• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Taliban Disses Time Magazine Cover

The Bread Guy

Moderator
Staff member
Directing Staff
Subscriber
Donor
Reaction score
4,275
Points
1,260
Well, if the Taliban doesn't like this ....
a_time_cover_0809.jpg
.... that makes me like the cover even more for telling a bit of the truth the bad guys don't seem to want out there.

This response from the Taliban's English web site (screen capture of full statement also here at a non-terrorist site):
Time  magazine has recently published a picture of an Afghan women Aisha, and described her horrifying story which is connected to the Taliban under the title ‘Afghan women and the return of the Taliban’.

Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan rejects this fabrication by the Americans, who are publishing these lies to divert attention of the people from their clear and disgraceful defeat.

This propaganda by Times magazine has shown the whole world the lengths world media will go to please America even at the cost of their Journalistic integrity.

This picture published by Times magazine and the barbaric story wrongly attached to Islamic Emirate is not only false but publishing these images are against the morals and ethics of professional journalism. A lot of journalists worldwide have condemned this act of Times magazine and called it a crime against journalism.

As far as the story of Aisha is concerned, Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan has condemned this barbaric, inhumane and unislamic act and declare that this case has never been forwarded to any court or persons of Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan.

Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan uses Shariate law to solve any internal or human right issues. Shariat law promotes peace and justice to the society, not hatered and cruelty.

In sacred Islamic law, cutting of human ears and noses whether the human is alive or dead is illegal and prohibited. In many hadith from Muhammad PBUH, cutting of noses, ears and lips of a dead unbeliever is prohibited so how can Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan carry this act out especially when the person to whom it is done is alive and Muslim. Under shariate law if someone carries out this heinous act, the same thing will be done to the criminal that carried out this act.

Nevertheless, we sympathize with our sister Aisha and call this atrocious act a crime against humanity and against Shariate law.

We call on Times and other western media to stop trampling on their own moral principles, just to hide and divert people’s attention from Americas military and political defeat by publishing such fabrications.

We also call on Afghani media to stop spreading the lies of Islam hating western media by becoming their translators. Journalism is an important duty so stop wrongly using it.

More on this here.
 
This picture published by Times magazine and the barbaric story wrongly attached to Islamic Emirate is not only false but publishing these images are against the morals and ethics of professional journalism. A lot of journalists worldwide have condemned this act of Times magazine and called it a crime against journalism.

As far as the story of Aisha is concerned, Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan has condemned this barbaric, inhumane and unislamic act and declare that this case has never been forwarded to any court or persons of Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan.

Really!!??

I anxiously await their condemnation then of all those web-uploaded Al Qaida decapitation videos, and the videos of their prior Taliban regime itself executing women, sans trial, in their very own soccer stadiums ... right after they ensured they ripped off her burquha to shame her one last time.

 
More in keeping with the Taliban's ethical values and morals:

10 aid workers killed in Afghanistan

Taliban claims responsibility; says workers were spying

Ten members of a medical team, including six Americans, were shot and killed by militants as they were returning from providing eye treatment and other health care in remote villages of northern Afghanistan, a spokesman for the team said Saturday.

Dirk Frans, director of the International Assistance Mission, said one German, one Briton and two Afghans also were a part of the team that made the two-week trip to Nuristan province. They drove to the province, left their vehicles and hiked for hours over mountainous terrain to reach the Parun valley in the province's northwest.

Taliban spokesman Zabiullah Mujahid told The Associated Press in Pakistan that they killed the foreigners because they were "spying for the Americans" and "preaching Christianity."

Frans said the International Assistance Mission is registered as a non-profit Christian organization but it does not proselytize.

"This tragedy negatively impacts our ability to continue serving the Afghan people as IAM has been doing since 1966," according to a statement released by the charity. "We hope it will not stop our work that benefits over a quarter of a million Afghans each year."

The team, made up of doctors, nurses and logistics personnel, was attacked as it was returning to Kabul following a two-week mission in Nuristan, Frans said. They had decided to travel through Badakhshan province to return to the capital because they thought that would be the safest route, Frans said.

Among the dead was team leader Tom Little, an optometrist from Delmar, N.Y., who has been working in Afghanistan for more than 30 years, Frans said.

Little was expelled by the Taliban government in August 2001 after the arrest of eight Christian aid workers — two Americans and six Germans — for allegedly trying to convert Afghans to Christianity. He returned to Afghanistan after the Taliban government was toppled in November 2001 by U.S.-backed forces.

Frans said he lost contact with Little on Wednesday. On Friday, a third Afghan member of the team, who survived the attack, called to report the killings. A fourth Afghan member of the team was not killed because he took a different route home because he had family in Jalalabad, Frans said.

According to Frans, two members of team worked for International Assistance Mission, two were former IAM workers and four others were affiliated with other organizations, which he did not disclose. He said five of the Americans were men and one was a woman. The Briton and German also were women.

Gen. Agha Noor Kemtuz, police chief in Badakhshan province, said the victims, who had been shot, were found Friday next to three bullet-riddled four-wheel-drive vehicles in Kuran Wa Munjan district. He said villagers had warned the team that the area was dangerous, but the foreigners said they were doctors and weren't afraid. He said local police said about 10 gunmen robbed them and killed them one by one.

He said the two Afghans were interpreters from Bamiyan and Panjshir provinces. A third Afghan man, who had been travelling with the group, survived.

"He told me he was shouting and reciting the holy Qur'an and saying 'I am Muslim. Don't kill me,"' Kemtuz said.

Geez, did these 10 Aid workers get the benefit of "court of Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan" as per this statement in the original posted article??

As far as the story of Aisha is concerned, Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan has condemned this barbaric, inhumane and unislamic act and declare that this case has never been forwarded to any court or persons of Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan.
 
I am glad that someone has finally posted this Time magazine cover.  I'm afraid I am a bit of caveman when it comes to actually accomplishing that kind of feat here and would have done it myself days ago.

milnews has been great in posting the animal's POV and I do at times read what they say.  Of late, I have noticed however that some of these postings have become almost Maddison Avenue in quality compared to the usual fanatical BS and jabbering I was used to from those things.  Who the hell have they hired?  Whomever it is, they are polished in their delivery as one would expect of a fairly competent publicist.  It's like coming across a talking dog all of a sudden, I am not sure I like it or comfortable with it.
 
Glad someone's reading some of the bad guy stuff  ;)

The Taliban's stuff has been increasing in volume (esp. reports of attacks), but I don't see a qualitative difference in the latest statements outside of specific alleged attacks.  For example, check out all the typos (it's "TIME" not "Times", for example) from previous statements.  While it appears there's no shortage of computer-savvy types doing the web and video work, English proofreading still isn't a priority for the TB.

It IS proof, though, that someone in the system reads the papers and checks out the internet (further evidence that there's no reason why the Wikileaks material can't be used as an assassination database by the Taliban), and is happy to get some comment out there (faster than we can, sadly, because they can make stuff up as they go).  I'd say it's more a question of a better research department. 
 
Hell, even my posts are not always not up to snuff.  I am not always successful in proof reading too, and of course spell check is not a grammar check.  It just strikes me that from time to time they come off sounding intelligeable and not like Opie ranting on Family Guy as they usually do.  When the Stones played in Halifax, Keith Richards sounded clear and concise in his speech unlike the gabble I have heard in Docs before.

Still, if they don't like the Time story, it must be worth while and hits home. 
 
One of our big failings as the western world has been to clump all of our current enemies into one homogeneous lump titled "Taliban" who all live by the same rules.

We are actually fighting several different enemies, all with their own ideologies and motivations for wanting to kill us.

It is quite possible that one group of insurgents in Afghanistan commits these sorts of acts regularly (as with the acid on the faces of the school girls, etc), and that another group is strictly against those sorts of things happening.

Did the events at Abu Gahrib happen?  Yes.  Do you condone those sorts of events?  Likely not.  And we're far more homogeneous than they are.  It would be a mistake for us not to understand that, as in any war it's to your peril not to understand your enemy.
 
First I hear about how they have access to heat-seeking missiles they use to shoot down helicopters, and now they have a dedicated PR department? Far cry from the Kalashinikov toting infidel haters they are normally seen as. It seems they have been underestimated.

PS - I have also been reading the Taliban Propaganda. Interesting stuff.
 
opp550 said:
.......... It seems they have been underestimated.

Only by those not in the know.........Which is the majority of the Public.  The troops don't underestimate them at all.
 
opp550 said:
First I hear about how they have access to heat-seeking missiles they use to shoot down helicopters, and now they have a dedicated PR department? Far cry from the Kalashinikov toting infidel haters they are normally seen as. It seems they have been underestimated.

PS - I have also been reading the Taliban Propaganda. Interesting stuff.

Just because you haven't heard about it in the media doesn't mean they didn't have the means to do so prior to 911.

The Taliban was a regime that had tanks, missiles, AA weaponry, choppers etc...including ministries that had a PR branch as well. Most were destroyed when the Northern Alliance went on the offensive in Oct 2001 after 911 and were backed by the US.

Those that did survive fled to Pakistan and are still at work, with a bit of support from that country's political establishments no doubt.

The media, for the most part,  only zeros in on stories that will cause either a debate or sensationalize an issue, not report actual hard, substantiated facts.

Do some reading and you'll be surprised at what has been left out of the limelight. Don't read anything from the CBC, Steve Staples or Sunil Ram as it's pretty much tripe. Try the BBC News Service as they have the most accurate and balanced reporting for the MSM.

Regards
 
opp550 said:
First I hear about how they have access to heat-seeking missiles they use to shoot down helicopters ....
More on what's available in open sources on the Taliban's anti-air work here.

As DP said ....
Der Panzerkommandant.... said:
The media, for the most part,  only zeros in on stories that will cause either a debate or sensationalize an issue, not report actual hard, substantiated facts.
.... which is why you don't hear as much of the stuff that needs some digging.
 
Der Panzerkommandant.... said:
...Try the BBC News Service as they have the most accurate and balanced reporting for the MSM.

I would also argue for (believe it or not) Al Jazeera English's page on SW Asia.

http://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia/default.html

AJ gets a bad rap because they air things like westerners getting killed, but it's not the news agency themselves doing these things.  I find the stories themselves far more objective than the typical big ones like CBC, CNN, or BBC.

Mind you, there are some messages getting sent (banners to click on with back stories about bad things that Israel did, etc), but the stories themselves are always opinion-less.
 
Petamocto said:
I would also argue for (believe it or not) Al Jazeera English's page on SW Asia.

I find the stories themselves far more objective than the typical big ones like CBC, CNN, or BBC.

I have to agree with you.  I started to look at this site with a jaundiced eye, but was also surprised on how balanced their stories can be unlike some of the big name western sites.
 
A bit of follow-up on the original picture - the young woman in question has received some help.  Blackfive.net has posted an ABC News video of how she's doing now:
http://www.blackfive.net/main/2010/10/why-we-fight.html
If Diane Sawyer had as much to do with this as B5.net says, congrats to her!  Also, well done to all who helped out.
 
Such a good follow up to the story.  I like feel good stories.  I wish her all the best.
 
Yes, best wishes indeed to this young woman  :)

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/afghanistan/8059872/Taliban-oppression-poster-girl-unveils-new-nose.html
 
owa said:
Such a good follow up to the story.  I like feel good stories.  I wish her all the best.
+1.
Must make her so happy to see a pretty face when she looks in the mirror.
I'm glad for her.
 
I saw the story on the Daily Mail website the otherday.  I was nice to see her smiling and to see that she will be taken care of.  Pretty girl, even prettier now.
 
Let's hope she has some protection when she gets home, lest the bad guys want to make an example of someone who dares defy cultural custom.
 
Back
Top