The purpose of a military is to enhance and enforce foreign policy. It gives the government an option that if they continue the current state of affairs we will no longer have.
"War is nothing but the continuation of state policy by other means" - Karl von Clausewitz, 1833
Future warfare based on globalization will definitely have a urban component too it which light forces simply cannot survive in. Armour is required there. I do agree that the LAV family is an excellent platform and that almost all support and infantry can be supported thru them. However a MBT whether in its current role as the hammer or in a role as a Infantry support vehicle is required.
Armour costs money, and most Canadians think that the forces are unnecessary, as there will be now be no more wars. Who‘d want to attack Canada? How are we to convince the government to pay for something the electorate doesn‘t care about?
Our Leo1‘s ... its mobility as a lighter tank has in the past surprised our allies on manoevres.
Heard a story, possibly apocryphyal, of a Leo "jumping" an M1 which was hidden behind a sand dune, with barrel pointing to the rear. Instant bullseye! May allso be another kind of bull tho...
we are losing both the mobility and armour protection. Interesting idea but when your main support weapon can be taken out by a good shot shooting at tires it seems a little weak.
But the Canadian forces will only ever be deployed in pre-pacified, peacekeeping areas where everyone will see the maple leaf and automatically love us. Why would they shoot at tires?
Tanks...require larger lifters then our current aging fleet of Hercules.
But since we won‘t be getting tanks, it‘s kinda pointless to discuss. We probably won‘t even be getting new Hercules.
This goes to a larger question: What is the future role of our armed forces? Maybe irrelevant...
See where the line broke? I think that is the future of the Canadian Forces. Sad, isn‘t it?
Our biggest waste of money is the fact that we have way too many Wings across the country just to keep employment in some smaller areas that belong to some MP‘s riding. We need maybe 3 Wings, 2 naval Bases, and probably 3 Army Bases. Not including training areas.
Like any other political vote-buying scheme, the bases that are open are determined by political requirements, not by the requirements of national defence. The largest military bases are located in remote areas to defend us against unemployment. The reserve units are in the major centres in case of an invasion.
Construction of military equipment in Canadian factories. Yes this provides jobs but usually ends up doubling the cost of the project as opposed to just buying the equipment elsewhere fine if the government doesn‘t mind using the Military for economic supports but take the difference out of some other budget not ours. If we could buy it somewhere else cheaper then the Government should reimburse us for getting there MP‘s reelected.
From a strictly defensive point of view, it makes sense to have the tools to build your military apparatus in-house. War tends to use up materiel, should it ever come. However, this crap where they buy a 3-rate piece of junk from some Canadian firm, solely because it is Canadian, is stupid. Buy the *plans* for the equipment, built it in the country, and insist on only the best.
Well enough of my rant. Having been in Armour for 7 years, Communications for 2 and now in Intelligence I have seen and heard so many of the problems with our military and it all seems to stem back to a backboneless leadership and a much too involved civilian process in how we do our business. Any General that does have a backbone that makes any statement usually winds up ending his career progression.
Which is why the troops still love Lou MacKenzie, even to this day. But he is no longer a General, except in name.