You’re being disingenuous. You picked the article to post. It’s full of references to Harris herself and her campaign. It specifically references Watergate as a comparator, and of course we all know Nixon himself was not in the hotel room. Among the bolded headings in the article:
- Breaking And Entering by Kamala Harris’ Secret Service
- The Kamala Harris’ Secret Service Crime [sic]
- Kamala Harris’s Lawless Campaign?
And that’s to say nothing of the main text itself, which just gets more shrill as it continues, culminating in outright silliness at the end.
So no, this is clearly written to try to make mud stick to Harris. Unless you intend to play more stupid than you’re treating all of us, you can’t pretend that’s not obvious and intended.