Which is what this thread is actually about!I believe that's called a mutiny.
Which is what this thread is actually about!I believe that's called a mutiny.
Which is what this thread is actually about!
Have we gone so far off the tracks that we've come back on the tracks ?
To be fair air worthiness is much easier, as there is a much larger user base and support for doing it for specific airframes, with OEMs etc all involved. Big fan of the airworthiness program, but they do have a massive support infrastructure/culture behind it.That’s a serious leadership failure.
To not have a seaworthiness program (or whatever the correct term is), is one thing.
To HAVE a seaworthiness program, and disregard it is an entirely different issue.
Folks can dis the airworthiness (operational, technical, investigative) program(s), but it’s borne of blood, and to its credit, the RCAF takes few things, if anything, more seriously.
Pretty sure we’ve now proven that if a thread derails for long enough it will somehow get back to its original subject.
Have we gone so far off the tracks that we've come back on the tracks ?
To be fair air worthiness is much easier, as there is a much larger user base and support for doing it for specific airframes, with OEMs etc all involved. Big fan of the airworthiness program, but they do have a massive support infrastructure/culture behind it.
Yup! This one gets me…have/had personal interest in things FRE at the time, and that fact that it’s one of the ones in better condition is appalling. FRE, PRO, etc…I think people refusing to sail would be a better way for things to come to a head than a literal disaster, as the Navy didn't even acknowledge that FRE was a best case scenario for that fire and most other ships wouldn't have been able to do the same response because of equipment issues and lack of people onboard.
Well that it is part of the RCN tradition and did lead to some changes.Seriously time for a crew to do a work stoppage......standing on the dock while the ship should be leaving port.
Boiling Frog…8 years ago, copies of the Mainguy report were appearing in messes on a certain RCN ship. I found one in the C&PO's...turns out there were more left on photocopiers and in other various spots. They never did find who was doing it.
The parallels from the time of the report to current times were...shocking.
Death of a thousand cuts though...a slice at a time is barely noticeable.
It helps when there’s money to be made. For instance, we need to pay Lockmart a large sum if $ to figure out how much it’s going to cost to decide on the airworthiness of the proposed Walmart kettle. It’s going to take a lot of kettles to hit a break even point on that project.To be fair air worthiness is much easier, as there is a much larger user base and support for doing it for specific airframes, with OEMs etc all involved. Big fan of the airworthiness program, but they do have a massive support infrastructure/culture behind it.
Just use the RCAF's catering budget and go the route of the USAF:
Lawmaker Chides Air Force for Buying Expensive Coffee Cups
Lawmaker Chides Air Force for Buying Expensive Coffee Cups
I read some of that report and the RCN appeared to copy the RN - only worse.8 years ago, copies of the Mainguy report were appearing in messes on a certain RCN ship. I found one in the C&PO's...turns out there were more left on photocopiers and in other various spots. They never did find who was doing it.
The parallels from the time of the report to current times were...shocking.
Death of a thousand cuts though...a slice at a time is barely noticeable.
8 years ago, copies of the Mainguy report were appearing in messes on a certain RCN ship. I found one in the C&PO's...turns out there were more left on photocopiers and in other various spots. They never did find who was doing it.
The parallels from the time of the report to current times were...shocking.
Death of a thousand cuts though...a slice at a time is barely noticeable.