Or there was something planned that would have been too destabilizing and potentially escalatory if succesful?I translate the article above as the current American administration want to micro manage its way to victory..,...
Or there was something planned that would have been too destabilizing and potentially escalatory if succesful?I translate the article above as the current American administration want to micro manage its way to victory..,...
I read it more that way, too.Or there was something planned that would have been too destabilizing and potentially escalatory if succesful?
OK, I'll refine my take a bit: 85% "ya know, it could get REALLY ugly for more than just you guys if you do this" and 15% back-seat driver.I translate the article above as the current American administration want to micro manage its way to victory..,...
limited barrel production in Russia? I wonder how true this is and if they can just get them from China Iran and NK?
Plus bought them from Austria wtf
Very few places have the means of manufacturing those exotics as well.Another reason why drones and missiles will replace guns.
Nobody has the forges and the metalworking infrastructure of the 19th century that built bridges, railways, ships, boilers, skyscrapers and Eiffel towers. That infrastructure enabled the shells of WW1 and WW2.
Now we build with silicon and carbon and a multitude of exotics.
That is what we will be throwing at each other.
Very few places have the means of manufacturing those exotics as well.
Biggest difference between the 19th century tech and modern tech is I can set up 19th century tech and get it going from scratch, modern tech is a bit more difficult to do.
It all relies on a few countries to make it, and if they choose to withhold it you are screwed. Look at microchips for example, amazing to have but if they refuse to supply you have no alternative options.
And confirmed
Fun fact in exercise the soviets - and even the modern Russian army had a average friendly fire rate of 30%. a couple exercises back in the 80s got as high as 60%Who says Russian AD systems don't work?
Russian friendly fire shoots down Mi-8 helicopter over Donetsk
On Wednesday, July 31, a Russian Mi-8 helicopter was shot down near the occupied city of Donetsk. According to multiple Russian sources, the helicopter was inadvertently struck by its own air defense systems, which were engaged in repelling a missile and bomb attack by Ukrainian forces...defence-blog.com
how many own goals have they got in this conflict so far?Fun fact in exercise the soviets - and even the modern Russian army had a average friendly fire rate of 30%. a couple exercises back in the 80s got as high as 60%
It’s the one they smoked last year in Sevastopol, reportedly it was under repair, and now it’s under water.The BBC is carrying an article claiming that they have destroyed a submarine in one of the harbours in the Crimea. Information so far is very sketchy
how long before the cannon fodder says no more. Or maybe their mothers and wives rise up. Those figures are insane.
Im not holding my breath on that onehow long before the cannon fodder says no more. Or maybe their mothers and wives rise up. Those figures are insane.
Russia seems to thrive on misery. They apparently don’t even put much thought into how/why the Tsar was deposed either, or Putin would have been offed over a year ago.how long before the cannon fodder says no more. Or maybe their mothers and wives rise up. Those figures are insane.
Unconfirmed reports also indicate that the UAF hit the Russian airbase at Morozovsk. More info on both strikes can be found here:The BBC is carrying an article claiming that they have destroyed a submarine in one of the harbours in the Crimea. Information so far is very sketchy