Interesting campaign. I can’t imagine that Pence would get behind this but it would be a coup if they got him on board.
It can matter despite what some say.
Is this a thing?
Will it matter who the VP choice is?
Probably won’t make a huge difference… But a small difference can still be significant.
Is this a thing?
Will it matter who the VP choice is?
Or also could be linked to him praising Putin again last night.Harris's "bump" includes the RCP 5-way average tipping slightly in favour, but it would be more useful to them if Democrats halted their efforts to block third-party candidates from ballots.
Yep. Reading that as well.US news is reporting Gov Tim Walz has the nod for Harris' VP.
Tim Walz debuts as Kamala Harris' VP pick at raucous Philly rally: Recap
Walz, 60, brings political mastery, suburban-rural synergy, and progressive patriotism to the competition.www.usatoday.com
So much for "WikiEditInt"US news is reporting Gov Tim Walz has the nod for Harris' VP.
Tim Walz debuts as Kamala Harris' VP pick at raucous Philly rally: Recap
Walz, 60, brings political mastery, suburban-rural synergy, and progressive patriotism to the competition.www.usatoday.com
Possible. It may also be possible that they feel they can still leverage them for those states and not take any risks.So much for either candidate selecting a VP to increase odds of taking a swing state or to appeal to voters beyond the base.
Regardless of whether this was a better choice than a more center-left option, or someone from a more contentious swing state, what this VP does is establish is that, unlike the Republican ticket, the Democrat Ticket is 100% "not weird".And now we wait and see what impact this has on the dynamic of the campaign.
MN hasn't been won by a Republican since 1972 (Nixon), and I don't find Trump's claim that MN is in play credible. OH...maybe, but I don't recall it ever popping into lists of swing states this time around.Possible. It may also be possible that they feel they can still leverage them for those states and not take any risks.
No I meant Arizona and Pensilvania. That both Shapiro and Kelly can still be leveraged without being VP.MN hasn't been won by a Republican since 1972 (Nixon), and I don't find Trump's claim that MN is in play credible. OH...maybe, but I don't recall it ever popping into lists of swing states this time around.
Nah. I think he was a safe choice.The Democratic ticket is now progressive left, and the Republican one is populist right. After all the crowing Democrats did asserting that Trump made an error picking Vance, I find Harris's choice is no better. I can't tell whether they're angling to win the presidency, or aiming to shore up seats in the House and Senate.
Possible. It may also be possible that they feel they can still leverage them for those states and not take any risks.
Shapiro is not popular with the progressive wing.
Kelly has a lock on an important senate seat.
Also, for all we know , something may have come up in the vetting process that they didn’t like.