- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 10
I wanted to know if your application for any reason is rejected is there an appeal process?? If so please send me in the right direction. Thanks for your time and consideration.
Runner said:Good day everyone, I am posting a link to another TSN Team Canada Sledge Hockey Profile. This one is of Cpl Dominic Larocques teamate Kevin Rempel, this storey includes Kevin's father who also suffered a spinal cord injury. Each one chose a different path and the outcomes were very different.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1TfwIde9Jg
Andrew
Runner said:Dominic Larocques becomes a World Champion again yesterday with Team Canada. Felicitations Dominic!
http://www.hockeycanada.ca/en-ca/Team-Canada/Men/WSHC/2013-WSHC
E.R. Campbell said:According to a report in the Ottawa Citizen the race, per se, is off but the three teams will still go to the South Pole - hopefully by next weekend.
@HRHHenryWindsor said:The wise will admire u. The wishful will envy u. The weak will hate u. This is the reality for those who dare to make a difference!#Invictus
Ok, I don't see the issue there in regard to VAC. It is an injury after release. As for Soldier On it is something I would have asked and required a very clear answer in writing.
Individuals selected to represent Canada in international competitions should be provided with medical coverage.Ok, I don't see the issue there in regard to VAC. It is an injury after release. As for Soldier On it is something I would have asked and required a very clear answer in writing.
I'm a bit more outraged that VAC contributes huge amounts to Soldier On ($16M to host the 2025 games). It's a charity that appears to help only a select few, IMO.
Individuals selected to represent Canada in international competitions should be provided with medical coverage.
If CFMWS can't provide such coverage, perhaps they have outlived their utility.
Soldier On is under the CFMWS umbrella.I agree that they should be provided coverage but that is not a VAC issue. Not sure how CFMWS plays into it or that it is a them thing. I think this issue is more between the members and Soldiers On. As MOE mentioned it is there in the documentation so the members should have been aware of their situation. I still think that Soldiers On should reach out to insurance companies to determine the willingness to provide insurance for the participants. Perhaps a discounted insurance based on sponsorship advertising or maybe SISIP can assist? At the end of day though it is on the members to ensure they have needed coverage.
Ah - didn't get that, years ago there was something in BC that was billed as soldiers on with no affiliation to with anything else so wasn't aware the program was actually under the umbrella. Seemed to be a stand alone thing.Soldier On is under the CFMWS umbrella.
Fully aware and wasn't referring to them as CAF members, they are members of the participating sports team. Insurance is something that does need to be dealt with. Are the Olympic and common-wealth competitors also left high and dry if they are injured?And the affected individuals are not members. If they were CAF members, they would have coverage by the CAF. It is ill and injured released individuals who are being told "You're representing your nation, but you who have complex medical issues, some of which will likely preclude you being able to get medical coverage, for sports which may constitute high risk activities which are not normally insurable, are required to find and pay for your own comprehensive medical insurance."
Ah - didn't get that, years ago there was something in BC that was billed as soldiers on with no affiliation to with anything else so wasn't aware the program was actually under the umbrella. Seemed to be a stand alone thing.
Fully aware and wasn't referring to them as CAF members, they are members of the participating sports team. Insurance is something that does need to be dealt with. Are the Olympic and common-wealth competitors also left high and dry if they are injured?