Eye In The Sky said:Fuck, not only am I a UFI Nazi, I miss REALLY obvious humour and ribbings.
Damn you -- it takes away some of my "mocking RCAF / been-there Airborne Regt" credibility, acknowledging several sets of boyscout badges.Good2Golf said:Darn, EITS, I was trying to get a rise from Journeyman...at least I did for a moment. ;D Oh well, I guess the feathers on JM's wings and mine are just as big and "aircrewy." :nod:
Journeyman said:No, that's not true; the new blonde at Don Cherry's is "Britany" :nod:
Quite sure. :nod:Good2Golf said:Sure it's not with two 't's? :-\
Shadybrah23 said:Howdy folks,
I'm looking for a solid up-to-date answer as to what the requirements are for SAR Tech application (time in, specifically).
I've heard 4 years w/ Cpl; 5 years w/ Cpl; and even 36 months for combat arms was mentioned a few pages back here.
For the record I've searched these forums as well as google, all varying results
Campbell95 said:Would joining as an ACSO, serving 4 years and then re-mustering as a SAR tech be a reasonable path or would it be better to join as a medic or combat engineer > combat diver and then go for SAR tech?
Thanks for the feedback!
Campbell95 said:Is there any truth to this?