Agreed. I think it's extremely...stupid. Judge someone on when they were immature and didn't know what they wanted in life.Kratos said:Applied for Navy Log. Got rejected.
The recruiter said everything was great except for my marks:
"Your average was only a 77 and, therefore, not that competitive."
"I graduated with an 84 average."
"It says he your average was a 77."
"...I graduated with an 84, but I can go upstairs and check my transcript."
*Runs upstairs, grabs calculator and transcript.*
"Yeah, I had an 84."
"Hold on here."
*Checks file/stuff*
*Oh, they take the average of all your grade 10, 11 and 12 marks.*
"You're kidding me?"
"Unfortunately, no."
Why would they do that? I find that absolutely ridiculous.
Do the Canadian Forces know I switched back from public to private school for grade ten, leaving me in the dust with regards to math and chemistry? Marks in the fifties make for great averages...
Clearly, the selection board must have seen that every course I took in high school exceeded the Provincial honours level. They must also have seen that every course I took in grades eleven and twelve, along with two in grade ten, again exceeded this aforementioned level.
They must have seen that not only did I graduate with my provincial diploma, but also an International Baccalaureate diploma.
Do they not care/realise/choose to omit that a person can show great improvement over three years?
Anyways, yeah, I was pretty mad just for those reasons, but overall, I'm not that upset I got rejected. When I really started thinking about the fact I was going to have to take a four year degree in something I wasn't truly interested in, subsidised or not, my feelings shifted a bit.
"Oh hey, you've shown incredible improvement in the last few years. Oh hey, you're getting As in every course and you're an engineering major...but it says here you got a C- in math in grade 11. Sorry, refused."