- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 210
Thanks a lot for replies! They are taking 3 UTP-NCM PLT this year... Chances are low but you never know...
sidemount said:How it was explained to me (i was a MCpl 4 spec 1) is that you dont automatically go to the next higher pay incentive upon promotion to 2Lt/Lt. I was told that I would continue at my current rate of pay until I reached an officer level that was higher.
Since Ill be promoted to Lt and then 3 years later, Capt, I really wont get a pay increase until I hit Capt.
This may be wrong I dont know, just what I was told.
Hopefully a grad of the utpncm program will chime in
Awesome explanation! Thanks!jitterbug said:How does pay work?
The actual incentive level granted is determined IAW CBI 204.04(3) (b), which is the level and incentive that immediately exceeds their current rate of pay by an amount equal to the difference between the basic rate of pay and the first incentive in their new rank.
Example:
Cpl Smith is appointed OCdt and will continue to be paid at Cpl (4) IAW CBI 204.211 (10); his current rate of pay is $4663/mos; until he graduates from officer training, he will continue to receive annual increases, but no additional incentive increases as he has already reached the maximum; upon graduation, OCdt Smith will be promoted to 2Lt and paid at level D to Table "B" IAW CBI 204.211 (7) (a) (ii); finally, IAW CBI 204.04 (3) (b), pay is calculated as follows (at 2009 rates) -
i. Difference between incentive 1 and basic = $4718 - $4583 = $135
ii. Rate of pay will be no lower than current rate $4663 + $135 = $4798
iii. Rate of pay on promotion is nearest incentive equal to or above $4798 = 2Lt (2) or $4860
CANFORGEN 077/15 CMP 038/15 151759Z APR 15
RANK AND PROMOTION UPON COMMISSIONING FOR IN-SERVICE COMMISSIONING PLANS, REGULAR FORCE
ShoddyGunner said:Wasn't able to find this elsewhere, but also wasn't totally sure what to search for.
ShoddyGunner said:Wasn't able to find this elsewhere, but also wasn't totally sure what to search for.
ShoddyGunner said:Also, totally forgot about the "site:" function on Google - I think it'll help me find what I'm looking for in the future.
Loachman said:I doubt that he's likely to reveal his secrets. If everybody could do this, we'd have to pay him less.
And I've merged several of the links that he provided into one thread - seven pages of most-likely repetitive questions.
Anybody want to start a pool on the date of the next new thread on this subject...?