- Reaction score
- 27,743
- Points
- 1,090
CFAO 55-28Which one’s that?
CFAO 55-28Which one’s that?
I don’t have DWAN. I specifically meant the chemical.CFAO 55-28
Not having the CFAO in front of me... I'll have to check tomorrow.I don’t have DWAN. I specifically meant the chemical.
Ah, the good 'ole days of Sea Training berating you cause you didn't know about regulations that haven't existed since you were born.On the flip side the RCN canceled all the MARCORDs however many years ago, and some are still in use because they haven't actually replaced them with a NAVORD.
Wasn't it some kind of cleaning chemical for inside of airplanes??Not having the CFAO in front of me... I'll have to check tomorrow.
Probably.Just curious if it’s the permethrin we all dipped our stuff in.
Ah, DDT’s methylated brother….nice.
Not sure if you still can, but it wasn’t long ago you could buy clothes treated with permethrin at Mark’s.
Not sure if you still can, but it wasn’t long ago you could buy clothes treated with permethrin at Mark’s.
I think permethrin was for mosquitoes, but I’d imagine they work on ticks as well.Is that the anti tick pants ?
I enjoy how many chemicals that are brought in to replace other chemicals turn out to just be different kinds of bad, and in some cases demonstrably worse.
I think permethrin was for mosquitoes, but I’d imagine they work on ticks as well.
Not really; we’re back to keeping unwanted creatures out of your pants.Boy, this thread has drifted….
Not really; we’re back to keeping unwanted creatures out of your pants.
Not really; we’re back to keeping unwanted creatures out of your pants.