• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Unity of Purpose

tomahawk6

Army.ca Legend
Inactive
Reaction score
64
Points
530
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/2990814/General-Petraeus-told-he-must-succeed-in-Afghanistan.html

The man behind the "surge" strategy in Iraq will take charge of US Central Command tasked with bringing fresh direction to an Afghan campaign that was seen as "marking time".

But he will face a tough battle to bring unity to the 40 nations and 53,000 foreign troops in Afghanistan that come under several different chiefs.

In a downbeat assessment of the current state of the campaign in Afghanistan, the officer said there was "100 per cent chance of success if we do it the right way but if we do it the wrong way there is a zero per cent chance".

He admitted that it was unlikely other nations such as Germany would get more involved in the fighting in southern Afghanistan.

He also warned that like the British Army, the American military was suffering from the effects of continual operations over seven years. "At some point we have to refit, rest our force and retrain them before we redeploy them."

Gen Petraeus will look to unite commanders in Afghanistan and Iraq for "unity of purpose" so there could be "unity of effort," the military official told defence correspondents in London.

Adding to his concerns a district governor in southern Afghanistan allied to President Hamid Karzai has been killed in a "misunderstanding" between coalition and Afghan forces.

Roozi Khan, the governor of Chora district in Uruzgan province, was shot dead at his home but no details were released.

Following comments made by Robert Gates, the US defence secretary, that Britain may increase its force next year the US officer said "force strength from elsewhere would be welcome".

American troops are expected to surge to Afghanistan in increasing numbers from 30,000 to 44,000 next year. "You will get more combat operations for a period of time," the officer said.

The US official said American military power was "finite" and that there was a "bottom line" on resources.

Although he was not "despairing" it was up to the community of nations to "embrace the challenge" of Afghanistan and "honest leadership" was needed.

To resolve the problems of Afghanistan it would take a "long time" if not a couple of decades.

Iran was singled out as a "malign influence" for its "seepage" of weapons across the border.

The officer said America would not tolerate the arrival of more armour piercing bombs, known as explosive formed projectiles, from Iran.

He said rogue elements of the Iranian regime, not necessarily connected to the government, were using "front companies" to fund the military operations in Iraq, Lebanon and Afghanistan.

The officer suggested that US forces would "selectively go after nodes of that network" but ruled out any "combat operations in Iran".

It is expected that Gen David McKiernan, the current US commander, will unite the commands of the International Security Assistance Force and the mainly US special forces of Operation Enduring Freedom under the banner of Commander Forces Afghanistan.
 
Interesting.. first we speak of a possible alienation of Pakistan as an ally, due to its inept ability to purge the insurgency from its borders, and now we are talking of 'selectivly pusuing nodes' in Iran. I think this will get alot worse before we see it get any better.Ubique
 
Good to know more support is on its way. Good luck to trying to unify all of NATO. I'm glad Gen Petraeus's attention is now on Afghanistan since he seemed to turn Iraq right around (from my civilian view of the issue). I picked up the US Army/USMC Counterinsurgency field manuel which Gen Petraeus had a hand in. So far it seems rock solid compared to previous efforts in Vietnam and Central America on paper and hopefully under Petraeus the trend will continue in the field :)
 
forcerecon85 said:
Good to know more support is on its way. Good luck to trying to unify all of NATO. I'm glad Gen Petraeus's attention is now on Afghanistan since he seemed to turn Iraq right around (from my civilian view of the issue). I picked up the US Army/USMC Counterinsurgency field manuel which Gen Petraeus had a hand in. So far it seems rock solid compared to previous efforts in Vietnam and Central America on paper and hopefully under Petraeus the trend will continue in the field :)

More precisely, he's in charge of CENTCOM, which is one level above being in charge of the mission in either Iraq or Aghansitan.

708px-CENTCOM_AOR.jpg


If you'll permit me to be a bit melodramatic, he gets the unenviable distinction of being the U.S. theatre commander for the Great War of Civilization. In addition to having both Iraq and Afghanistan under his purview, he gets a great many of the world's other trouble spots on his radar too.

He will undoubtedly have a good deal of influence on how Afghanistan is handled; realistically the Americans have a great degree of steering power in how ISAF functions- but at the same time it's not his job to make that direct call, but more to inform and guide the policy of his subordinate in charge of Afghanistan.

I can see both pros and cons to his being in charge of CENTCOM. I hope he can detach himself enough from Iraq to not bring an Iraq-centric approach to the entire command, but at the same time he is also about as well versed in counterinsurgency as any man in the collective Western military establishment can be. He stands to bring a lot to the command.

It will be interesting to see where things stand in 18 months or so.
 
I do hope this now means that the mission will now be more focused on the North West Frontier province of Pakistan.

All the problems for the West have been and do arise from there.
 
Back
Top