- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 360
the 48th regulator said:You cannot call our system, distinctly Canadian, it is not.
It is Canadian for the fact the awards are issued to mainly Canadians, that is where the distinction stops. When we still await HM Queen Elizabeth II, The Queen of Canada to approve the medals, there is nothing distinct, other than we are still part of Britannia.
Until the whole system is overhauled, we keep our heritage, revamp the decision making process, and rid our the alignment with British Medals (i.e. the V.C) we cannot pontificate the fact of our apparent Canadian individuality on the Global scheme of awards systems.
We can beat our chest and call ourselves Canadian, while blessing our Queens long life, but in the end, our system is NOT "Canadian".
If by Canadian you mean it has to have been invented from the ground up in Canada, with no external influence of any kind, then we will probably never see such a system. But it is possible to have a distinctly Canadian system that still reflects our heritage, wherever that may come from. I would argue that we have that now. The vast majority of our honours and awards were designed here; all of the decisions regarding them -- name, criteria for award, design, materials, everything -- are made by Canadian officials.
I'd argue that a historically pure Canadian system along the lines that you seem to be suggesting, with no external influence whatsoever, wouldn't even include circular medals hanging from one's chest by bits of ribbon -- after all, those weren't invented here.