• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Pocket-sized 'hummingbird' drone aims to flutter into enemy territory

57Chevy

Army.ca Veteran
Subscriber
Inactive
Reaction score
1
Points
410
Pocket-sized 'hummingbird' drone aims to flutter into enemy territory

LOS ANGELES — A pocket-size drone dubbed the Nano Hummingbird for the way it flaps its tiny robotic wings has been developed for the Pentagon by a Monrovia, Calif., company as a mini-spy plane capable of maneuvering on the battlefield and in urban areas.

The battery-powered drone was built by AeroVironment Inc. for the Pentagon's research arm as part of a series of experiments in nanotechnology. The little flying machine is built to look like a bird for potential use in spy missions.

The Hummingbird is the result of a five-year effort, announced Thursday by the company and the Pentagon's Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.

Equipped with a camera, the drone can fly at speeds of up to 11 miles per hour, AeroVironment said. It can hover and fly sideways, backward and forward, as well as go clockwise and counterclockwise, by remote control for about eight minutes.

The quick flight meets the goals set forth by the government to build a flying "hummingbird-like" aircraft. It also demonstrates the promise of fielding mini-spy planes. Industry insiders see the technology eventually being capable of flying through open windows or sitting on power lines, capturing audio and video while enemies would be none the wiser.

The Hummingbird would be a major departure from existing drones that closely resemble traditional aircraft. The next step is likely to be further refinement of the technology, officials said, before decisions are made about whether the drones would be mass-produced and deployed.

"The miniaturization of drones is where it really gets interesting," said defense expert Peter W. Singer, author of "Wired for War," a book about robotic warfare. "You can use these things anywhere, put them anyplace, and the target will never even know they're being watched."

With a wingspan of 6.5 inches, the mini-drone weighs 19 grams, or less than a AA battery. The Hummingbird's guts are made up of motors, communications systems and a video camera. It is slightly larger than the average hummingbird.

The success of the program "paves the way for a new generation of aircraft with the agility and appearance of small birds," Todd Hylton, Hummingbird program manager for the Pentagon's research arm, said in a statement.

In all, the Pentagon has awarded about $4 million to AeroVironment since 2006 to develop the technology and the drone itself.

Matt Keennon, the company's manager on the project, said it was a technical challenge to create the mini-machine from scratch because it pushes the limitations of aerodynamics.

Less than two years ago, an earlier version of the drone could fly for 20 seconds. Keennon said the current eight minutes of flight are likely to be extended as experiments continue.

"This is a new form of man-made flight," Keennon said. It is about "biomimicry," or building a machine that is inspired by nature, he said.

The Pentagon issued seven specific milestones for the Hummingbird, including the ability to hover in a 5-mph wind gust and the ability to fly from outdoors to indoors and back outdoors through a normal-size doorway.

Critics have noted that privacy issues may emerge depending on how the drones are used.

For now, the Hummingbird is just a prototype, Keennon said. But 10 years from now, he sees the technology carrying out detailed reconnaissance missions.

But it's not likely to be a "hummingbird," considering that that's a rare bird in, say, New York City.

"I'm not a bird expert, but a sparrow seems to be better," Keennon said.

                              (Reproduced under the Fair Dealings provisions of the Copyright Act)



 
Saw the video today. That thing looks cool. Don't know who will buy it seeing as how the area it is used must have an indigenous hummingbird population to be effective. I suppose that it could be applied to a different airframe for night ops. Cool idea for sure.
 
willellis said:
Don't know who will buy it seeing as how the area it is used must have an indigenous hummingbird population to be effective.

I think you need to read more. The article clearly states that this a prototype and nothing more. The significance here is the technology not the fact that this technology resembles a hummingbird.

Go back and re-read the last 3 lines of the posted article.
 
Amazing what a start. It even looks like a humming bird, and the way it landed and closed its wings is convincing.

But and Yes there's a but, won't it give away its presence by doing things like flying into windows and doorways, and what will it do about screen doors and sliding patio doors.

Will it be able to conserve battery life by flying into a closed window and acting like a stunned bird.

There's a lot of possibilities in the technology.
 
I am aware of the fact that this is a prototype. I think you need not limit yourself to what is on this forum as this is not the only publication on the matter. The video of the interview from the BBC with the creator of this ROV went on to show that it has a camera built into the body of the hummingbird for " missions". 

By the way, the last 3 lines of the article are ridiculous. A sparrow that flies like a hummingbird. The flight profile of this ROV demands that if it is to be disguised as a bird, it MUST be a hummingbird since the flight of one is unique.  Who cares about this thing being applicable to New York, or any other state for that matter.

All I was saying is that this is a cool piece of kit. Maybe you should read the last line of post where I agreed that it could be altered for more military friendly usage.  ::)
 
Here's the same video from YouTube:
NANO Hummingbird Drone
a bit easier to see  ;D
                              (Reproduced under the Fair Dealings provisions of the Copyright Act)

 
Good video of it in flight. There is one that had the creator holding it in his hand as well. I will post the link soon.
 
Military drone/spy type nanotechnology is not a new thing either.
Check out this article accusing the US for making flying insects from (The Telegraph) dated Oct 2007:
US accused of making insect spy robots
                            (Reproduced under the Fair Dealings provisions of the Copyright Act)

 
ya, that is something else eh? I think that there should be particular interest in insects/birds that are capable of hovering, for obvious reasons. So many applications.
 
Did anyone catch the "Remote Control War Series" on TV
It examines the increase of robotics in the military and how it
affects the nature of war.

REMOTE CONTROL WAR

It’s not often that a documentary delivers chill-a-minute horror, but “Remote Control War” seems to get creepier every time you come back from a commercial. The hour long documentary, Thurs, Feb. 24, on CBUT’s “Doc Zone” – began with a humble household device.......
continues at link.
                        (Reproduced under the Fair Dealings provisions of the Copyright Act)
 
I'm sure nano robotics is included in this....

Build It, And They Will Spend
February 24, 2011
Article Link

Robotic aircraft, ground vehicles and ships are taking a rapidly growing share of the arms market. UAV (unmanned aerial vehicles) are already more than ten percent of combat aircraft sales, and by the end of the decade that will more than double to over 20 percent of sales. Depending on how rapidly flight software and control systems of combat UAVs mature (and become more reliable), that percentage will grow even faster. Most combat aircraft designers and manufacturers have agreed that what they are currently working on is the last generation of manned combat aircraft. The future belongs to UAVs.

Meanwhile, it's uncertain if UUVs and USVs (unmanned subs and surface ships) will ever really take off. Optimists see these vessels gaining sales of at least several billions of dollars a year by the end of the decade. But, while the technology is there, and working models are in use, UUVs and USVs have not yet attracted heavy sales.

Ground based UGVs are also successful, but not taking a big bite out of defense budgets. UGVs racked up about $400 million in sales last year, versus about $6 billion for UAVs. By the end of the decade, that should increased by 4-5 times. But much depends on acceptance of armed UGVs. Israel is using some for border patrol, but no one else is. The U.S. has bought thousands of smaller, and unarmed UGVs for bomb disposal and some infantry and security tasks. There are plans for larger combat vehicles, and if these ever show up in a useful form, than there will be bigger sales numbers. Another breakout market is for unmanned support vehicles (trucks). If the reliable tech shows up, the sales will follow.
More on link
 
Dan Brown scooped all you guys on this in "Deception Point" back in 2001. In his book Rogue SF use a Nano-insect drone to spy on scientists in the arctic circle.  ;D
 
Back
Top