This opinion piece from USNI's Proceedings suggesting the the US Replicator program which is seeking to mass produce low cost, small UAV's like those being used extensively in Ukraine is the wrong approach.
General Prize Essay Contest—First Prize. Sponsored by Andrew and Barbara Taylor. Drones won’t offset China’s growing military, but more weapons could.
www.usni.org
The author suggests that these platforms, while generating some tactical success as part of a combined arms basket of weapons are diverting funding from weapon systems that have the ability to deliver strategic success.
He focuses particularly on the Pacific theatre where he says that the types of UAVs used in Ukraine - where the average engagement range is around 7 miles - makes these types of platforms unsuitable. He does however agree that large volumes of cheap UAV's, USV's and UUV's would be useful by Taiwan should PLA forces actually reach the shorline in an invasion.
He suggests that focusing on producing a mass of higher end weapons like the Long Range Anti-Ship Missile (LRASM), heavier kamikaze USVs and XLUUVs equipped with advanced sea mines would be a better solution.
Extrapolating this to Ukraine it might suggest that building up large stocks of Precision Strike Missiles, ground attack cruise missiles, long range AAM's and ASM's would have a greater strategic affect on a war with Russia than masses of the small drones being used currently in Ukraine.