Loachman said:That looks like it ties (clamps?) in well with the "rum, sodomy, and the lash" thing that somebody didn't post about.
Jed said:I thought that was what rubber boots were for? :camo:
GAP said:I'll bow to experience (as long as I don't have to put my feet into boots).......but, doesn't that limit movement? ;D
ArmyVern said:I'm here to tell you that boots - especially the tall type - in no way limit movement. Do not. 8)
RCDcpl said:...I'd be far more concerned when it's time to go out into the field or on tour with a bunch of combat arms guys who haven't seen a female in weeks/months.
GAP said:I'll bow to experience (as long as I don't have to put my feet into boots).......but, doesn't that limit movement? ;D
ArmyVern said:Also nothing that she'd need to be concerned with.
curious george said:I geuss that backs up PMedMoe who said, "And most of us aren't rough'."
PMedMoe said:Guess that depends on your definition of rough.
This one could apply to several of us: informal - ill or physically upset: he felt rough after an evening of heavy drinking :blotto:
daftandbarmy said:I've encountered a few military stereotypes recently.
I find that, once civilans find out you have a military background, they automatically assume that you are ethical, competent, trustworthy, self-disciplined, personally courageous, physically strong, a protector of the weak, are a natural born leader and a strong team player, as well as unfailingly reliable and movingly patriotic.
My biggest challenge is living up to that stereotype. :nod: