Feral said:Thomas P Radcliffe (Vancouver, BC) wrote 2 hours ago
It dawned on me during this disaster of a meeting that the Canadian Forces was in fact paying many (most) of the students there who voted down the issue. This was not a democratic vote, but a funded and organized co-opting of the process by the reservists and active members who are members of the UVSS!
Feral said:Thomas P Radcliffe (Vancouver, BC) wrote 2 hours ago
It dawned on me during this disaster of a meeting that the Canadian Forces was in fact paying many (most) of the students there who voted down the issue. This was not a democratic vote, but a funded and organized co-opting of the process by the reservists and active members who are members of the UVSS!
Feral said:Thomas P Radcliffe (Vancouver, BC) wrote 2 hours ago
It dawned on me during this disaster of a meeting that the Canadian Forces was in fact paying many (most) of the students there who voted down the issue. This was not a democratic vote, but a funded and organized co-opting of the process by the reservists and active members who are members of the UVSS!
decoy said:Apparently the "Counter-recruitment" campaign being undertaken by the anti-war lobby is a national issue:
Check THIS out (holy frack!):
http://operationobjection.org/
UNBELIEVABLE.
JBoyd said:well i always say, they whine and complain and where there 'dont support the troops' t-shirts, but who do you think keeps it so they are allowed to wear those shirts?
decoy said:It makes you wonder if they have ever actually spoken to a Canadian soldier??? Once again, it's much easier for them to pass judgment if they can conflate the US with Canada...