Flawed Design said:
...
The manning process is weird.
...
Yes it is. And it always was. If it makes you feel any better - it is not only Reservists this happens to. Although I will say that the potential impact on a Reservist is certainly more severe (the Reg guy still has a job, after all).
I used to call it the "TO &E" Tango.
There are many reasons for it - tactical situation in the mission area changes. Incoming CO has different ideas regarding manning than existing CO. Government changes the mission at the last minute. Some ALLIED government changes THEIR mission at the last minute. Ad nauseum.
BUT - (this is based on much experience both manning and deploying on various missions) - much (perhaps most) of the problems regarding manning boil down quite simply to poor communications. Poor communication from NDHQ to Area (and back), poor communication from Area to Bde (and back), poor communication Bde to tasked unit (and back). And it has been so since at LEAST 1984, when I first became involved (at least peripherally, and in an extremely minor role) in manning a SNOWGOOSE Roto.
I don't know why that is - I know for a FACT that all those HQs are manned (for the most part) by good, intelligent, hardworking, dedicated service men who have only the best intentions, and GENUINELY are trying to keep the confusion out of it, and make it easy on the deploying troops - but it never works.
It seems to be a military thing (not just CF) - and goes back many, many, many years - I'm sure there's an amateur (or professional) military historian on here who can quote a Roman or Greek commander lamenting the same thing.
I dunno' what the answer is - and it would appear neither do folks many pay grades above mine.
Roy