• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

North Korea (Superthread)

Every now and again, you need to do something wholly raw, wholly indefensible, as a clear and stern warning that certain things are NOT to be considered.  Had the US simply nuked the North Korean capital when they starting rattling sabres about how kewl their nuclear program was, we wouldn't even be having these discussions.  Plus, any capability for command and control would have been wiped out.  We don't negotiate with terrorists, even if they do have their own flags.

I think it would be a horrible, horrible thing to do, or to have to do, but they have made clear that other military options simply won't be enough.  Fine.  You've set the game up at the big boys table...this is how hard the big boys hit.  Still wanna play? 

I have to wonder how many of the starved dead in the streets of that country would really care anyway....but what other clear, decisive action would make it crystal clear not only to Korea, but to others, that you don't hold the Western world, i.e., the civilized part of the planet, to ransom. 

Have I mentioned how horrible it would be?  But what other options are there to send a clear and urgent message, and to deter further attempts of that nature?
 
Anybody have a concise, no BS assesment of the NK military, beyond the nukes?  I've heard the big numbers, but then Iraq had even bigger numbers and look at what they couldn't do.  Twice. 
Just curious how Korean War-Act II would trick out if it stuck to conventional means. 
 
Janes.com

PM me and i'll give you the DND password to access the subscriber files
 
A Burma WMD connection?

"'Burma's generals admire the North Koreans for standing up to the United States and wish they could do the same.' After an exchange of secret visits, North Korean armaments began to arrive in Burma... North Korean-made field artillery pieces... truck-mounted, multiple rocket launchers and possibly also surface-to-air missiles for its Chinese-supplied naval vessels... then came the tunneling experts. Most of Pyongyang's own defense industries, including its chemical and biological-weapons programs, and many other military as well as government installations are underground." /1,2

"Myanmar's military government also has purchased on the open market technologies that are potentially usable in a nuclear program... In 2004, Myanmar's military junta was in negotiations to buy Scud missile parts from Pyongyang, but the Bush administration convinced Myanmar to back off." /3


---------------------
/1 "Tunnels, Guns and Kimchi: North Korea’s Quest for Dollars – Part I". Bertil Lintner. Yale Global. Center for the Study of Globalization. Yale University. June 9 2009 <http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/display.article?id=12442>

/2 "N. Korea Digs Tunnels for Myanmar's Secretive Regime". Bertil Lintner. Asia Sentinel. The Korea Times. June 14 2009. <http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/opinon/2009/06/137_46782.html>

/3  "U.S. Keeps Close Eye On North Korean Ship". J. Solomon and Y. Dreazen. The Wall Street Journal. June 23 2009. <http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124571192210838865.html?mod=googlenews_wsj>
 
Is there a possibility of North-Korea developing enough nukes in the near future for MAD to apply in terms of their production capability?
 
Another sign of solidarity against North Korea.

Agence France-Presse - 6/28/2009 2:05 PM GMT
Japan, S.Korea in united stance against N.Korea
South Korea and Japan "will never tolerate" a nuclear-armed North Korea, South Korean President Lee Myung-Bak said on Sunday after talks with Japanese Prime Minister Taro Aso.

Lee and Aso agreed to press North Korea to abandon its nuclear programme amid Pyongyang's continued sabre-rattling, and called for China to play a greater role in persuading its ally to disarm, they said in a news conference.


"During the talks, we confirmed that we will never tolerate a nuclear-armed North Korea," Lee told reporters.

"Through implementing UN resolution 1874, we need to show North Korea that they will gain nothing by obtaining nuclear weapons," Lee said, referring to UN sanctions against Pyongyang for its recent nuclear and missile tests.

Aso said: "We agreed to strengthen cooperation between Japan, South Korea and the United States, and agreed on the need to deepen cooperation with China."

China, North Korea's main ally, has always favoured cautious diplomacy toward Pyongyang, wary of any moves that could push the isolated regime to collapse and potentially send millions of refugees streaming over its border.

The summit came as Pyongyang has stepped up its confrontational rhetoric amid global suspicions that Kim Jong-Il's administration is preparing to fire more missiles and stage a military exercise off the North's east coast.

Regional tension spiked after North Korea on May 25 carried out its second nuclear test, followed by missile launches.

North Korea has also abandoned six-party talks on its nuclear disarmament, which involved the two Koreas, the United States, China, Russia and Japan.

Lee and Aso discussed the idea of holding five-party talks excluding Pyongyang, "with an aim of making progress in the six-party talks," Aso said.

Tokyo and Seoul have led the push in East Asia against the North's increasingly antagonistic stance, in which Pyongyang has repeatedly warned of a military confrontation.


North Korea has vowed to build more nuclear bombs and to start a new weapons programme based on uranium enrichment in response to the UN sanctions.

The North Sunday renewed its verbal offensive, threatening to bolster its nuclear deterrence against the United States, a close ally of South Korea and Japan.

"We will strengthen our nuclear deterrence further for our self-defence to cope with outright US nuclear threats and nuclear war attempts," Pyongyang's ruling communist party newspaper Rodong Sinmun said.

Rodong said the North's nuclear drive could be justified by the "US introduction of nuclear weapons into South Korea," despite the denial by Seoul and Washington that there are US nuclear weapons on South Korean soil.

Lee's one-day trip to Tokyo was part of regular "shuttle summit diplomacy," a system that sees the leaders visit each other twice a year for talks on issues including diplomatic and economic matters.

Lee and Aso also agreed to hold a senior-official level meeting on July 1 to resume stalled negotiations on a bilateral free trade deal.

"The bilateral free trade agreement should be completed," Lee said, adding that "South Korea will fight protectionism" amid a global recession.

The South Korean president also said that he had asked Aso "to give Korean residents in Japan the right to vote in local assembly elections."

The majority of Korean residents in Japan are descendants of forced labourers brought to Japan during during its colonial rule of the Korean Peninsula in the first half of the 20th century.
 
The incongruous said:
Is there a possibility of North-Korea developing enough nukes in the near future for MAD to apply in terms of their production capability?

I was reading that NK is switching to Uranium from Plutonium. Experts believe that NK could refine around 4 tons of enriched Uranium. Bombs made from Uranium are easier to make and more likely to work than Plutonium. Perhaps the last test reinforced that point. Also their stock of Plutonium is quite small.
 
Good.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090630/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/us_us_nkorea_ship

Source: North Korean ship now going the other way


By PAULINE JELINEK, Associated Press Writer Pauline Jelinek, Associated Press Writer – 30 mins ago
WASHINGTON – A U.S. official says a North Korean ship has turned around and is headed back the way it came, after being tracked for days by American vessels on suspicion it was carrying illicit weapons.

The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss intelligence, says it is unclear whether the Kang Nam is going back to its home port in North Korea or diverting elsewhere.

The ship left a North Korean port on June 17 and is the first vessel monitored under U.N. sanctions that ban the regime from selling arms and nuclear-related material.

It was suspected the Kang Nam was going to Myanmar. But the U.S. official says that after a week-and-a half at sea, it turned around on Sunday or Monday. It was off the coast of Vietnam on Tuesday.
 
I read somewhere that DPRK officials claimed the Kang Nam was carrying a cargo of rice.  Pretty funny story for a country that has had a difficult time feeding itself to be exporting rice!  BBC did report today, however, that their economy seemed to show some growth and better than normal agricultural yields were partly responsible.
 
Yet another threat, this time aimed at Japan.

NKorea threatens to shoot down Japanese spy planes

By KWANG-TAE KIM
The Associated Press
Saturday, June 27, 2009; 9:00 AM

SEOUL, South Korea -- North Korea threatened Saturday to shoot down any Japanese planes that enter its airspace, accusing Tokyo of spying near one of its missile launch sites.

The North has designated a no-sail zone off its eastern coast from June 25 to July 10 for military drills, raising concerns that it might test-fire short- or mid-range missiles in the coming days, in violation of a U.N. resolution.

North Korea's air force said Japan's E-767 surveillance aircraft conducted aerial espionage near the Musudan-ri missile site on its northeast coast Wednesday and Thursday.

The military "will not tolerate even a bit the aerial espionage by the warmongers of the Japanese aggression forces but mercilessly shoot down any plane intruding into the territorial air of the (North) even 0.001 mm," the air force said in a statement carried by the country's official Korean Central News Agency.
ad_icon

An official from Japan's Defense Ministry said the country's planes regularly gather information on North Korea but declined to comment on the types of planes used or the locations monitored. He spoke on condition of anonymity, citing government policy.

The threat against alleged Japanese aerial espionage is rare, though the North has regularly complained of U.S. spy missions in its airspace.

Japan is very sensitive to North Korea's missile programs, as its islands lie within easy range. In 1998, a North Korean missile flew over Japan's main island. Tokyo has since spent billions of dollars on developing a missile shield with the United States and has launched a series of spy satellites primarily to watch developments in North Korea.

But in April, another rocket flew over Japan's main island, drawing a strong protest from Tokyo. Pyongyang claims it put a satellite into orbit, while the U.S. and its allies say it was really a test of the country's long-range missile technology.

The launch was one of a series of missile tests in recent months, and the communist regime further raised tensions by conducting a second underground nuclear test in May. Its actions have drawn harsh international condemnation and new U.N. sanctions.

Also Saturday, North Korea accused South Korea of planning to participate in U.S.-led cyber warfare exercises, calling it an "intolerable provocation."


North Korea "is fully ready for any form of high-tech war," said the Committee for the Peaceful Reunification of Korea, which handles relations with South Korea, according to KCNA.

The U.S. leads "Cyber Storm" exercises to test its defenses against computer hackers and invites officials from other countries to participate, but a South Korean Defense Ministry official said he had no information on the exercises. Calls to South Korea's spy agency seeking comment went unanswered on Saturday.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/27/AR2009062700480.html
 
North Korea test-fires two short-range missiles
Updated Thu. Jul. 2 2009 6:56 AM ET

The Associated Press

SEOUL, South Korea -- North Korea test-fired two short-range missiles Thursday, South Korea's Defence Ministry said, a move that aggravates the already high tensions following Pyongyang's recent nuclear test and UN sanctions imposed as punishment.

The missiles were fired from the eastern coastal city of Wonsan on Thursday afternoon, a ministry official said on condition of anonymity citing department policy. He did not say what types of missiles were launched, but Yonhap news agency said they were ground-to-ship missiles.

North Korea had earlier issued a no-sail zone in waters off its east coast through July 10 for military drills. That designation has been viewed as a prelude to such missile tests.


Full story here
 
Curious to see how far this conflict is going to go. How long will the IC wait until NK reaches a certain threshold of nuclear (offensive) capability? Or will the IC continue to "condemn", "denounce" and otherwise amuse Dear Leader for the next 4-5 years until he has in fact armed his mil forces with nuke-tipped missiles, and becomes a credible threat (with intent AND capability)?

Or is the IC so confident that five years is too short of a time period for NK to reach this status, or that this is all a ruse to secure internal stability within NK during the "grooming" and transition period for the "Brilliant Comrade?"
 
Seems the number of missiles they fired is now 4, not just two as earlier said.


Agence France-Presse - 7/2/2009 5:54 PM GMT
NKorea fires four short-range missiles amid nuclear standoff

North Korea on Thursday test-fired four short-range missiles, South Korean military officials said, further fuelling tension sparked by its nuclear standoff with the international community.

The missiles -- apparently surface-to-ship ones -- were fired into the East Sea (Sea of Japan) between 5:20 pm (0820 GMT) and 9:20 pm, defence ministry officials were quoted as saying by Yonhap news agency.

All were launched from a base at Sinsang-ri, near the eastern coastal city of Wonsan, a spokesman was quoted as saying.

Other officials told the agency on condition of anonymity they landed about 100 kilometres (60 miles) off the coast, where the North has imposed a maritime ban until July 11 for what it calls a military drill.

Spokesmen from the defence ministry confirmed the first three firings to AFP but could not be reached for comment on the fourth.

It was the first military action the hardline communist state had taken since the United Nations on June 12 imposed tougher sanctions for its May 25 nuclear test.

South Korea's JoongAng Ilbo newspaper, quoting an intelligence source, said the North was likely to fire a series of short-range missiles in the coming days.

Apart from ground-to-ship weapons, it said these would likely include Scud-B missiles with a range of 340 kilometres (210 miles).

The North may also fire Rodongs, whose 1,300-kilometre range would likely be shortened to some 400 kilometre for the current round of testing, the paper predicted.

In the days after its atomic test -- the second since 2006 -- Pyongyang fired a total of six short-range missiles and renounced the truce brokered on the Korean peninsula after a civil war in 1950 to 1953.

In response to the UN resolution tightening curbs on its missile and atomic activities, it vowed to build more nuclear bombs.

US and South Korean officials believe ailing leader Kim Jong-Il, 67, is staging a show of strength to bolster his authority as he tries to put in place a succession plan involving his youngest son.

Japan's Prime Minister Taro Aso condemned Thursday's launches, telling reporters: "We have repeatedly warned that such a provocative act is not beneficial for North Korea's national interest."

The commander of US Northern Command, General Victor Renuart, told The Washington Times he did not think Pyongyang's missiles posed any real threat to the US.

"The nation has a very, very credible ballistic-missile defense capability," the paper quoted him as saying

"Our ground-based interceptors in Alaska and California ... give me a capability that if we really are threatened by a long-range ICBM (intercontinental ballistic missile) that I've got high confidence that I could interdict that flight before it caused huge damage to any US territory."

In Beijing, a US delegation Thursday met officials for talks on giving the UN sanctions more teeth.

The support of China, the North's sole major ally and largest trade partner, is seen as crucial in making the sanctions stick.

The delegation, led by Philip Goldberg -- the State Department's point man on coordinating implementation of the sanctions -- met officials from the foreign ministry.

His team includes members of the National Security Council and the departments of Treasury and Defence.

Goldberg declined comment on China's position.

"The US position is that we want all the various aspects of the resolutions to work," he told reporters. "It is our intention to fully implement the resolutions."

US warships have since mid-June been tracking a North Korean ship suspected of carrying weapons. The Kang Nam 1 was reportedly headed for Myanmar but US officials said Tuesday it has now turned back.

China said its top envoy on the North Korean nuclear issue, Wu Dawei, had begun a visit to Russia, the United States, Japan and South Korea.

They are members of a forum which has tried since 2003 to persuade the North to scrap its nuclear programmes in return for energy aid and diplomatic and security benefits.

The North announced it was quitting the talks after the UN censured its long-range rocket launch on April 5.

North and South Korea meanwhile held more talks about the fate of their last major joint business project, the Seoul-funded Kaesong industrial estate just north of the border.

But they failed to narrow differences or set the date for their next meeting, Seoul officials said.

 
 
Wonder when they are going to say that one was a scud missle.  I think that UN really needs to stand up at the table and really question why they are testing so much.  Really wondering why the first reports out were saying two and now it is 4.  Something fishy there
 
And the saber-rattling continues with more missiles fired.

NORTH Korea has test-fired seven missiles off its east coast, South Korean officials said, in what appeared to be a calculated message of defiance timed for the US Independence Day holiday.

The launches fuelled regional tensions after the communist state's nuclear test in May, which coincided with the US Memorial Day holiday.

They came as Washington seeks support for tough enforcement of United Nations sanctions aimed at shutting down the North's nuclear and missile programmes.

Seoul's foreign ministry said the first four weapons launched into the Sea of Japan (East Sea) were ballistic missiles, which the North is banned from firing under various Security Council resolutions.

South Korea's military said the fifth, sixth and seventh missiles were of the same type. The seventh was fired at 5.40 pm (0840 GMT).

It was the first time in three years that the North had fired multiple ballistic missiles. It test-fired a long-range Taepodong-2 missile, along with six and mid-range missiles, on US Independence Day in 2006.

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,27574,25732165-38196,00.html
 
Would I be wrong in thinking that all this is doing is making it impossible for China to support them?  Is there any serious positive side that can emerge from this for NK?
 
It seems North Korea has launched a "cyber offensive". And Kim Jong Il makes another rare appearance:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090708/ap_on_re_as/as_skorea_cyber_attack

Officials: N. Korea believed behind cyber attacks
          Hyung-jin Kim, Associated Press Writer – Wed Jul 8, 7:53 am ET
SEOUL, South Korea – South Korean intelligence officials believe North Korea or pro-Pyongyang forces committed cyber attacks that paralyzed major South Korean and U.S. government Web sites, aides to two lawmakers said Wednesday.

The sites of 11 South Korean organizations, including the presidential Blue House and the Defense Ministry, went down or had access problems since late Tuesday, according to the state-run Korea Information Security Agency. Agency spokeswoman Ahn Jeong-eun said 11 U.S. sites suffered similar problems. She said the agency is investigating the case with police and prosecutors.

In the U.S., the Treasury Department, Secret Service, Federal Trade Commission and Transportation Department Web sites were all down at varying points over the July 4 holiday weekend and into this week, according to American officials inside and outside the government.

Others familiar with the U.S. outage, which is called a denial of service attack, said that the fact that the government Web sites were still being affected three days after it began signaled an unusually lengthy and sophisticated attack. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak on the matter.

The Korea Information Security Agency also attributed the attacks to denial of service.


Yang Moo-jin, a professor at Seoul's University of North Korean Studies, said he doubts whether the impoverished North has the capability to knock down the Web sites.

But Hong Hyun-ik, an analyst at the Sejong Institute think tank, said the attack could have been done by either North Korea or China, saying he "heard North Korea has been working hard to hack into" South Korean networks.

On Wednesday, the National Intelligence Service told a group of South Korean lawmakers it believes that North Korea or North Korean sympathizers "were behind" the attacks, according to an aide to one of lawmakers who was briefed on the information.

An aide to another lawmaker who was briefed also said the NIS suspects North Korea or its followers were responsible.

The aides spoke on condition of anonymity and refused to allow the names of the lawmakers they work for to be published, citing the classified nature of the information.

Both aides said the information was delivered in writing to lawmakers who serve on the National Assembly's intelligence committee.

The National Intelligence Service — South Korea's main spy agency — declined to confirm the information.

South Korea's Yonhap news agency said military intelligence officers were looking at the possibility that the attack may have been committed by North Korean hackers and pro-North Korea forces in South Korea. South Korea's Defense Ministry said it could not confirm the report.

Earlier Wednesday, the NIS said in a statement that 12,000 computers in South Korea and 8,000 computers overseas had been infected and used for the cyber attack.

The agency said it believed the attack was "thoroughly" prepared and committed by hackers "at the level of a certain organization or state." It said it was cooperating with the American investigators to examine the case.

South Korean media reported in May that North Korea was running a cyber warfare unit that tries to hack into U.S. and South Korean military networks to gather confidential information and disrupt service.

An initial investigation in South Korea found that many personal computers were infected with a virus program ordering them to visit major official Web sites in South Korea and the U.S. at the same time, Korean information agency official Shin Hwa-su said. There has been no immediate reports of similar cyber attack in other Asian countries.

Yonhap said that prosecutors have found some of the cyber attacks on the South Korean sites were accessed from overseas. Yonhap, citing an unnamed prosecution official, said the cyber attack used a method common to Chinese hackers.

Prosecutors were not immediately available for comment.

Shin, the Information Security Agency official, said the initial probe had not yet uncovered evidence about where the cyber outages originated. Police also said they had not discovered where the outages originated. Police officer Jeong Seok-hwa said that could take several days.

Some of the South Korean sites remained unstable or inaccessible Wednesday. The site of the presidential Blue House could be accessed, but those for the Defense Ministry, the ruling Grand National Party and the National Assembly could not.

Ahn said there were no immediate reports of financial damage or leaking of confidential national information. The alleged attacks appeared aimed only at paralyzing Web sites, she said.

South Korea's Defense Ministry and Blue House said that there has been no leak of any documents.

___

Associated Press writers Jae-soon Chang and Wanjin Park in Seoul and Lolita C. Baldor in Washington contributed to this report.

(This version CORRECTS to remove references to sympathizers in South Korea.)

NKorea's Kim pays homage to late father

SEOUL (AFP) - North Korea's leader Kim Jong-Il, appearing gaunt and thin, made a rare televised appearance Wednesday to pay homage to his late father Kim Il-Sung at a national memorial service.


It was only the second time that contemporaneous footage of the 67-year-old has been aired on state television since his reported stroke last August.


Kim limped slightly as he entered Pyongyang Indoor Stadium and took a seat on stage, a video clip seen in Seoul showed.


The film showed the leader with thinning hair when he bowed his head for a brief silent tribute to mark the 15th anniversary of his father's death.


Kim was last shown at an event when he attended the first meeting of the country's new parliament in April.


This year's anniversary comes amid high international tensions over the communist state's missile launches and its May nuclear test.


US and South Korean officials believe the apparently ailing leader is staging a show of strength to bolster his authority as he tries to put in place a succession plan involving his youngest son, Jong-Un.


Earlier in the day Kim visited Pyongyang's Kumsusan Memorial Palace, where the embalmed body of his father lies inside a glass coffin.


He was accompanied by top military officials including defence minister Kim Yong-Chun, the official Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) reported.


State media has carried a series of hagiographical reports on Kim Il-Sung's "immortal feats," and his son's achievements in preserving the legacy, in an apparent attempt to bolster support for Jong-Il.


The two Kims are the subject of an all-embracing personality cult. Kim Il-Sung was declared president for eternity after he died of a heart attack on July 8, 1994 at the age of 82.


Documentaries on the late leader are being broadcast on television and in cinemas, KCNA said.


"The films show impressively the great life of the President who had converted the motherland into a country the master of which is the popular masses, always finding himself among the people," it said.


"He willingly took boiled rice mixed with cereals, saying that when the people eat boiled millet, we should take the same food."


At the memorial service, ceremonial head of state Kim Yong-Nam described "Great Leader" Kim Il-Sung as a "peerlessly great man who the Korean people greeted and held in high esteem for the first time in the history of spanning five thousand years."


He described Kim Il-Sung was an "invincible and iron-willed commander who ushered in a new era of the anti-imperialist struggle."


Soldiers, civilians and schoolchildren laid floral baskets before statues of the late Kim in various parts of the country, KCNA said.


An "endless stream" of people was said to have visited a huge bronze statue at Pyongyang's Mansu Hill unveiled in 1972 to mark his 60th birthday.

A remembrance concert at a Pyongyang theatre began with a female solo and a chorus singing "Everlasting Smile of the President," the music pervading the building "with boundless reverence for the peerlessly great man," KCNA said.
 
Beijing's concerns, as stated in the article, may later translate into their pulling their support for Kim Jong Il's regime once and for all.

http://www.asiasentinel.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1960&Itemid=179

Top China Advisor Sees Possible New Korean War     
Tag it:Written by Mark O'Neill   
Monday, 06 July 2009 
This time Kim Jong-Il may not be bluffing

In an alarming analysis in an official Chinese publication, a senior advisor to the Chinese government expects North Korea to launch a war on the South in the belief that it has overwhelming military superiority.

Zhang Lianggui, a professor of International Strategy at the Central Communist Party School in Beijing, also writes that he regards Pyongyang's nuclear program as posing a significant and unprecedented danger to China.


Zhang, who has been at the school since 1989, is a specialist on North Korea, where he studied at Kim Il-Sung University in Pyongyang from 1964-1968. His analysis, in the June 16 issue of World Affairs magazine, is one of the most critical of the North ever to appear in an official publication. It reflects Beijing's rising anger with its neighbor and frustration that it can do so little to change its nuclear policy – despite the fact that the country relies upon it for supplies of food and oil.

The first generation of Communist leaders had strong sympathy for Kim Il-Sung, who studied at secondary school in northeast China, spoke Mandarin and fought with Chinese forces against the Japanese. The current leaders have no such feeling for his son, whom they regard as a bandit.

In the magazine, Zhang wrote that the world underestimates the magnitude of the risk on the Korean Peninsula.

"If we look at the situation as it is, the likelihood of a military confrontation on the Korean Peninsula is very high," he wrote. "It will start on the sea and then could spread to the 38th parallel. If a war breaks out, it is very difficult to forecast how it would develop. North Korea believes it now has nuclear weapons and has become stronger. It believes that it has overwhelming military superiority over the south and would certainly win a war," he said.

Since the end of the Korean war in June 1953, the North has never recognized the Northern Limit Line (NLL) which the United States designated at the time as the sea boundary between the two sides and which the South accepts. On January 17, it repeated its refusal to recognize the boundary. A scene of bloody clashes between the two sides, the area contains 2,500 islands and is rich in fishing resources.

There has been a gradual escalation in tension since January, when the North announced a “state of total war” with the South. It has since then tested long-range missiles and a nuclear bomb.

Zhang also said that the North's nuclear tests pose “a risk that it [China] had never faced for thousands of years.” Nuclear tests by the US, Russia, China, Britain and France were carried out in deserts or remote places far from population centers. But the North's tests are just 85 km from the Chinese border, Changbai county in Jilin province, and 180 km from Yanji, a city of 400,000 people.

"The tests are close to densely populated areas of East Asia. If there were an accident, it would not only make the Korean nation homeless but also turn to nothing plans to revive the northeast of China," he wrote, asking why the tests were far from Pyongyang but not far from China.

"The danger for China is extremely grave. We have not paid sufficient attention to this risk. If we cannot bring about a denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, mankind will pay a heavy price, especially the countries bordering Korea," he wrote.

Pyongyang, he said, has never liked the six-party talks that have been trying, with Beijing's help, to get the North to relinquish its nuclear program because it regards the matter as essentially a bilateral issue to be settled with the United States alone. He does not believe North Korea will return to the stalled talks.

"North Korea has turned from being a non-nuclear state into a nuclear one. In addition, it has at least 800,000 tonnes of heavy fuel [under terms of an earlier shut down of the country's main nuclear reactor]. The six-party talks have fulfilled their historical mission."

Zhang said that Kim Jong-Il is racing to fulfill the mission given to him by his father before he hands over power to his successor, expected to be his youngest son Kim Jong-woon, 25.

This includes making North Korea a nuclear state, a symbol of a powerful country: developing missiles capable of delivering these nuclear weapons, re-negotiating the NLL and obtaining possession of the five major islands in the western sea and their rich fishing grounds, using nuclear weapons to create a new international environment and achieve reunification.

Zhang's assessment of Pyongyang reflects Beijing's anger against North Korea and inability to influence policy there.


"Negotiating with North Korea is like negotiating with the mafia which is blackmailing you," said Wang Wen, a veteran Chinese journalist. "Beijing continues to supply the North with food, oil, consumer goods and other items it needs. The North does not pay. It [China] could cut off the supply, which would lead to a collapse of the regime. That would mean a unified Korea dominated by the United States. Pyongyang knows this and continues to blackmail China, like the mafia."

He said that, to prevent this scenario, Beijing has continued to keep the regime afloat. "For years, it has been pushing the North to follow its example of economic reform and not political reform. The Kaesong industrial park is a small step in this direction, but there is nothing else."


The park, a joint venture between North and South Korea10 km north of the demilitarized zone, employed 40,000 North Korean workers in more than 75 South Korean factories as of July last year. In June, the North demanded new average salaries of US$300 a month, up from US$75, which the South has ruled as unacceptable. The wages go largely to the North Korean government.

"Beijing understands very well the mind-set of Kim Jong-Il," said Wang. "It is the same as that of Mao Zedong when he built China's nuclear bomb in the 1960s, when his people were starving. The Soviet Union did not help and the US wanted to bomb the site, but it built the bomb anyway. North Korea today is more isolated than China was then, so it needs the bomb even more."
 
From a rational point of view, a military assault on the ROK by the DPRK would be a no win operation. Any initial gains would be overturned by a US led counter attack, and even absent that, the North Korean army would probably vaporize once the soldiers were able to gain access to the riches of the South. The economy of the DPRK would not be able to deal with the logistical demands of any long term military operation either (and this assumes the Chinese would not close the logistics lifeline if such an operation was undertaken).

Of course, we are not dealing with a rational regime, and many of the organs that run the DPRK are compromised by the need to maintain the favour of the "Dear Leader". I have seen no evidence that a  Count Claus von Stauffenberg exists inside the DPRK and it seems to be the nature of these sorts of regimes that people will go with the regime until it is obviously collapsing around them. (You might note that there was a resistance movement against Hitler as far back as 1938, but they could never get enough support to take action so long as Hitler led a successful regime).

Thinking back to Robert Kaplan's article, a military operation, especially once it begins to go sour, may trigger a civil war within the DPRK as generals fight to claim resource bases and essentially become territorial warlords to preserve their own power and position. The Chinese may well be drawn into such a war simply to preserve their own backyard from the effects of a Korean war, especially floods of North Korean refugees seeking food and shelter, and nuclear armed warlords on their border. They would also be worried about the effects of the aftermath of a war, particularly the influence of the United States on a reunified Korea, and the attitude of the Koreans themselves (particularly if they believe that the Chinese somehow encouraged the DPRK or gave the DPRK the ability to start the war in the first place).

The DPRK was an interesting and amusing cats paw for the Chinese for many decades, allowing them to distract potential rivals like the United States, the ROK and Japan for very little investment on their part, but now the risks have escalated far beyond any possible rewards, and I believe the Chinese will take positive steps to restrain the DPRK for benefit of China. Throttling the flow of food and oil to the DPRK is the best, easiest and lowest risk option, and also involves little loss of "face" for the Chinese, I predict this is in fact the means they will go about it.
 
Back
Top