kkwd said:Don't panic yet, it is still early.
How about now?
Looks like Trump got played.
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2018/07/07/what-now-pompeo-exits-north-korea-emptyhanded-leaving-us-with-three-options-all-them-bad.html
kkwd said:Don't panic yet, it is still early.
tomahawk6 said:Every President that dealt with the North got played.As for Trump he never gave in on sanctions and the recent tariffs on China I think are to force them to lean on North Korea. Pressure is the only thing the North understands.
Not meeting with NK wasn't working. The Democrats demanded diplomacy when Trump used some pretty harsh rhetoric and threats, but now diplomacy wasn't the right way?Remius said:Except this one actually agreed to meet with him. No other president gave NK that legitimacy they wanted.
PuckChaser said:Not meeting with NK wasn't working. The Democrats demanded diplomacy when Trump used some pretty harsh rhetoric and threats, but now diplomacy wasn't the right way?
Remius said:Except this one actually agreed to meet with him. No other president gave NK that legitimacy they wanted.
Jarnhamar said:Honest question how is meeting with Trump giving him legitimacy? Was he not considered the president before because no one wanted to meet with him?
Does it make him more powerful to his own people? It seems like he has an iron grip on them already.
Diplomacy doesn't work so take out their ability to make WMDs.
Remius said:This article from CNN explains it quite well.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/04/asia/kim-family-trump-summit-intl/index.html
Basically he wants to solidify his regime, buy time and show world that his regime is legitimate.
Trump fell for it.
SeaKingTacco said:But his regime is legitimate, in the sense that he has a solid grip on power in North Korea.
He may be an odious, tryannical beast of a human being, but I don't think too many people question who is in charge up there.
SeaKingTacco said:But his regime is legitimate, in the sense that he has a solid grip on power in North Korea.
He may be an odious, tryannical beast of a human being, but I don't think too many people question who is in charge up there.
PPCLI Guy said:The same was true of the Taliban.....and ISIS in its caliphate
Remius said:Being in charge does not equate to legitimacy. On the international stage NK is isolated with limited trade and diplomatic relations.
Meeting with the Trump gave them a perception of more legitimacy. It's what they wanted and what they got. He got the US to stop their exercise, got them to pull more troops from Seoul and a beautiful photo op and Trump saying wonderful things about Kim and bought more time. The US got nothing in return.
What was touted as one of his signature accomplishments will likely go down as a blunder.
Remember that the DKPR thinks it is the legitimate government of all of the Koreas.
Sorry guys, you can't sugar coat this or brush it off as nothing.
Remius] This article from CNN explains it quite well. [/quote] I read the article said:According to rumours President Trump is not a legitimate president in the view of much of the world. Then how can he giving legitimacy to a regime if he is not legitimate himself?
Remius said:Sorry guys, you can't sugar coat this or brush it off as nothing.
recceguy said:I'm just spitballin' here, but I don't think Trump's team puts much credence in your points.
People just can't stand the fact that he might be doing something right. You are entitled to your thoughts, but I think I'll wait for the results before trying to decide whether his initiative was worth it or not. Or who did what. On the diplomatic front, you can't make a judgement from one meeting of the leaders. Sometimes these things take years.
At least he's trying to move things forward as opposed to the likes of Obama paying blackmail money to Kim and doing nothing.
recceguy said:People just can't stand the fact that he might be doing something right. You are entitled to your thoughts, but I think I'll wait for the results before trying to decide whether his initiative was worth it or not. Or who did what. On the diplomatic front, you can't make a judgement from one meeting of the leaders. Sometimes these things take years.
:rofl:PPCLI Guy said:That sounds entirely reasonable.
How about we apply this new approach to discussions in threads about Canadian politics....