• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Syria Superthread [merged]

At the risk of repeating myself, there is no "good" or "useful" military response to a Syrian domestic problem,* the best diplomatic solution is isolation: close all (possible)** land, sea and air borders with Syria - no one gets in or out and, especially no aid, of any kind for any faction, gets in. Let the Syrians sort themselves out however long it takes and however desperate the suffering of the innocents becomes. Then do the same to its neighbours and their neighbours, too ...

The Assad regime is backed strongly by Iran, Hezbollah, N. Korea, China, Russia and partially by Iraq. Closing the borders will only increase the suffering on the civilian population or those trying to seek refuge out but will have little effect on the Assad government or military (just like we've witnessed - 1 year and the tanks still rolling, artillery is now being used).

What happens to Syria is very pivotal to the security of the world today (yes, the whole world). Take two scenarios:

1. Regime controls the uprising (though far fetched): The Assad regime will emerge stronger, more bitter. They'll Allie themselves with the countries and groups above. They'll arm themselves to the teeth and Nuclear Weapons will be something they seek especially if Iran ends-up acquiring the technology. You now have a mad man willing to destroy his own country/people at the doorsteps of Turkey/Israel. Significantly increasing tension in the area. This will spill over to Iraq, Lebanon and most likely ignite a cold war that will eventually turn into another war in the region.

2. Do nothing and the Opposition wins: The more time this uprising takes, the more chance radicals and extremists get to pray on the soul of the weak or those whom experience trauma/loss. We're already witnessing that elements of Al-Qaeda is beginning to shift its focus from Iraq to Syria. This is now their new found holy war. In some of the neighbourhoods in Homs, there are already sensitivities between members of the FSA (Free Syrian Army) and other armed groups. It will quickly disintegrate into a religious civil war that will engulf with it Iraq, Lebanon, Jordan, Israel and perhaps Turkey.

All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
 
Tiamo said:
The Assad regime is backed strongly by Iran, Hezbollah, N. Korea, China, Russia and partially by Iraq. Closing the borders will only increase the suffering on the civilian population or those trying to seek refuge ~ which is an unfortunate (unavoidable?) side effect of doing anything or nothing, it's a neutral factor out but will have little effect on the Assad government or military (just like we've witnessed - 1 year and the tanks still rolling, artillery is now being used).

What happens to Syria is very pivotal to the security of the world today (yes, the whole world). Take two scenarios:

1. Regime controls the uprising (though far fetched): The Assad regime will emerge stronger, more bitter. They'll Allie themselves with the countries and groups above. They'll arm themselves to the teeth and Nuclear Weapons will be something they seek especially if Iran ends-up acquiring the technology. You now have a mad man willing to destroy his own country/people at the doorsteps of Turkey/Israel. Significantly increasing tension in the area. This will spill over to Iraq, Lebanon and most likely ignite a cold war that will eventually turn into another war in the region. And this is a problem? How, exactly? All we need do is stand back and do nothing ... except, maybe, pick up a couple of million Israeli refugees.

2. Do nothing and the Opposition wins: The more time this uprising takes, the more chance radicals and extremists get to pray on the soul of the weak or those whom experience trauma/loss. We're already witnessing that elements of Al-Qaeda is beginning to shift its focus from Iraq to Syria. This is now their new found holy war. In some of the neighbourhoods in Homs, there are already sensitivities between members of the FSA (Free Syrian Army) and other armed groups. It will quickly disintegrate into a religious civil war that will engulf with it Iraq, Lebanon, Jordan, Israel and perhaps Turkey. See my previous comment.

All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Agreed, in principle, but sometimes doing nothing is a good choice ...



 
Free Syrian Army claim French and US assistance- Telegraph.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQi_TLyj46s
 
.... on the need for military force - from Hansard (highlights mine):
Hon. Hugh Segal:  Honourable senators, the constant bombardment of civilian sites and communities by Syrian armed forces evokes every possible aspect of the responsibility to protect doctrine proclaimed some years ago by the United Nations on the advice of a task force in which Canada and its then foreign minister, Mr. Axworthy, played a major role.

The engagement in Libya was appropriate and necessary, and Canadian and allied forces, both at sea and in the air, performed a serious humanitarian mission in keeping Gadhafi's air force and artillery from killing Libyan civilians. There, NATO had allies and partners in the Arab League, some of whom flew missions alongside our own pilots.

The Arab League has tried valiantly to seek a non-violent solution to the present violence in Syria. Armed military state violence against women, children, defenceless men and journalists has continued unabated. Not even the Red Crescent and the Red Cross could be allowed assured access to Homs, where so many state-sponsored, military mass murders took place, a city without a single military target. The Arab League is now talking about an Arab-led stabilization force. Canada should encourage NATO to support such a force and to make independent plans to use air assets to contain and restrain the Syrian military, which seems to have no difficulty bombing their own people at will.

Senator McCain of Arizona is quite correct when he said yesterday, "Time is running out. Assad's forces are on the march." Without a readiness to deploy air assets against Syrian government forces, the carnage will continue. The time for a double standard with the people of Syria on the losing end all the time has passed. Refugees are already piling over the Lebanese and Turkish borders. Russia and China have some serious answering to do in view of the deaths that have multiplied since their offensive veto at the Security Council, a veto that raised self-interested cynicism in that body to a new level.

Canada should act in concert with our Turkish, American and Arab League partners and seek a substantive joint Arab-led military engagement in defence of the people of Syria and their right to self-determination. The time for action has come; the time for inaction has passed.
 
milnews.ca said:
[Senator Hugh Segal agrees with McCain...] on the need for military force - from Hansard (highlights mine):


"A substantive joint Arab-led military engagement" might be useful. Many of the Arab nations have sunstantial and modern military forces, and they ought not to need any Western ground forces, not a single soldier. Perhaps there will be a role for some Western naval and air support (based in israel?  ::) ) but, if we are going to help, we should aim to do less than in Libya, thereby forcing the Arab League to do more. In the long run it is a regional problem and only a regional solution will work.
 
Yeah, but political considerations are everything.

The US via NATO will rise to the bait. The Arabs may have the equipment, but the quality of their combat capabilities leaves much to be desired.

I would love to see the Arab nations take this one on.....it would give them some much needed credibility......
 
I don't think armies need to be involved. In fact, it may get more complicated if NATO or the Arab League sends their armies on the ground. What the rebels need are weaponry and some training. What had worked in Libya could very well work in Syria.

If you pay close attention to the army defections that have been occurring over the past year, many of the defectors are officers. There is a focus by the FSA on attracting as many officers as they can. Following some of the larger scale operations, it is clear they're well planned and executed (like the one attacking Aleppo's most feared security headquarters in early dawn hours).

I've heard of some FSA groups requiring anyone to join to have some military experience and had finished their middle school studies.

The major obstacle to the FSA is finding the proper weapons to counter attack tanks on the ground. Russia and Iran have been arming the regime side in hope it could suppress the revolution. On the other hand, the rebels are dependent on smuggling light weaponry and things they would seize during raids.
 
Many, many years ago, when my father returned from a year long stint with UNTSO/UNDOF he said he had a solution to the problems in the Mideast.  Close the place off (Nod to you Edward) then give everyone, man woman or child a baseball bat and let them go at it.  Once all the noise stops take a look to see what's left.  Last person standing gets passed a Broom and dust pan and told to clean up the mess.  15 years later I went over to the Golan.  Nothing had changed all that much.  Well the Lebanese Civil war (part 1) had ended but pretty much everything else had stayed they same.

Outside of being disinterested observers to make sure they keep the fight in their own play ground we have no dog in this fight, be it Syria, Libya, Tunisia et al.

My question to people that ask me is, "How or why is this our problem?"  No one has given me an answer that would justify the potential risks.  I suppose we could through this whole mess into the lap of the British and French as well as Turkey as they contributed to creating the problem, but that wouldn't get us very far either.

Lets mind our own business on this one shall we? 
 
Amen to that. Containment also keeps the embittered losers (or winners) from spilling the conflict over the borders to other nations. Here is the take of Walter Russel Mead on the current situation (and if you read closely, an affirmation on why we should not be assisting the rebel faction):

http://blogs.the-american-interest.com/wrm/2012/03/18/syria-descending-toward-madness/

Syria Descending Toward Madness

This morning there was a car bomb in Aleppo. Yesterday saw two explosions in Damascus with heavy casualties. Syria is descending into the kind of communal madness that produces bloodbaths and anarchy; it is looking more like Iraq and civil war era Lebanon every day.

The violence seems to be coming both more sectarian and more personal: killings across religious and ethnic lines intensify the hatred and suspicion these groups feel for one another, and waves of killings are launched as each round of murder inspires the relatives and friends of the dead with the lust for revenge.

The killing could go on for some time and become even worse. The Syrian opposition remains inchoate, factionalized and incompetent a year after the protests began. The Syrian government shows no signs of being able either to crush its opponents or compromise with them. The “international community” is as usual divided, risk averse and given to blending fine words with shabby deeds. The neighbors have no idea what to do.

The Syrian government and its opposition are each their own worst enemy. Butcher Assad is the worst of all combinations: a bumbling murderer. He can and will kill, but he cannot govern. Yet the opposition has lost credibility even as Syrians put their lives on the line every day. Its inability to organize a coherent alternative to the government underlines the key point of Assad propaganda: that the only alternative to the goon squad currently in power is anarchy and, perhaps, genocidal wars of revenge by fanatical sectarian killers.

The longer this tragedy continues, the more dangerous it becomes — for Syrians and for others in the region. A new wave of fanatical sectarian zealots is emerging from the horror of Syria: there is no better recruiting ground for the agents of Al-Qaeda like movements than a fight of this kind. The violence shows signs of spreading into Lebanon and Iraq. Not even Turkey is immune from the spillover of passion (to say nothing of refugees).

At the moment, there seem to be three possible outcomes. The government can fall, with or without outside forces supporting the rebels, and the rebels can establish a reasonably stable government in place of the Assads. The government can crush the rebels, going on to rule a sullen and embittered, but cowed, population for some time to come. Or the current violence can continue indefinitely, going through phases of greater and lesser intensity.

At the moment, the latter scenario of indefinite chaos and bloodshed seems most likely — either in a country divided between rebels and the current government, or in a weak and divided country following the overthrow of the Assads and the failure of the opposition to establish a viable regime in place of the Baathist nightmare now in control.

The Russian and Chinese position (of encouraging a peace process leading to some kind of compromise between government and opposition) has the merit of recognizing that the current state of affairs is both dangerous and destabilizing. It also recognizes that the regime is stronger and the opposition is uglier, weaker and less competent than the humanitarian hawks in the west have wanted to admit.

The Russian-Chinese initiative, however, is not likely to succeed. Neither the government nor the opposition are ready to settle.
Worse, the ugliest, most sectarian wing of the Syrian opposition is going to have a lot of support. Sunni chauvinists fighting the sectarian war against heresy and Shiism can draw on support from more mainstream figures in the Gulf who hope to defeat Iran in Syria and then use a Sunni Syria to further pressure Iran and its Shiite allies in Iraq. This is not a movement that seeks democracy or liberalism; it is an old fashioned (and powerful) mix of sectarian hatred and Realpolitik.

Sensing a Sunni surge across the region, the sectarians aren’t ready to compromise over Syria. Obsessed both by the Iranian threat and by what looks to some like US unwillingness to confront it, the Realpolitikers also aren’t in a compromising mood. That combination, with or without open official backing, is fully capable of keeping enough money and support flowing to keep the rebellion alive as long as the Syrians are willing to fight.

The most likely outlook at this point: continuing and even worsening violence, with a growing potential for contagion in Lebanon and Iraq. The best policy option for the US: watch, wait and work with others to try to build the Syrian opposition into a viable political force that at least conceivably could govern the country with some kind of minimal effectiveness. That, and do our best to monitor the financial and arms flows to understand new terror networks that may be taking shape — and keep a close eye on the people involved.
 
Heavy fighting reported in Damascus.Bad news for the regime if they cant keep the rebels out.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-17425062

A firefight is reported to have erupted in Syria's capital, Damascus, between the rebel Free Syria Army and the forces of President Bashar al-Assad.

Witnesses say the sound of machine-guns and rocket-propelled grenades can be heard from the district of al-Mezze.

The neighbourhood, in the centre of Damascus, is home to several security facilities and is one of the most heavily guarded parts of the capital.

In January the Free Syria Army briefly seized several Damascus suburbs.

Al-Mezze has been the scene of large anti-government protests.

"There is fighting near Hamada supermarket and the sound of explosions there and elsewhere in the neighbourhood," a resident told Reuters news agency.

"Security police have blocked several side streets and the street lighting has been cut off."

Opposition activist Amer al Sadeq told the BBC's World Today programme he had spoken to a contact in al-Mezze who reported four blasts within five minutes and then heavy gunfire.

The incident follows bomb blasts in Damascus and the northern city of Aleppo over the weekend.

On Sunday a car bomb exploded in Aleppo, killing at least two people and injuring 30 others.

A day earlier, at least 27 people were reported to have been killed and 97 wounded in two explosions in the capital.

State TV described the blasts as "terrorist" attacks.

However, activists have accused the authorities of staging incidents to discredit opposition groups.

In another development, the UK-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said security forces beat and arrested senior opposition figure Mohammed Sayyed Rassas on Sunday.

Mr Rassas, a leader of the National Co-ordinating Body for Democratic Change (NCB), had been taking part in a protest march in Damascus, the group said.

President Assad is trying to quell an increasingly armed rebellion that sprang from a fierce crackdown on peaceful pro-democracy protests a year ago.

The UN estimates that more than 8,000 people have died in the clashes.

President Assad insists his troops are fighting "armed gangs" seeking to destabilise Syria.
 
A comment on Bashar al-Assad's dilemma by Michael Ignatieff, reproduced under the Fair Dealing provisions of the Copyright Act from the Globe and Mail:

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opinions/opinion/the-parallel-universe-of-bashar-al-assad/article2374015/
The parallel universe of Bashar al-Assad

MICHAEL IGNATIEFF

Globe and Mail Update
Published Tuesday, Mar. 20, 2012

Imagine what it is like to be Bashar al-Assad, dictator of Syria. Imagine what his parallel universe looks like.

If you are Mr. Assad, you have waged war on your people for a year. You have bombed Homs into submission, shelled other cities and laid mines on your border to keep your people from going in or out.

In this looking-glass world, your security people keep telling you it is all over, bar the clean-up. But the blurry images of horror from the cellphone cameras in Aleppo and Damascus keep appearing on al-Jazeera. You wanted to impose silence and your people will not be silenced. The thugs in your security system, the mukhabarat and shebbiha, have not cracked, but neither have the people.

You counted on your ability to make Alawites, Christians and Sunnis fear each other and cling to you for fear of something worse. You have divided the exiles in opposition, true enough, but the people in the street no longer care what the political exile groups say. They are learning to speak for themselves, and what they say on the street is that they want you dead.

Your last remaining friend on Earth is Vladimir Putin. He told you to go ahead and bomb Homs, since that worked in Grozny against the Chechen rebels. Your own father, Hafez, taught you the same lesson. Make them fear you. Now you are living week to week, putting all your trust in terror.

You also know that the loyalty of Mr. Putin is not cast in stone. You are an embarrassment, but he is using you to teach the Americans a lesson, as well as the Turks, the Saudis and the Gulf Arabs. He helps you survive to secure respect for Russian power.

So much the better if the world believes you survive only thanks to Mr. Putin. In fact, it is not him, but your tank commanders, whom you depend on. Unlike the officers who betrayed Hosni Mubarak, your commanders are still willing to slaughter their own people.

This is why it was easy to turn down Kofi Annan when he came to Damascus. You could dismiss all his proposals with the back of your hand. A ceasefire? Only after every last insurgent has been killed. Humanitarian access? Only after every wounded has been shot in their hospital beds. A political dialogue? You only dialogue with toadies.

You are gambling that if you can give your tank commanders a few more weeks, you can crush your people and send Mr. Annan, the United Nations and everyone packing, including the Russians.

You know that the Americans may blame the Russians and Chinese for their veto but it is a convenient alibi. The Americans don’t want to own Syria: they want it to go away.

Only it won’t go away. A full-blown civil war in Syria draws the Iranians and Russians in on the side of the regime, the Saudis and Gulf states on the side of the Sunnis, and worst case, the conflict spills over into fragile Jordan and unstable Lebanon.

Mr. Assad’s gamble for survival depends on convincing everyone – his middle class, his neighbours and the outside world – that his tyranny is a better guarantee of regional stability than civil war.

There is just one problem. It’s his tyranny that is making the coming civil war inevitable and even more pitiless in its consequences.

If we leave this parallel universe, the only chance of avoiding the worst – a Syrian civil war that spreads violence throughout the Middle East and damages global economic recovery – is for Mr. Annan to persuade Mr. Putin to dump Mr. Assad and then bring the Chinese on side to ratify the deal.

The argument to Mr. Putin goes like this: You want respect? You can’t gain it by backing a tyrant whose rule destabilizes a region. What worked in Grozny doesn’t work here, not in the age of the cellphone camera. Help us create a future Syria that owes as much to you as it does to the Americans. Give the Russians a stake in the future of Syria, free them from being hostage to its tyrannous past and there is a chance Mr. Assad’s parallel universe will come crashing down.

The time to make this happen will evaporate if Mr. Assad’s tank commanders reduce the people to silence. The time to make it happen is now.

Michael Ignatieff teaches international politics at the University of Toronto. On Tuesday evening, he will be in conversation with Robert Fowler as part of this year’s Walter Gordon Symposium addressing the future of multilateral approaches to security, global finance and sustainability.


I think Ignatieff is putting the "blame" where it belongs: on Putin and the Russian oligarchy.
 
PanaEng said:
nothing new but corroborates some previous posts: (shared according to law)

http://news.yahoo.com/russian-anti-terror-troops-arrive-syria-164035966--abc-news.html

The Russians have a stake in Syria and are getting more and more involved with ground troops (advisors!, for now)

Russia does have a stake in Syria, but that begs the question. If Russisa wants assurances its only naval base in the ME will continue to be accessible, then the opposition could have struck a deal for something like that early on.

I still to this point don't know why Russia stood behind Assad regime. It makes no sense. Had the world powers put true and real pressure 6 months ago, this engagement would not have become this bloody.

It is either the Russians/Chinese/US know that Bashar Al-Assad regime will not step down no matter what, so they didn't want to seem like they're enforcing this idea or something else that I can't quite put my finger on it.

Even Hamas recently recognized Syria was not going to be the same, so they moved their mission to Tunisia.

There is no doubt to any military or political observer that Assad regime days are numbered. Syria is suffering very hard economically, politically, ethnically. Six months ago we hardly heard of demonstations in central Damascus or Aleppo. Now it is more common, and further the rebels are staging operation in the area.

The regime for so long had guaranteed its security but neglected to provide its citizens with the same sense of safety/peace. Now, nobody is safe in Syria anymore. The question is not when the regime will fall, but how many will come to lose their lives before this happen.
 
This oped piece from today's Ottawa Citizen notes that the Turkish PM briefly mentioned invoking Article V of the NATO treaty to protect Turkey's border with Syria, which is why I have posted it here. His comment seems to me to be noteworthy, and it seems strange that it has not raised more overt attention than it has. It is reproduced under the Fair Dealing provisions of the Copyright Act.


Turkey could be a problem for NATO

By Eric Morse

April 13, 2012


Late Wednesday afternoon a five-line item came through on a private news service buried among 50 other snippets bearing esoteric titles like “Japan: Bahraini King Meets With PM,” or “Egypt: Muslim Brotherhood To Hold Million-Man March.” And there, nearly lost in the heap, was “Syria: Turkey May Invoke NATO’s Protection — Erdogan.” That one was a head-turner. It was followed by a more detailed report from Reuters.

Apparently, on Wednesday Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan told a plane full of Turkish journalists somewhere over China that Turkey might invoke Article V of the NATO Charter to protect its southern border against Syrian incursions. (Syrian forces have been violating the border regularly in pursuit of refugees from the insurrection, with ground forces and artillery fire).

As it happens, Article V is the “an attack on one is an attack on all” clause that was famously invoked in 2001 to involve NATO countries in the Afghanistan war. In fact, that is the only time Article V has ever been invoked since NATO was founded in 1949. So for Erdogan to have brought it up is not petty or picayune, even if it was said in a flying scrum.

The leader of a NATO member country is talking about invoking a Charter clause that could conceivably involve much of the alliance in operations up to and including combat on Turkey’s southern frontier. That’s important, but few major media ran with it.

The problem is, there was no context. It’s a single story that pops up and then fades because it’s a little arcane, nobody’s feeding it with follow-ups, and it was said at the wrong time and in the wrong place to get Western media attention.

Presumably, if Erdogan was serious about this — and you have to take him at face value until shown otherwise — NATO has not yet received any kind of formal approach. It would take a meeting of the North Atlantic Council, the highest body in NATO, to authorize and shape collective intervention in support of Turkey. And if the idea is still afloat in Ankara, there have to be more than a few NATO-country diplomats working like mad to convince Erdogan that it may not be the best idea in the world.

In fact a formal request from Turkey under Article V would put NATO and its members in a major bind. Turkey is an important member of NATO and a growing force in the Middle East, but it is not what you’d call a typical NATO country, being the only Middle Eastern and Muslim-majority member.

It joined NATO originally because of a mutual interest — containing the Russians — that still exists to this day, but it’s definitely different. It is a vital geopolitical anchor for NATO because of its strength and location. It also has an Islamist-but-pragmatic leader (Erdogan) even though officially it’s a militantly secular state.

NATO can’t afford to treat an Article V request from Turkey in any way that would suggest that its security concerns were less important than anyone other member’s. Added to which, Afghanistan was an “out-of-theatre” exercise in which some had serious doubts. You can’t say that about Turkey, its southern border is also NATO’s.

But NATO desperately does not want to get involved on the Turkish-Syrian border, partly for the same reasons the West does not want to get involved in a direct attack on Syria — a thing that’s almost impossible to do in practice — but also because the southern Turkish border is hideously complex, a potential multi-front war on a single front. In the western segment, there is Syria and all its sectaries, then Iraq and the non-state of Kurdistan straddling the border, and finally Iran itself — and that is a drastic oversimplification.

So NATO has to hope that cooler heads will prevail in Istanbul, and that they don’t get a formal Article V request from the Turks. The intervention in Afghanistan has been a very difficult experience for the alliance, at least as much because of institutional problems like differing rules of engagement within the force as because of the enemy, and it is not one that NATO would choose to repeat any time soon, in or out of theatre.

Eric Morse, a former Canadian diplomat, is vice-chair of security studies at the Royal Canadian Military Institute in Toronto.

© Copyright (c) The Ottawa Citizen


Read more: http://www.ottawacitizen.com/Turkey+could+problem+NATO/6456220/story.html#ixzz1s1BQVamy
 
I wonder if Prime Minister Recep Erdogan isn't trying to separate Turkey from NATO by setting up a strawman that he knows NATO will reject.

The Europeans have, consistently, rejected Turkey's overtures to join Europe and, it seems to me, Turkey has taken the message and has turned East - leaving Europe behind and aiming to become a leader in the 'Near East' and 'Middle East.' Being rejected by NATO would give  Erdogan an opportunity to withdraw from the alliance, further burnishing his reputation with the Arabs and Persians et al.
 
Old Sweat said:
This oped piece from today's Ottawa Citizen notes that the Turkish PM briefly mentioned invoking Article V of the NATO treaty to protect Turkey's border with Syria ....
So far, it appears only the UK Telegraph ....
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/9200822/Syria-Turkey-threatens-to-invoke-Natos-self-defence-article.html
.... have picked up the Turkish PM's statement, and Russian media has taken it a step further suggesting Canada's John Baird said if NATO helps, we will too (but only if Turkey is attacked - as opposed to raided, I guess?) - Rossiyskaya Gazeta article in Russian here, (clunky) Google English version here, and an Armenian media short paraphrase/summary here (caveat:  beware the "passing message from one ear to another" distortion on the third-hand Armenian version):
NATO can help Turkey only if the Syrian forces cross the border with Turkey, Canadian Foreign Minister John Baird said in response to Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan’s statement. Erdogan announced that Turkey can appeal to NATO with the request to apply Article 5 of the NATO charter. According to it, any aggression against each member states is perceived as aggression against the entire alliance. Baird recalled that Canada is a member of NATO and if Syrians want to carry out military action in one of member-states of the alliance, then they will respond, Rossiyskaya Gazeta reports.
 
milnews.ca said:
So far, it appears only the UK Telegraph ....
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/9200822/Syria-Turkey-threatens-to-invoke-Natos-self-defence-article.html
.... have picked up the Turkish PM's statement, and Russian media has taken it a step further suggesting Canada's John Baird said if NATO helps, we will too (but only if Turkey is attacked - as opposed to raided, I guess?) - Rossiyskaya Gazeta article in Russian here, (clunky) Google English version here, and an Armenian media short paraphrase/summary here (caveat:  beware the "passing message from one ear to another" distortion on the third-hand Armenian version):

I'd see it very unlikely Turkey will do anything at the current time. While Erdogan is full of rhetoric, his actions do not match. The FSA had many times indicated their frustration with Turkey's support. Many even suspect Turkish intelligence passing on vital information to Syrian intelligence about FSA activities. Many FSA members suspect Col. Harmoush (one of the earliest defectors) was kidnapped from Turkey and passed on to Syrian intelligence by MIT (Milli İstihbarat Teşkilatı).

The Turkish situation is very fragile. Run by a Sunni sympathizing government, but kept in check by a secular, uncompromising military. For Turkey, going to war with Syria (even if it entailed NATO cover) is a recipe for incresed internal tensions.

I found this article from Reuters true to its core. Very valid observation and possibly a predictable outcome. Many now in both opposition and loyalists are bracing themselves for a long fight:

Source/Copyright to: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/13/us-syria-assad-idUSBRE83C0VY20120413

(Reuters) - Having crushed a popular uprising, he rules by force over an Arab land shattered by conflict and sanctions, his people too exhausted and cowed to resist.

Is this the fate awaiting Syria under Bashar al-Assad?

Saddam Hussein lasted for 12 years after his defeat in the 1991 Gulf War until a U.S.-led invasion unleashed chaos and carnage from which Iraq, for all its oil, has yet to recover.

The trajectories of the two Baathist leaders are far from parallel, but Saddam's prolonged survival is a warning to anyone who believes Assad will fall simply because he has alienated the West and its Arab allies or earned the hatred of countless Syrians, including perhaps most of its Sunni Muslim majority.

Kofi Annan's U.N.-backed ceasefire may temporarily calm a conflict that has already cost more than 9,000 dead, but it is hard to see a compromise emerging between Assad's ruling Alawite elite and those bent on ending its four decades in power.

After so much blood, both sides now see it as a life or death struggle from which they cannot step back, and the United Nations lacks the international consensus to make them.

Time may not be on Assad's side, but while the 46-year-old president hangs on, sectarian rifts he has exploited are likely to widen as Syria descends towards all-out civil war.

In recent weeks, some of Assad's visitors reported him confident he could weather the storm, as his forces unleashed withering bombardments of towns and cities where lightly-armed rebels had possibly unwisely attempted to hold ground.

Military assaults persisted right up to Thursday's dawn ceasefire, which was not preceded by a withdrawal of tanks, troops and big guns as stipulated in Annan's six-point plan.

For now, the Syrian leader remains entrenched, albeit in a battle-scarred landscape and a ruined economy in which his legitimacy and his international repute have been shredded. Parts of restive cities like Homs have been reduced to rubble.

Russia and China still shield Assad from U.N. Security Council action. Iran and its Lebanese Hezbollah ally back him to the hilt, while Lebanon and Shi'ite-led Iraq offer open borders to mitigate the impact of sanctions on their Syrian neighbor.

ECONOMIC HARDSHIP

"The economy is very deeply in the red," said Jihad Yazigi, editor of the economic Syria Report online newsletter.

The only bright spots were a rise in exports to Iraq and a good rainy season, he said, although two of Syria's best farming areas have suffered severe disruption during the unrest.

"Daily life is increasingly harsh," Yazigi said, declining to predict how this might affect prospects for political change.

Sanctions have at best a patchy record, and the crippling U.N. measures against Iraq failed to loosen - and may have reinforced - Saddam's grip on power for more than a decade. Sanctions and hardship could similarly perpetuate Assad's reign.

"If the middle classes emigrate ... then an exhausted population ruled over by a state tightly controlling the supply of food and fuel could look very much like the Saddam model," said Chris Phillips, a Middle East lecturer at Queen Mary, University of London.

Russia and China have twice vetoed draft resolutions on Syria in the U.N. Security Council. Assad has long derided Western sanctions targeting him and his entourage, but which have now been extended to Syria's small but vital oil sector.

Decades of isolation have had little impact on Assad's policies and his Western adversaries, weary of costly foreign wars, have disavowed any military option, even when the bloody siege of Baba Amr in Homs was at its height in February.

Careful not to provoke outside intervention, Assad has kept assaults on cities a notch below the one meted out to Hama in 1982 when his father Hafez al-Assad crushed an armed Islamist revolt by razing neighborhoods and killing many thousands of civilians in a three-week attack that had a lasting deterrent effect.

Despite Saudi and Qatari promises of weapons and money, the assorted army deserters and civilians who took up arms after Assad's relentlessly violent response to initially peaceful protests remain mostly on their own, ill-trained and outgunned.

POWERFUL NEIGHBOUR

The wild card may be Turkey.

Having shifted from amity to hostility as Assad turned his tanks on civilians and rebels alike, the Turks are now incensed by an influx of 25,000 Syrian refugees. After Syrian soldiers fired over the border this week, Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan asserted Turkey's right to ask its NATO partners to defend it.

In 1991, Turkey prodded its Western allies to create a safe haven in Iraq after half a million Kurds fled from Saddam's helicopter gunships. It has floated the same idea for Syria, while signaling any such move would need U.N. or NATO cover.

Turkey almost went to war with Syria in 1998 over its support for Turkish Kurd rebels. Assad's father caved in, expelling Kurdish leader Abdullah Ocalan and opening the way for a surprise rapprochement with Ankara.

Phillips said the spectre of Turkish military intervention was more likely to alarm Assad than any Gulf Arab effort to channel weapons to disparate insurgent groups - something which would fit Syria's portrayal of the unrest as the work of "terrorist" gangs fighting at the behest of foreign enemies.

Extra weaponry for opposition groups might speed Syria's descent into civil war, but would scarcely tip the military balance against Assad. In Libya last year, it was NATO warplanes, not rebel guns, that decided Muammar Gaddafi's fate.

"But if Turkey launched some full-frontal assault using air power on Syrian military bases, Bashar might be concerned about his own military turning on him and saying, 'We're going to be destroyed by this, it's time for you to go'," Phillips said.

So far Assad's Alawite-led military and security forces have remained generally cohesive, despite a flow of desertions to the rebel Free Syrian Army, which has its own internal divisions.

MURKY AID EFFORT

It is unclear how much aid Assad's opponents are getting from Gulf Arab states, despite reports of $100 million pledged at a "Friends of Syria" meeting in Istanbul this month.

"There is nothing of the sort," said one official of the opposition Syrian National Council. The group, he said, had previously been promised $50 million, with $5 million to be paid every two weeks. "But it's not coming regularly," he complained.

The Saudis are eager for the demise of Assad, a close ally of their regional nemesis Iran, but even they may be allowing private Saudi citizens to fund groups in Syria, rather than setting up any government channels, a Western diplomat said.

Such methods, reminiscent of previous Saudi backing for Islamist militants in Afghanistan and elsewhere, might disquiet Western powers concerned lest armed Sunni radicals shoulder aside more moderate and secular elements in the opposition.

Some rebel groups have named themselves after Sunni warriors of old, and are beyond Free Syrian Army control, said Marwa Daoudy, a visiting Middle East scholar at Princeton University.

This was "raising fears that the conflict is evolving into an armed struggle between Sunni-led groups and the Alawite-dominated regime", she said, while stating that minority Druze, Christians and Ismailis were represented in the opposition.

But Assad also has support from some in these groups who prefer the leader they know to an uncertain fate if Syria should fall under hardline Sunni rule, fears shared by some wealthy Sunni merchant families long allied with the governing elite.

From the outset of the revolt, the Syrian leader has played on sectarian fears to shore up his Alawite base.

"Long before the protest movement had turned violent, the authorities sought to convince the Alawite community that it risked slaughter at the hands of an opposition movement depicted simultaneously as a minority of murderous terrorists, a majority of hegemonic Sunni fundamentalists and an alien fifth column working on behalf of a global conspiracy," the International Crisis Group (ICG) said in a report this week.

Tit-for-tat sectarian killings and kidnappings have been on the rise, notably in the scarred city of Homs, and the ICG warned of a "growing disconnect between an insurgency and a popular movement" that were previously intertwined.

PEACE PLAN

Syria's violent dynamics may prove unstoppable, although a glimmer of hope could emerge if the truce holds - and many of Assad's foes say he cannot afford to stop shooting as people will demonstrate in vast numbers if they feel safe to do so.

Annan will have a hard job to achieve what his plan calls "an inclusive Syrian-led political process to address the legitimate aspirations and concerns of the Syrian people", gliding over the opposition demand for Assad's removal.

The Security Council, including Russia and China, has endorsed the plan, which Daoudy described as "one of the last political solutions available to the Assad regime in its interactions with the international community".

"If it fails to seize the opportunity, it might very well alienate its Russian and Chinese allies," she said.

Assad has unilaterally decreed political reforms, including a planned parliamentary election next month that his opponents have dismissed as a cynical ploy given Syria's bloody upheaval.

Syria's U.N. envoy Bashar al-Jaafari told U.S. PBS television's Charlie Rose his country only needed time to meet popular demands but that "collective suicide" was not the way.

"We are saying to our external wing opposition as well as to the people inside, 'Let us reform our country collectively speaking without the bloodshed'," Jaafari said on Thursday.

Asked if this could lead to a change of president, he said this was "up to the people's will" and accused countries such as the United States, France, Turkey, Qatar and Saudi Arabia of meddling in Syria's affairs by backing Assad's domestic enemies.

For those opponents, the idea that the Syrian autocrat would voluntarily cede power in a democratic process seems a sick joke, although a withdrawal of crucial Russian support might conceivably force Assad to rethink his calculations.

There has been no sign of a shift in Russia's position, but Western diplomats say Moscow does expect Assad to step aside although it sees someone from his Alawite circle taking over.

Without some agreed political transition, Syria risks even bloodier turmoil, with incalculable consequences for its 23 million people and for an already unstable Middle East.

"There is the potential for radicalization and sectarianism," said Phillips, "and a major possibility of it turning into a Lebanon- or Iraq-type civil war."
 
Syrian Army possibly running out of fuel:

Source: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/05/08/us-syria-diesel-idUSBRE8470KY20120508

(Reuters) - Syria is facing a halt in imports of diesel needed to power heavy vehicles including army tanks, as a stream of shipments from Russia and other sources has dried up over the past four weeks, industry sources say.

Not one cargo of gasoil, which can be marketed as diesel, has been delivered to Syria's oil ports Banias and Tartous over the past four weeks, according to port data provided by a shipper. Average cargoes contain around 30,000 tonnes of fuel.

As many as nine cargoes of gasoil were delivered in March, with the last two shipments arriving in early April. The bulk of these deliveries came from Russian ports, but gasoil was also delivered from Iran.

Industry sources say no further shipments of refined oil have been seen to reach Syria since the Cape Benat arrived on April 11.

Oil producer Syria has two refineries, but also needs to import large amounts of gasoil and other fuels to meet domestic demand, both for heating and for transport.

The last cargo was delivered by a Monaco-based shipper who said a tightening of EU sanctions in March had forced the firm to cut ties with Syria's distribution company Mahrukat.

Non-EU firms could take over as intermediaries, but so far none appear to have acted on the opportunity to step in.

It is not clear why Iranian shipments have also dried up. An Iranian tanker in late March reached Syria with a cargo of gasoil, and left in April with a cargo of Syrian gasoline, in what appeared to be an exchange of refined oil products between allies.

Venezuela's government confirmed it had sent at least two shipments of fuel to Syria in February, but has not sent any since.

Western sanctions prohibit EU and U.S. firms from buying Syrian oil or doing business with Syrian companies handling imports of crude and refined products.

The EU's move also forced Greek company Naftomar, previously a mainstay of Syrian imports, to halt deliveries of the heating fuel liquefied petroleum gas used in Syrian homes and businesses.

(Reporting by Jessica Donati; editing by Keiron Henderson)
l


 
                                        Shared with provisions of The Copyright Act

Multinational force massed on Jordanian-Syrian border as 55 killed in Damascus bombings
DEBKAfile 10 May
http://www.debka.com/article/21989/

Beset on two fronts, Bashar Assad rushed his elite Presidential Guard Division to Damascus Thursday, May 10, as two massive car bombs in the al Qaza district of Damascus demolished the command center of the Syrian military security service’s reconnaissance division, killing 55 people and injuring more than 300. Over  to the southeast, 12,000 special operations troops from 17 nations, including the US and other NATO members, Saudi Arabia and Qatar, were poised on the Jordanian side of the Syrian border for an exercise codenamed “Eager Lion.”

debkafile’s military sources also disclose that the bomb attack on Damascus was the most serious his regime had suffered against a military target since the 14-month Syrian uprising began. For the first time, Assad moved his most loyal unit, the Republican Guard Brigade, into central Damascus.

Western and Arab pressure is building up to an intolerable pitch for the Syrian president to step down and save his people from the descent into the ultimate agony of a full-blown civil war. It is coming from two directions:

1. Special forces units of the US, France, Britain, Canada and other NATO members have gathered in Jordan alongside Saudi, Jordanian and Qatari special units for a large-scale ten-day military exercise in Jordan starting May 15.

The exercise was set up by the US Special Operations Command Central. It is the Obama administration's message to the Islamic rulers of Iran, Bashar Assad and his Moscow backers, as well as its answer to the complaints from Arab and other Western governments that America is doing nothing to stop the horrors perpetrated in Syria.

Since all 12,000 troops massed in Jordan are commandos, they stand ready at all times to cross the border into Syria if this is deemed necessary.


2.  Syrian cities, especially the capital, are being targeted for violent bombing attacks designed to bring the Assad regime tumbling down. Behind these attacks are Persian Gulf emirates led by Saudi Arabia and Qatar. debkafile’s intelligence sources disclose they have been joined in the last few days for the first time by Turkey which is contributing intelligence input. The military pressure on the Assad regime is thus reinforced by a campaign of terror against its props.

No connection is admitted between the multinational force on the Jordanian-Syrian border and the spate of bombings. However, if Saudi or Qatari intelligence did play a hand in the Damascus bombings, their special forces in Jordan will have been in the picture.
 
Back
Top