Pusser said:
:facepalm: to be fair, I don't know if I know anymore. We've flopped around so much on this, I've lost track. We used to screw everybody. Now we select a few chosen individuals and screw them really badly...
Well, see this is why I think we need to have two separate references, one for "Duty Travel" and one for "Temporary Duty". Tee term "duty travel" isn't even defined. Duty travel and the CFTDIs should cover only the portion of travel between two duty locations, that's it. IAW chapter 7, for example, to earn benefits under this seciton, you need to be
(a) on TD or on an attached posting;
(b)
travelling between their place of duty and another duty location, both of which are in Canada or the Continental United States of America (CANUS); and
(c) authorized to occupy accommodations overnight.
It's that yellow bit that I don't understand. When we go on TD, we get incidentals for the entire time we are there, but we aren't "travelling" between two places of duty. So why do we get incidentals the whole time?
So, based on that, the entitlements at para 7.02 (Accommodations) and 7.18 (Meals) wouldn't apply because the member is not longer travelling between two places of duty.
Now, whenever I've seen someone get attached-posted, I've always seen R&Q covered, whether it was to a training school in another part of the country, our a short term CFTPO to the other coast. However, I suppose, that in accordance with the regulations, you could get attach-posted from Halifax to Esquimalt and you would be on your own to deal with R&Q.