PuckChaser said:
HESCO is cheaper (at least I think it is), folds well, and only sucks to fill when you have to do it by hand. Otherwise, let the Badger do it in 10 seconds flat!
HESCO doesn't weigh 1 lb when it's empty, but sure can weigh 35 lb when full.
As well, standard sand bags are versatile, they can be filled with anything; sand, snow, rocks/pebbles, and brass casings... or just about anything else you want to carry or build with... They can even be used as effective covers for just about anything.
421 EME said:
I can't see a military use for this item.
1. Not every place on this planet has large amounts of fresh water to fill these things, but there will always be sand or dirt to fill sandbags.
2. Sandbags can be filled much faster than these things can.
3. How do these things hold up to bullet strikes compared to sandbags?
Yet more relevant arguments. You can find dirt and sand just about anywhere... and when you can't get down to dirt and sand, you can always use snow.
I agree with 421 EME; these Stormbags have no practical use in the military; they're not cost effective and they're not efficient based on weight and requirements.
The only practical application I could envision for these is for floods... but, for the cost of 1 of these Stormbags, you could probably buy at least 20+ HESCO sand bags.
And I somehow don't see individual soldiers buying Stormbags; too expensive, too heavy, and as PuckChaser put it;
PuckChaser said:
I'd rather use the water to drink, and just use the dirt I find on the ground.
And again; why is this thread titled: Gear... why not title it Stormbag? I will argue again that this is hardly "gear".