• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Media Bias [Merged]

Apple2018 said:
CBC is under attack in the House of Commons today, with 4 petitions brought forward; they only had 4000 signatures though.

In 9 posts you have questioned the sovereignty of Canada, and you have brought us the glorious news that "CBC is under attack in the House of Commons today, with 4 petitions brought forward"

What is your point, or do you really have a point? Do a whole lot more reading before you engage your keyboard.
 
Apple2018 said:
CBC is under attack in the House of Commons today, with 4 petitions brought forward; they only had 4000 signatures though.

He is refering to http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/sunnews/politics/archives/2012/01/20120130-211128.html I think.
 
Apple2018 said:
@Sythen:

That is the article dealing with the CBC...I should have pasted something!
GAP said:
Don't bother
Yes, please don't. We already have enough people whose whole life is posting nothing but links that most people don't look at.
 
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/story/2012/01/31/f-vp-mcguire-ombudsman-bc-legislature.html?cmp=rss&utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

CBC Editor in Chief responds to Ombudsman decision


No conflict in B.C. legislature reporting, Jennifer McGuire states

By Jennifer McGuire, CBC News - Jan 31, 2012 12:13 PM PT

Jennifer McGuire is general manager and editor in chief of CBC News.


Thanks to the dedication and excellence of our staff, CBC News is one of the most respected news organizations in the world. As I have said many times, we should always strive to be even better by continuously examining what we do and how we do it.

The CBC is the only broadcast organization in this country with an arm's length ombudsman process.

The ombudsman is appointed by the CBC's board of directors and by the president. His mandate is to review complaints about our work and to judge them within the framework of the high standards outlined in our Journalistic Standards and Practices, by which our employees are bound.

In most cases we agree with and take into account the Ombudsman's rulings. The recent ruling on one of our reporters at the B.C. Legislature, however, is an exception where we will have to agree to disagree.

Stephen Smart is a legislative reporter based in Victoria B.C. He is married to Rebecca Scott who recently took a job as a media adviser to Premier Christy Clark.

Scott is one of six media advisers to the premier, and although she is not the senior adviser, when Stephen brought the situation to our attention we created a protocol to ensure an absence of conflict, whether real or perceived.

This protocol is in line with our Journalistic Standards and Practices and corporate policies.

The protocol itself, which is shared with senior staff in Vancouver and Toronto, explicitly states that Stephen Smart will not cover:

1. Stories in which Rebecca Scott is the principal, or sole spokesperson. 2. Stories where she is the primary source where alternate documents or materials are not available.

If there is uncertainty about Stephen's assignments, they are reviewed by Vancouver's Executive Producer or News Director. In all our coverage, story choice, assignment and lineup rests with assignment editors, producers and senior news staff. If there is a perceived conflict, the story gets assigned elsewhere.

It is important to note that both the ruling and the original complaints with the Ombudsman's office have not raised any concerns with Stephen's reporting, which we believe is a confirmation that our protocols are working effectively.

None of the reports filed by Stephen Smart have ever been found to be in breach of our journalist standards.

The news business is a tight-knit community, especially in smaller environments like the B.C. Legislature. It's inevitable that from time to time journalists may form personal relationships with people who may, one day, intersect with their professional lives.

Although the current situation is obviously not ideal, we believe we have mitigated the risks and, despite the opinion of the Ombudsman, have fulfilled our obligations to our Journalistic Standards and Practices and corporate policies, which state:

"Independence is a core value of CBC. If a current affairs or news employee has a close relative, defined as spouse, parent, child or sibling who is a major actor in a story, that employee cannot be involved in the coverage. It is the responsibility of the employee to inform his/her supervisor of the potential conflict so that a protocol can be developed."

The protocols we have created strike a balance between the need to address potential conflicts of interest and the rights of individuals to their private lives. We believe we have struck an appropriate balance in this case and believe no further action is required.

We will continue to monitor and assess what we do in BC, as is the case with all of our journalism.
 
Sooo...if the ombudsman says there is a conflict of interest, and management chooses to ignore the ombudsman, why does the CBC need an ombudsman?
 
The CBC is the only broadcast organization in this country with an arm's length ombudsman process.


...and at times, even greater than an arm's length, when the CBC picks and chooses when its ombudsman is right or wrong.  ::)
 
And better yet is having friends on your payroll:

http://chasingapplepie.blogspot.com/2012/02/friends-of-cbc-on-cbc-payroll.html

Friends of CBC on the CBC Payroll

Did you know that three members of Friends of CBC are on the CBC payroll?  Yup! That's what Canadian Taxpayers Federation found out  through Access to Information.

Amongst the many Access to Information (ATI) enquiries we make each year was this tidbit relating to the CBC. Our National Research Director, Derek Fildebrandt got to thinking about the leadership of the Friends of Canadian Broadcasting, the group that advocates for more funding for the CBC.

“What if these people are actually on the CBC’s payroll?” thought Derek.
If it were true, it would go a long way to explaining their passion for public broadcasting. And it would be very, very funny.

We finally got our answer, after a long wait. As it turns out, the situation is actually pretty funny. ATI documents show that three members of the ‘Friends’ Steering Committee actually were on the CBC payroll.

Aritha van Herk was paid to write poems and was paid $6,322. David Tars was paid to be a “reader” and was paid $277, while Stephen Kimber was paid $675 as a “freelance[r].”

These are quite small sums of money – especially in the latter two cases – however this is by no means the whole picture.  Some of the individuals refused to disclose their financial arrangements with the CBC, resulting in about 85 pages of the ATI documents being blanked out.
Those refusing to disclose their financial dealings with the CBC include the ‘Friends’ spokesperson Ian Morrison, Chairperson Noreen Golfman and members Anna-Marie Dekker, Maggie Siggins and R.H. Thomson.
Somewhere in the 85 blanked out pages, at least one of these names is sure to be found.

It sort of makes you think – if your goal is to demonstrate public support for the CBC, wouldn’t you put members of the public on your board, rather than CBC contractors?

What do you think of that? More and more everyday CBC is proving unworthy of taxpayers money.  I say how about we stop subsidizing the State Broadcaster.  That way they can spend their money anyway they want just not with my money.
 
Friends and enemies:

http://bcblue.wordpress.com/2012/02/13/cbc-claims-copyright-only-against-its-enemies/

CBC claims copyright only against its enemies
February 13, 2012 — BC Blue

When you are a friend of the CBC like Jamie Watt is, they apparently don’t have a problem at all with a communication company’s website like his Navigator looking like a CBC affiliate but if you are a critic, they send in the copyright police.

This video was posted on YouTube by blogger Blazing Cat Fur: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dAw0muE2NxQ&feature=player_embedded

To see what the CBC got their panties in a bunch about, Sun News still has it available here.

Since *we* own the CBC, I wonder if we can sue to get *our* copyright material back? That would be an interesting question for legal minds to ponder.
 
I'm curious if this will actually mean anything to her career?? 


http://www.torontosun.com/2012/02/17/radio-canada-ombudsman-calls-own-journalist-biased

OTTAWA - In a stinging rebuke, Radio-Canada ombudsman Pierre Tourangeau said journalist Ginette Lamarche was biased, used unverified facts and was inaccurate in her recent reporting on Israel.
Tourangeau overturned a finding by the state broadcaster's complaints department that had largely dismissed complaints from Honest Reporting Canada over five reports on Mideast issues aired last December. Tourangeau found the reports failed to show balance, impartiality, and accuracy as required by Radio-Canada's own journalistic standards.

In a December 19 radio report, Lamarche claimed "many Palestinians spend a good part of their youth in jail for participating in a demonstration or throwing stones," without citing a reliable source for this claim. According to Honest Reporting Canada, convicted stone throwers in fact spend an average of seven months behind bars.
"I am very happy with the decision obtained by Honest Reporting," said David Ouellette, associate director of Quebec public affairs with the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs, which regularly collaborates with Honest Reporting Canada.

Ouellette added they'd received many similar decisions about this journalist since 2008.
Representatives from the state broadcaster assured Ouellette last September that they took complaints related to Mideast affairs seriously.

"However," said Ouellette, "we do not notice any improvement."


brigitte.pellerin@sunmedia.ca
 
On the one hand, the CBC's 2012-13 Main Estimates (attached) show no net increase/decrease.

On the other hand, if you believe unattributed sections from this Calgary Herald piece:
.... The CBC meantime, which has an annual budget of $1.1 billion, faces a cut of at least $110 million and possibly more. Some Conservatives are pushing for even deeper cuts to the national broadcaster, based on the argument that, though the radio news service is clearly a must-have in the Far North and more generally in rural areas, CBC television is not as essential. On the immediate chopping block is a $60-million programming "top-up" that the broadcaster has received annually since 2001 ....
We'll have to see what the Budget holds in store for the Mother Corp....
 
milnews.ca said:
On the one hand, the CBC's 2012-13 Main Estimates (attached) show no net increase/decrease.

On the other hand, if you believe unattributed sections from this Calgary Herald piece:We'll have to see what the Budget holds in store for the Mother Corp....

Looks like there was a $340M transfer from radio (arguably the more valuable element of CBC/SRC) to TV/digital video, but otherwise $1,074M ($1.1B) is the same, as you noted, Milnew.ca.

Regards
G2G
 
Good2Golf said:
Looks like there was a $340M transfer from radio (arguably the more valuable element of CBC/SRC) to TV/digital video, but otherwise $1,074M ($1.1B) is the same, as you noted, Milnew.ca.

Regards
G2G
I saw that, too, but I noticed a similar (but not identical) increase in the "Television, Radio and Digital Services" line, so I'm guessing it's a shuffle of "radio only" $ into a newly-consolidated "radio, too" unit that also does radio.  Ah, the magic of "convergence" ....
 
N. McKay said:
Isn't it one of those trades that changes with rank, like stokers (mechanic-technician-artificer)?

If so, could someone outline the progression please?
Actually for info, as of 1 Feb 2012, it is just Marine Engineer, now MOSID 0367 (from 00121, 00122 and 00123- or in the 'old' days 311, 312 and 313). I think all will go this route eventually. The Naval Electrician  (ETech) trade did it too last year.

Pat
 
CDN Aviator said:
Med A is now called Med Tech. PAs are a different group.

There are still (some) Med As (MOSID 00150-12 and 00150-13) in the Reserves, Med A vs Med Tech depends on qualifications (pre-hospital/primary care paramedic versus nursing assistant/hospital-based care).  In Reg Fce they all are indeed Med Techs.
 
I just read that CBC has trotted out young Omar K......and are all atwitter with him.

Link

http://www.cbc.ca/video/news/audioplayer.html?clipid=2206321944


Mehar Arar, not Omar K.
 
Strike said:
It's also a matter of the liaison (PAO or whoever it happens to be) emphasizing the importance of stating certain points and why.  Media aren't military.  They don't always understand how important certain things are.

In 1999, we had a PAO at Gagetown who regularly referred to M109s as "Canada's heavy tank, like the German Tiger" in her prep school accent!
 
Back
Top