Yup, that’s likely correct. Particularly if CPC can’t repeat the majority.The best time to strike for the next person who wants to lead the LPC as PM in Parliament will be after the first re-election of the CPC.
Yup, that’s likely correct. Particularly if CPC can’t repeat the majority.The best time to strike for the next person who wants to lead the LPC as PM in Parliament will be after the first re-election of the CPC.
And it is likely the CPC will have to make very unpopular spending cuts. If they sell it well and grow the economy well enough, they might squeak a second majority, but PP should be looking for a new job around year 6 and passing the torch…Yup, that’s likely correct. Particularly if CPC can’t repeat the majority.
The Labour Party of the UK originated as a christian national socialist party. They organized on Methodist church principles in England and aspired to build Jerusalem in England's green and pleasant land. This resulted in them being early supporters of Zionism.
There is still a schism between that wing of the party and the Red Rag mob of Trotskyites represented by Corbyn. The third way is the Fabian Social Democrats of Shaw, the Webbs, the LSE and the Blairites.
The problem is that the working classes are often highly patriotic and nationalistic.
Up the Lions! Engaland, Engaland, Engaland!
And it is likely the CPC will have to make very unpopular spending cuts. If they sell it well and grow the economy well enough, they might squeak a second majority, but PP should be looking for a new job around year 6 and passing the torch…
I think you are right - it sucks that the man we vote in to unf**k the country will probably end up being unpopular for doing just thatAnd it is likely the CPC will have to make very unpopular spending cuts. If they sell it well and grow the economy well enough, they might squeak a second majority, but PP should be looking for a new job around year 6 and passing the torch…
Remember Labour won not because they gained in popularity (only went up 2%, generally they did pretty poorly by a first past the post standard even) rather the Tories lost their support.The Labour Party of the UK originated as a christian national socialist party. They organized on Methodist church principles in England and aspired to build Jerusalem in England's green and pleasant land. This resulted in them being early supporters of Zionism.
There is still a schism between that wing of the party and the Red Rag mob of Trotskyites represented by Corbyn. The third way is the Fabian Social Democrats of Shaw, the Webbs, the LSE and the Blairites.
The problem is that the working classes are often highly patriotic and nationalistic.
Up the Lions! Engaland, Engaland, Engaland!
Canadians may end up being very understanding of just how necessary those cuts actually are.
Yes, and that cuts across all political sides. A conservative retiree will complain just as loud if OAS is cut as a liberal retiree.Canadians want their cake and eat it too. They’ll (by virtue of their socialist NDP/LPC MPs) cry foul that they’re losing their handouts. Canadians think they are entitled to their entitlements.
The Labour Party of the UK originated as a christian national socialist party. They organized on Methodist church principles in England and aspired to build Jerusalem in England's green and pleasant land. This resulted in them being early supporters of Zionism.
A “handout” assumes that the person hasn’t/doesn’t pay taxes or fees to pay for said services.
And then you end up creating a tiered society where only the well off get services?40% of Canadians don't pay federal income tax. You cut them off from free social services that the government provides based off the tax of the other 60%, the federal books look a lot better.
And then you end up creating a tiered society where only the well off get services?
Define freeloaders. Is this a blanket definition or limited?Well off? You mean the people who put more into the system than they take out?
The freeloaders need to be cut off. Enough is enough.
Define freeloaders. Is this a blanket definition or limited?
And they even have their own national newspaper
Latest news, sport and opinion from the Guardian
Latest international news, sport and comment from the Guardianwww.theguardian.com
Ok. Thanks for clarifying that. I can to an extent agree with that.Willfully unemployed. Salary shouldn't matter, as long as you're providing a service if you're physically able. Not wanting to work is not an excuse.
This also is related to adopting a two-tiered system of healthcare but that's an entirely different topic.
so we have allowed 1 million or more new residents into the country. Many of those are either illegal or on student visas. Are they part of the 1.4 million or are they in a separate category? If they are part of the same group, getting rid of the illegals seems like a great solutionFWIW, some employment stats....
'Willfully unemployed' doesn't seem to be part of the data set
Unemployment rate rises to 6.4%
The overall unemployment rate rose 0.2 percentage points to 6.4% in June. It has trended up since April 2023, rising 1.3 percentage points over the period. There were 1.4 million unemployed people in June 2024, an increase of 42,000 (+3.1%) from the previous month.
Of those who were unemployed in May, just over one-fifth (21.4%) had transitioned to employment in June (not seasonally adjusted). This was lower than the pre-pandemic average for the same months in 2017, 2018, and 2019 (26.7%). A lower proportion of unemployed people transitioning into employment may indicate that people are facing greater difficulties finding work in the current labour market.
As the unemployment rate has increased over the past year, so too has the proportion of long-term unemployed. Among the unemployed, 17.6% had been continuously unemployed for 27 weeks or more in June 2024, up 4.0 percentage points from a year earlier.
Older unemployed persons were more likely to be in long-term unemployment; 22.0% of unemployed people aged 55 and older had been continuously unemployed for 27 weeks or more in June. In comparison, the proportion was 19.3% for those in the core-aged group and 12.2% for youth.
The Daily — Labour Force Survey, June 2024
Employment was virtually unchanged in June (-1,400; -0.0%), and the employment rate fell 0.2 percentage points to 61.1%.www150.statcan.gc.ca
so we have allowed 1 million or more new residents into the country. Many of those are either illegal or on student visas. Are they part of the 1.4 million or are they in a separate category? If they are part of the same group, getting rid of the illegals seems like a great solution
Very few are "illegals". Many are making a Refugee claim, that in an actual democracy vice a demography, is a legally binding requirement for Canadaso we have allowed 1 million or more new residents into the country. Many of those are either illegal or on student visas. Are they part of the 1.4 million or are they in a separate category? If they are part of the same group, getting rid of the illegals seems like a great solution
Being an at-home spouse has never been employment or unemployment. If we're going to be precise, "unemployed" applies to people looking for work and not getting it. The closest anyone can come to willful unemployment is looking for work and finding ways to sabotage every opportunity.But what happens in the case of a parent that opts to stay home to raise children? That is technically willful unemployment.