communist) opposed them in this led by Ho Chi Minh. For the first few years it was a low-level insurgency against the French authority. After the communists took control in China, they provided direct support to the Viet Minh and it became a more conventional war. This, the First Indochina War, lasted from 1946 to 1954 and was costly to the French in terms of money, casualties, power and prestige. Following the defeat of the French at Dien Bien Phu in 1954, an accord was reached at the Geneva Conference that resulted in independence being given to the former French Indochina possessions. The military action in Vietnam during this period could be viewed as similar in aim to the American Revolution. Vietnam (Tonkin, Annam and Cochinchina) was partitioned into northern and southern zones pending unification on the basis of internationally supervised free elections to be held in July 1956. As an aside, Canada was one of the three countries that made up the International Commission for Supervision and Control that was to monitor the partition process.
During the period 1954 to 1959 the governments of South Vietnam and North Vietnam ruthlessly suppressed political opposition in their own countries. The elections scheduled for July 1956 were not held primarily due to the decision of the South Vietnam government (supported by the USA) to not participate because any election would be unfairly won by the communists. By 1959 the north had reached the conclusion that the country would not be reunited by purely political means and ramped up the campaign of violence and insurgency in the south. The United States had been providing military assistance to the French during their war and continued their involvement in the region by aiding the government of South Vietnam. As the level of violence and insurgency increased so did the military assistance and level of participation from the USA. By 1965 the situation had developed to the point that the USA committed ground combat forces. Over the next few years US troop levels increased as the war escalated.
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 210
Ah the good old ICSC,it was such a wonderful UN op that it was featured in a long running
comic strip in MAD magazine,Peace Doves I think it was called.
Regards
comic strip in MAD magazine,Peace Doves I think it was called.
Regards
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 410
An interesting use of ICSC reports:
"The insurgency cross-check was unexpectedly provided to me by the International Control Commission. They get reports from the communists as well as from our side, but in this case what interested me was the alleged incidents inside South Viet-Nam. The communists would report from Hanoi, through the ICC, that Americans or Vietnamese were doing certain things out in the villages which Hanoi alleged were "violations" of the ceasefire agreement. I said to myself, "If I plot out all the communist reports about alleged violations on a map, and if they match high-incident areas, there may be a logical connection between the guerrilla operators and the intelligence operators who provide the basis for the ICC reports." Sure enough the same areas with the high incidents also had high reports. As of early 1958, I knew we were in deep trouble in Viet-Nam and I kept saying so."(Fall)
"As the guerrilla war in the South slowly escalated throughout the late 1950s, Diem turned in-creasingly to the United States for military assistance. Chapter III of the Geneva Ac-cords, however, did not allow reinforcement of forces beyond the number present in 1954.65 This stipulation meant that the United States was legally restricted to only a handful of military advisors because its Military Assistance Advisory Group (MAAG) had numbered less than 400 per-sonnel when the Accords went into effect.66 The American solution to this legal quan-dary was simple: ignore the ICSC. Between 1956 and 1961, over two thousand addi-tional advisors entered South Vietnam under the guise of MAAG, and the Temporary Equipment Recovery Mission (TERM)(Schrebier)
Source:
Fall, Bernard B. "The Theory and Practice of Insurgency and Counterinsurgency" http://www.smallwarsjournal.com/documents/fall.pdf
Schreiber, Shane B. Major "THE ROAD TO HELL: CANADA IN VIETNAM, 1954-1973" http://wps.cfc.forces.gc.ca/papers/otherpublications/83_schreiber.pdf
"The insurgency cross-check was unexpectedly provided to me by the International Control Commission. They get reports from the communists as well as from our side, but in this case what interested me was the alleged incidents inside South Viet-Nam. The communists would report from Hanoi, through the ICC, that Americans or Vietnamese were doing certain things out in the villages which Hanoi alleged were "violations" of the ceasefire agreement. I said to myself, "If I plot out all the communist reports about alleged violations on a map, and if they match high-incident areas, there may be a logical connection between the guerrilla operators and the intelligence operators who provide the basis for the ICC reports." Sure enough the same areas with the high incidents also had high reports. As of early 1958, I knew we were in deep trouble in Viet-Nam and I kept saying so."(Fall)
"As the guerrilla war in the South slowly escalated throughout the late 1950s, Diem turned in-creasingly to the United States for military assistance. Chapter III of the Geneva Ac-cords, however, did not allow reinforcement of forces beyond the number present in 1954.65 This stipulation meant that the United States was legally restricted to only a handful of military advisors because its Military Assistance Advisory Group (MAAG) had numbered less than 400 per-sonnel when the Accords went into effect.66 The American solution to this legal quan-dary was simple: ignore the ICSC. Between 1956 and 1961, over two thousand addi-tional advisors entered South Vietnam under the guise of MAAG, and the Temporary Equipment Recovery Mission (TERM)(Schrebier)
Source:
Fall, Bernard B. "The Theory and Practice of Insurgency and Counterinsurgency" http://www.smallwarsjournal.com/documents/fall.pdf
Schreiber, Shane B. Major "THE ROAD TO HELL: CANADA IN VIETNAM, 1954-1973" http://wps.cfc.forces.gc.ca/papers/otherpublications/83_schreiber.pdf
Similar threads
