• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

The Threat of Modern Piracy- A Merged Thread

E.R. Campbell said:
Can anyone shed any light on this?

I know I heard it; I stopped what I was doing to listen. The reporter said Canada had agreed to extend VDQ's stay on station, in the region, at the request of the World Food Programme because, as the WFP said, no other nation is willing to take on the task. But I have found/heard/read nothing since.

I also saw the same report a couple of days ago (scrolling along at the bottom of either CBC's or CTV's news channel) but no further details.  As well, haven't been able to find any other mention of this.  The VDQ had been detached earlier from Standing NATO Maritime Group One (SNMG 1) and was due to return to SNMG 1 (currently in the Med) when its task of escorting WFP ships ended (?end of month).  It is possible this has been extended since the VDQ was to be deployed with SNMG 1 until December (IIRC).

CougarDaddy said:
Does this answer your question?

Norwegian warship to fight pirates off Somalia - report

While the Fridtjof Nansen may be heading to that part of the world in response to Somali pirates, it does not sound like the Norwegian government has specifically provided it to escort the WFP ships.

http://www.norwaypost.no/cgi-bin/norwaypost/imaker?id=194198
The Norwegian frigate would join an international naval force which is already in place, in an effort to protect international merchant shipping against the growing menace of pirates in these waters.
 
Blackadder1916 said:
I also saw the same report a couple of days ago (scrolling along at the bottom of either CBC's or CTV's news channel) but no further details.  As well, haven't been able to find any other mention of this.  The VDQ had been detached earlier from Standing NATO Maritime Group One (SNMG 1) and was due to return to SNMG 1 (currently in the Med) when its task of escorting WFP ships ended (?end of month).  It is possible this has been extended since the VDQ was to be deployed with SNMG 1 until December (IIRC).

While the Fridtjof Nansen may be heading to that part of the world in response to Somali pirates, it does not sound like the Norwegian government has specifically provided it to escort the WFP ships.

http://www.norwaypost.no/cgi-bin/norwaypost/imaker?id=194198

I'm suspecting that what may have occured is that she's extended only until her replacement ship (Norweigian ship - given below) arrives on scene.
 
ArmyVern said:
I'm suspecting that what may have occured is that she's extended only until her replacement ship (Norweigian ship - given below) arrives on scene.

From what I read the Norwegian Ship is not due on station until spring....am I getting dyslectic?
 
More important is what is on that Iranian ship ? I am guessing nuclear material. Could be some type of biological or chemical weapon I suppose. But nuclear would make for a fine novel. ;)
 
E.R. Campbell said:
Can anyone shed any light on this?

I know I heard it; I stopped what I was doing to listen. The reporter said Canada had agreed to extend VDQ's stay on station, in the region, at the request of the World Food Programme because, as the WFP said, no other nation is willing to take on the task. But I have found/heard/read nothing since.

And here is the announcement.

I was beginning to think I was hallucinating.

 
Pirates seize ship carrying military tanks
Article  Comments  ANDREW CAWTHORNE  Reuters September 26, 2008 at 6:24 AM EDT
Article Link

NAIROBI — A Ukrainian ship captured by Somali pirates en route to Somalia is carrying at least 30 tanks, a regional maritime organization said on Friday.

Ukrainian news agency Interfax-Ukraine also said the ship, operating under a Belize flag, had a military cargo “including about 30 T-72 tanks”.

That would be a significant and potentially dangerous seizure in Somalia, where Islamist insurgents have been battling the government and its Ethiopian military allies for nearly two years.

Although the subject of a UN arms embargo, the Horn of Africa nation is awash with arms.
More on link
 
They also tried to take on the U.S. Navy: (Courtesy of Navy Times)  Fleet oiler repels suspected pirates

By Andrew Scutro - Staff writer
Posted : Wednesday Sep 24, 2008 20:51:15 EDT
 
NORFOLK, Va. — A Navy security team aboard the fleet oiler John Lenthall kept two small boats at bay with warning shots on Tuesday near Somalia, according to a bulletin from 5th Fleet in Bahrain.

The waters off the Horn of Africa have been fertile hunting grounds for pirates in recent years despite the efforts of allied navies to thwart attacks on commercial shipping. Information on the Sept. 23 incident clearly states that the intent of the small boat operators was uncertain, but notes the boats were in pursuit of the 41,000-ton Military Sealift Command ship and maneuvering “consistent with reports of previous attacks on merchant vessels in the region.”

No injuries were reported and “all shots were accounted for as they entered the water.”

MSC ships are manned by civilians but do embark Navy security detachments. The John Lenthall is a Kaiser-class fleet oiler and replenishes strike group ships while underway.

It was also noted that the incident did not take place inside the recently established “Maritime Security Patrol Area”, a zone in the Gulf of Aden to focus on piracy.

 
YZT580 said:
They also tried to take on the U.S. Navy: (Courtesy of Navy Times)   Fleet oiler repels suspected pirates

By Andrew Scutro - Staff writer
Posted : Wednesday Sep 24, 2008 20:51:15 EDT
   
NORFOLK, Va. — A Navy security team aboard the fleet oiler John Lenthall kept two small boats at bay with warning shots on Tuesday near Somalia, according to a bulletin from 5th Fleet in Bahrain.

A link would be nice.  http://www.navytimes.com/news/2008/09/navy_pirates_092408w/
 
YZT580 said:
They also tried to take on the U.S. Navy: (Courtesy of Navy Times)   Fleet oiler repels suspected pirates

By Andrew Scutro - Staff writer
Posted : Wednesday Sep 24, 2008 20:51:15 EDT
   
NORFOLK, Va. — A Navy security team aboard the fleet oiler John Lenthall kept two small boats at bay with warning shots on Tuesday near Somalia, according to a bulletin from 5th Fleet in Bahrain.

The waters off the Horn of Africa have been fertile hunting grounds for pirates in recent years despite the efforts of allied navies to thwart attacks on commercial shipping. Information on the Sept. 23 incident clearly states that the intent of the small boat operators was uncertain, but notes the boats were in pursuit of the 41,000-ton Military Sealift Command ship and maneuvering “consistent with reports of previous attacks on merchant vessels in the region.”

No injuries were reported and “all shots were accounted for as they entered the water.”

MSC ships are manned by civilians but do embark Navy security detachments. The John Lenthall is a Kaiser-class fleet oiler and replenishes strike group ships while underway.

It was also noted that the incident did not take place inside the recently established “Maritime Security Patrol Area”, a zone in the Gulf of Aden to focus on piracy.

Umm...I already posted that same incident earlier in this thread with a CNN link.
 
Looks like Russia is flexing its muscles to do something positive this time. I hope this means that the VDQ will also be relieved after that extension.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080926/ap_on_re_eu/eu_russia_somalia_piracy

Russia sends ship to Somali coast to fight piracy
By MIKE ECKEL, Associated Press Writer
57 minutes ago


Russia's navy dispatched a warship to Somalia's coast, officials said Friday, a day after pirates there carried out their boldest attack yet — the capture of a Ukrainian vessel manned with Russian and Ukranian crew and loaded with 33 tanks and ammunition bound for Kenya.

Russian navy spokesman Capt. Igor Dygalo said in a statement that the frigate Neustrashimy left the Russia's Baltic port of Baltiisk on Wednesday. The statement did not specifically mention the seizure of the Ukrainian ship, which happened Thursday.

Dygalo did not answer calls that The Associated Press made to his cell phone later Friday.

Ukrainian Defense Minister Yury Yekhanurov, meanwhile, said that the ship, the Faina, was carrying 33 Russian T-72 tanks and a substantial quantity of ammunition and spare parts. Yekhanurov said the tanks were sold in accordance with international law, according to Larisa Mudrak, a spokeswoman for Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko.

U.S. ships in the area were aware of the seizure of the Ukranian ship and were "monitoring the situation," said Lt. Nate Christensen a spokesman for the U.S. Navy's 5th Fleet based in Bahrain.


"Obviously, we are deeply concerned," Christensen told The Associated Press. "We have ships in the area and we are monitoring the situation closely. Piracy is an international problem and it requires an international solution."

He was unable to provide more specifics because of the security issues involved, he said.

A Kenyan government spokesman, Alfred Mutua, confirmed that the East African nation's military had ordered the tanks and spare parts and said Kenya had made such a huge order of tanks as part of a two-year rearmament program for the military.

"We will do whatever it takes to secure the ship," Mutua told The Associated Press when asked whether Kenya will send a naval vessel to intercept the hijacked vessel.

He added that the cargo was insured, but "the responsibility of the insured cargo rests with the shipper."

A person who answered the phone at Ukrainian state-controlled arms dealer Ukrspetsexport, which brokered the sale, refused to comment about the Ukrainian vessel, and said all requests for information must be submitted in writing.

Ukrainian officials and an anti-piracy watchdog said 21 crew members were aboard the seized ship, and Ukraine's Foreign Ministry said the crew included three Russians.

Mikhail Voitenko, editor-in-chief of the journal "Naval Bulletin-Sovfrakht" said in televised comments that the ship sailed under a Belize flag and the operator is a Ukrainian company based in the Black Sea port of Odessa. Ukrainian news agencies identified the ship operator as a company called Tomex Team.

U.S. Defense Department spokesman Bryan Whitman said the U.S. was concerned about the attack and noted that the U.S. military has assisted foreign countries in previous instances of piracy.

"I think we're looking at the full range of options here," said Whitman. "A ship carrying cargo of that nature being hijacked off the coast of Somalia is something that should concern us, and it does concern us."

Roger Middleton, a researcher at London's Chatham House, said it was unlikely the pirates knew there were tanks aboard the Faina, and he said unloading the cargo would be very difficult.

"Most of their attacks are based on opportunity. So if they see something that looks attackable and looks captureable, they'll attack it," he told AP.

"I'm not sure how helpful such a high-profile cargo will be for them. It makes them much more vulnerable," he said. "I'd imagine they're quite worried."

Dygalo said Russia's navy would periodically send ships to piracy prone areas to protect Russian citizens and Russian ships. He said the frigate set sail on Wednesday "with the aim of providing for a naval presence in a number of oceans and sea regions."

According to the British-based Jane's Information Group, the Neustrashimy is armed with surface-to-air missiles, 100 mm guns and anti-submarine torpedoes.

Yushchenko, meanwhile, ordered unspecified measures to secure the release of the crew.

The hijacking brings the number of attacks off Somalia to 61 this year, and pirates are now holding 14 ships and more than 300 crew members, said Noel Choong, who heads the International Maritime Bureau's piracy reporting center based in Malaysia.

Middleton said it was unclear how the pirates might react if confronted by military action, noting that they have fled from authorities in the past. On the other hand, he said, they are usually well-armed and organized and are based in an unstable country — Somalia.

"It could potentially get pretty messy," he said.

___

Associated Press writers Olga Bondaruk in Kiev, Jennifer Quinn in London, Tom Malitti in Nairobi and Lolita Baldor in Washington contributed to this report.
 
I think the pirates are about to find out just how brutal the Russians can be.....talk about stepping into it.... ::)
 
CougarDaddy said:
Looks like Russia is flexing its muscles to do something positive this time. I hope this means that the VDQ will also be relieved after that extension.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080926/ap_on_re_eu/eu_russia_somalia_piracy

A Russian warship in the area will almost certainly take an aggressive stance against any pirates, particularly if Russian vessels/cargo/crew are involved, however I don't think it will mean much for the VDQ.  The VDQ has been performing a very specific task, escorting ships with WFP cargo to Somali ports.  When detached from SNMG-1 the VDQ came under Op ALTAIR but it does not seem to have been placed under CTF-150 control though there probably was/is coordination with them especially since CTF-150 was commanded by a Canadian when the VDQ's task started.

I doubt that the Neustrashimy will join CTF-150; it may not be in the Russian interest particularly since it may restrict some freedom of action.  Similarly I doubt that the Russians will have much incentive to provide escort to the WFP ships (unless one of them is a chartered Russian vessel).  As this is a new wrinkle in the Somali pirate saga, I wonder whether unilateral Russian action (of that uniquely excessive Russian flavour) in Somali territorial waters or on its territory will trigger any international condemnation.
 
I doubt it....if the Somali's are to learn a lesson the hard way, and the Russians are going to deliver it, they probably figure it best to stand on the sidelines making polite noises all the while understanding that this is what they want....
 
This is what the Ruskies are sending 

Neustrashimy_Ultim.jpg


 
Coming from the Baltic it will take awhile to get to the AO. I wonder why they didnt deploy a ship from the Black Sea or Med ?

Here's a pic of the Faina.

Ship+Photo+FAINA.jpg


Ship+Photo+MARABOU.jpg
 
News update: the USN Destroyer USS HOWARD has located the Ukrainian ship and is standing by 1,000 yards away from it, IIRC. Looks like we won't be seeing that Russian destroyer in action anytime soon.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080927/ap_on_re_af/af_somalia_piracy;_ylt=AoAwXIjN8sQ7PKuI4V4Meums0NUE

US destroyer watching hijacked ship off Somalia
By MOHAMED OLAD HASSAN, Associated Press Writer
Sat Sep 27, 3:50 PM ET

A U.S. destroyer off the coast of Somalia closed in Saturday on a hijacked Ukrainian ship loaded with tanks and ammunition, watching it to ensure the pirates who seized it do not try to remove any cargo or crew.

As Russian and American ships pursued the hijackers of the Ukrainian-operated vessel, pirates seized another ship off Somalia's coast, an international anti-piracy group said.

The Greek tanker with a crew of 19 is carrying refined petroleum from Europe to the Middle East. It was ambushed Friday in the Gulf of Aden, said Noel Choong, who heads the International Maritime Bureau's piracy reporting center based in Malaysia. He said pirates chased and fired at the ship before boarding it.

In Somalia, a man claiming to be spokesman of the pirates holding the Ukrainian ship said the hijackers want $35 million to release the vessel. But there was no way to immediately verify his claim that he represented the pirates.

On Thursday, pirates seized the Ukrainian ship Faina en route to Kenya with 33 Russian-built T-72 tanks and a substantial quantity of ammunition and spare parts. Russia's navy said Friday it had dispatched a warship to the area, and the United States said American naval ships were tracking the Ukrainian ship with special concern because of the weaponry on board.

The hijackings were the latest in a series of audacious maritime attacks off the coast of Somalia, a war-torn country that has been without a functioning government since 1991.

A U.S. defense official said the destroyer USS Howard is pursuing the hijacked Ukrainian vessel and is now within a few thousand yards of it. The hijacked ship is anchored a few miles off the Somalia coast, said the official who spoke on condition of anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the situation.

The destroyer is watching to make sure the pirates do not try to remove anything, the official added.

The USS Howard's Web site says it is equipped for combat operations at sea with surface-to-air missiles, Tomahawk cruise missiles, antisubmarine rockets, torpedoes, and a five-inch rapid-fire deck gun.


Kenyan government spokesman Alfred Mutua said the Faina had not yet docked at any port and was still at sea.

Kenya "is not aware of any credible (ransom) demand being made," Mutua said in statement on his Web site. He said Kenya "does not and will not negotiate with international criminals, pirates and terrorists."

Ukraine's Foreign Ministry said the Kenyan Defense Department was using its contacts to try to resolve the problem. It said Kenyan authorities were sharing information with Somalia, Ukraine, Russia, the U.S. and Britain in an effort to secure the swift release of the ship and its crew.

A man who spoke to the Associated Press in Somalia by telephone and claimed to be a spokesman for the pirates said they were seeking a ransom.

"We want the Kenyan government to negotiate with us about a $35 million ransom we want for the release of the ship and the cargo without any other intervention," said the man, who identified himself as Ali Yare Abdulkadir. "If not, we will do what we can and off load the small arms and take them away."

Abdulkadir, who local residents in the northeastern Somali region of Puntland said represented the pirates, declined to reveal his whereabouts. He said the ship is somewhere along Somalia's northeastern coast and warned against any military action to liberate it.

"Any one who tries it will be responsible for the consequences," Abdulkadir said.

A Russian Web site posted what it said was an audio recording of a telephone conversation with the Ukrainian ship's first mate. He said the hijackers are seeking a ransom and have anchored close to the Somali shore.

There was no way to immediately confirm the authenticity of the report on Web site Life.ru. Calls to the phone number listed on the site went to an answering machine at the publisher of two established tabloids that have reportedly reliably on news in the past — one of them also called Life.

On the recording, a man who identified himself as first mate Viktor Nikolsky said the hijackers were asking for a ransom but he did not know how much. Life.ru showed images of what it said were the Russian passports for both Nikolsky and the ship's captain, Vladimir Kolobkov.

Nikolsky said there were 35 people on the ship — 21 of them crew — and most were being held in a single overheated room, he added. Nobody aboard the Faina was injured, but the captain was suffering from heatstroke and his condition was "not so good," the man identified as Nikolsky said. It was unclear exactly when the purported conversation took place.

Ukrainian officials had said there were 21 crew members aboard — 17 Ukrainians, three Russians and a Latvian.

Nikolsky said the ship was anchored near the Somali town of Hobyo and that two other apparently hijacked ships were nearby. Hobyo is in the central region of Mudug, south of Puntland. It is a natural port and does not have any facilities.

Kenyan Defense Department spokesman Bogita Ongeri said the Ukrainian vessel was seized in international waters in the Gulf of Aden. He said that the pirates hijacked the ship beyond 200 nautical miles away from the coast of Puntland. Two hundred nautical miles in maritime law mark the end of a country's territorial waters.

Long a hazard for maritime shippers — particularly in the Indian Ocean and its peripheries — high-seas piracy has triggered greater alarm since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks on the United States because of its potential as a funding and supply source for global terrorism.

Pirate attacks worldwide have surged this year and Africa remains the world's top piracy hotspot, with 24 reported attacks in Somalia and 18 in Nigeria this year, according to the International Maritime Bureau's piracy reporting center.

French President Nicolas Sarkozy this month called on other nations to move boldly against pirates, calling the phenomenon "a genuine industry of crime."

____

Web site for USS Howard:

http://www.howard.navy.mil/default.aspx

____

Associated Press writers Mohamed Sheikh Nor and Salad Duhul in Mogadishu, Somalia; Tom Maliti in Nairobi, Kenya; Steve Gutterman in Moscow; Vijay Joshi in Singapore; Lolita C. Baldor in Washington; and Yana Sedova in Kiev, Ukraine contributed to this report.
 
Piracy is a political problem as well as a naval one:

http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/09/us-navy-pirates.html#more

U.S. Navy: Pirates Not Our Problem (Updated)
By Noah Shachtman EmailSeptember 26, 2008 | 4:05:00 PMCategories: Africa, Ships and Subs 

X102136776097757469_2Galrahn blogs about naval matters at Information Dissemination.

The U.S. Navy says its mission today is to keep sea lanes open to commerce. Then pirates seize dozens of ships off the Horn of Africa -- including ones allegedly loaded with tanks. And the Navy responds by essentially throwing its hands in the air.

The U.S. Navy said the international naval force CTF-150 -- with forces from Britain, France, Canada, Germany, Pakistan and the United States -- had stopped more then 12 attacks since May. Unfortunately, there have also been six ships seized by pirates so far just in September: a French yacht, an Egyptian dry cargo ship, a South Korean cargo ship, a Greek bulk carrier, a Hong Kong bulk carrier, and now, a Ukrainian Ro Ro reportedly carrying T-72 tanks.

"The coalition does not have the resources to provide 24-hour protection for the vast number of merchant vessels in the region," Combined Maritime Forces commander, U.S. vice admiral Bill Gortney tells Reuters. "The shipping companies must take measures to defend their vessels and their crews."

Taking a historical view, it pains me to read this. One of the primary reasons he United States of America dumped the Articles of Confederation and wrote the Constitution of the United States was to gain the power of taxation. And the primary reason the founding fathers needed taxation was so the country could build a Navy for the specific purpose of fighting pirates.

I also find it very frustrating that last Thursday, the Admirals stood in front of the American people in Durham and discussed in detail the role of naval power to protect the global system to insure the free flow of trade. Yet here we have a clear example of trade disruption on the seas, and the U.S. Navy basically tells ship owners they can't solve the problem.

I'm not saying this is a simple issue.  Stopping piracy in the Gulf of Aden is not easily done. But you have to ask: why the U.S. Navy is not committed to stopping piracy in the 21st century? That question is a political question, not a strategic question of the Navy, or a tactical question regarding resources. It represents one of those political issues no one ever running for national political office gets asked about. The Navy correctly points out there is no threat to global system from Somalian piracy -- that piracy represents a minor disruption that barely shows up on the big picture. At least, that's the case today. But piracy will likely grow, until our political leaders give the problem more attention.

Meanwhile, the Russians are sending a frigate to Somalia.

-- Galrahn, cross-posted to Information Dissimenation

UPDATE: Noah here. This article in last week's National (UAE) newspaper provides some extremely helpful background on what this CTF-150 outfit is -- and isn't -- capable of doing. First of all CT-150 only has "eight or nine ships at any one time and [is] given the task of covering a huge area, including the North Arabian Sea, Gulf of Aden, Gulf of Oman, Red Sea and the Indian Ocean." So it's spread very, very thin.

    Last month the coalition came up with a solution to the problem of having too few ships – reducing the volume of water they have to cover. The U.S. Navy’s Central Command at Manama, Bahrain, has now set up a Maritime Security Patrol Area in the Gulf of Aden – essentially, a narrow corridor… 1,000km long and about 10km wide… which is being patrolled by CTF-150, overflown by coalition aircraft and along which all commercial shipping and yachts are strongly advised to pass.

    …It was not, however, a long-term answer… Piracy, says Lt Nathan Christensen, a spokesman with the US Fifth Fleet… "is a problem that starts ashore and it’s an international problem that requires an international solution. It requires regional governments to get involved. We’re going to take a short-term responsibility [but] we are not the long-term solution to this problem."
 
In the papers this morning.  The pirates are asking 35MM$ for the ship and it's military hardware.
Expecting trouble from the owners, they are moving in accomplices to prepare defensive positions

More to follow - I guess
 
Back
Top