ObedientiaZelum said:Keep trying different allergists.
Motard said:I was just about to say this as well, if the reaction is as minimal as you describe you could probably find someone else that's willing to remove the epi-pen prescription.
ModlrMike said:What you consider a mild reaction, and what the CF / RMO considers a mild reaction can be vastly different. In my judgement, ANY oral symptoms would be grounds for disqualification. That you haven't had what you consider a severe reaction yet, doesn't mean you won't.
goinghomebroke said:Well, tough luck. I suggest you fight this. I personally know someone who is allergic to bee stings and is in a field unit. so this makes absolutely no sense.
medicineman said:As for folks suggesting shopping for docs, one of the questions that people neglect to read on the little form letters eople have to get filled out by their doctors is this one: "How long has this person been under your care?" - the RMO reads this as much as the medical folks do for people getting driver licensing medicals done and really do take that into account.
Motard said:I went to a walk-in clinic to get my medical done, wasn't an issue.
Jester_TG said:I'm sure there are 100's if not 1000's of applicants to the CF that do not have a family physician. Many people use walk-ins as their primary care source. I'm sure RC's see it all the time.
davidf33 said:Thanks for all the input. Today I had my FDL filled out again. My family doctor in which I've been in the care of for 21 years has said that based on my latest allergy test results, there is no reason for me to have an EpiPen. Like I said before, my allergist recommends them to everyone as a precaution. My doctor agreed with this, noting that technically everybody should carry an EpiPen in that case because really nobody knows exactly what they're allergic to. We could all have a severe allergy to something but we just haven't been exposed to it. But with regards to my case he cleared me of needing an EpiPen and said that my allergy is mild and normal with no risk of anaphylaxis whatsoever. I'm still planning on getting a food challenge completed so I will have more evidence to back up my appeal. I know I can pass the food challenge as I have already eaten fish lately and did so with minimal reaction. I have no reason not to believe that my chances of getting accepted this time around are greater. What do you guys think? I mean this is a doctor telling me I do not have a severe reaction, why would the Medical Officers in Ottawa look at it and say "No, it's severe". Let me know if you guys think I have a better chance this time, again, all your feedback is greatly appreciated. And as for the person in an earlier post that said "some people just aren't cut out for the military", you're an idiot. As if complete dumb asses haven't been accepted before. Just because I have an allergy doesn't mean I'm not cut out for it, if I do get accepted I'd probably make half the recruits look dumb with regards to fitness. I asked for positive feedback, lets keep it that way.
Thanks again,
David
davidf33 said:And as for the person in an earlier post that said "some people just aren't cut out for the military", you're an idiot. As if complete dumb asses haven't been accepted before. Just because I have an allergy doesn't mean I'm not cut out for it, if I do get accepted I'd probably make half the recruits look dumb with regards to fitness. I asked for positive feedback, lets keep it that way.
Thanks again,
David
davidf33 said:And as for the person in an earlier post that said "some people just aren't cut out for the military", you're an idiot. As if complete dumb asses haven't been accepted before. Just because I have an allergy doesn't mean I'm not cut out for it, if I do get accepted I'd probably make half the recruits look dumb with regards to fitness. I asked for positive feedback, lets keep it that way.
davidf33 said:Thanks for all the input. Today I had my FDL filled out again. My family doctor in which I've been in the care of for 21 years has said that based on my latest allergy test results, there is no reason for me to have an EpiPen. Like I said before, my allergist recommends them to everyone as a precaution. My doctor agreed with this, noting that technically everybody should carry an EpiPen in that case because really nobody knows exactly what they're allergic to. We could all have a severe allergy to something but we just haven't been exposed to it. But with regards to my case he cleared me of needing an EpiPen and said that my allergy is mild and normal with no risk of anaphylaxis whatsoever. I'm still planning on getting a food challenge completed so I will have more evidence to back up my appeal. I know I can pass the food challenge as I have already eaten fish lately and did so with minimal reaction. I have no reason not to believe that my chances of getting accepted this time around are greater. What do you guys think? I mean this is a doctor telling me I do not have a severe reaction, why would the Medical Officers in Ottawa look at it and say "No, it's severe". Let me know if you guys think I have a better chance this time, again, all your feedback is greatly appreciated. And as for the person in an earlier post that said "some people just aren't cut out for the military", you're an idiot. As if complete dumb asses haven't been accepted before. Just because I have an allergy doesn't mean I'm not cut out for it, if I do get accepted I'd probably make half the recruits look dumb with regards to fitness. I asked for positive feedback, lets keep it that way.
Thanks again,
David