• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

LPC leadership race - 2025

We were supposed to be on a steady, if difficult, march towards progress. And yet, just a few weeks ago, the United States voted for a second time to not elect its first woman president," Trudeau said, adding that "women's rights and women's progress" are "under attack."

Liberals could have had their first female PM. Maybe next time.
 
Liberals could have had their first female PM. Maybe next time.

Happy Dave Bautista GIF by My Spy
 
That's a good question ,for all the harping I do on the average person's lack of understanding of the Parliamentary system. I'm embarrassed to say I'm not sure...
So theoretically, immediately after being sworn in he could ask the GG to dissolve parliament.
I suspect however if they might just hold off on a full blown election and settle for the status quo and just call a by election in a safe riding
But as I say I'm not sure .
Pardon me while I go off and google for awhile.
 
The Liberal Party of Canada has learned nothing, the only question that remains is have Canadians learned anything?

I would like to think that Canadians have but I suspect I will be disappointed by Canadians and I expect to continue to be disappointed by Canada as a nation and as a state due to the actions of the Liberal Party and those who vote for it.

The Liberal Party only exists to feed the Liberal Party.
 
Here's his speech

…at least there was a qualified referral to energy (assuming he didn’t just mean nuclear, solar and wind…)

…A plan that makes Canada an energy superpower...
 
Liberals could have had their first female PM. Maybe next time.
If the Liberals lose the election, don’t expect Carney to hang around long. he’ll go back to the board rooms. That’s where the money is. Then the Liberals will again need to pick a new leader.
 
…at least there was a qualified referral to energy (assuming he didn’t just mean nuclear, solar and wind…)
I think the conventional means comment was referring to O&G. Say what you will about Carney, he is supremely qualified to manage a G7 economy, he knows where our bread is buttered.

I think that transcript was provided by the party, and I think he ad libbed a bit that's not in the transcript - I'm 100% certain that in the actual speech he said "A plan that makes Canada an energy superpower, both clean and conventional". I believe he added the "both clean and conventional" bit on the fly. He knows that's a political vulnerability of his and that he needs to throw some reassurance out to oil and gas. Right at the end he also talks about mines, ports, and logging roads. He was definitely mindful of the resource sector in his speech.

Based on the content of the speech, I'd be very surprised if we don't have an election called very soon. He's clearly trying to capture a couple different sources of energy: fending off Trump, but also whatever it is that has driven a significant enough swing in popular support away from Poilievre. If he can actually catch that and hold it he may have a chance. I don't see any realistic way it makes sense to wait much at all.

To clear up the lingering questions about who's who in the zoo: Mark Carney is the leader of the Liberal Party of Canada, but is not yet Prime Minister. Justin Trudeau announced that he would resign as Prime Minister, but he has not yet. He is still the Prime Minister as sworn in by the Governor General. By convention that role goes to the leader of the party commanding confidence in the House of Commons, but it doesn't pass automatically in an instance like this. Once Trudeau formally resigns, then, also by convention, the new leader will be sworn in as PM. As he does not currently have a seat in the Commons, it'll be a rare but not unprecedented case of a Prime Minister leading from the gallery- save for the likelihood that Carney will ask the GG to dissolve Parliament and call an election so that he can try to earn a seat and a mandate. I don't know if he'd make that ask the same time as he's sworn in, or if he'll look to meet with cabinet first. Won't be long though.

I'm curious what seat he'll run for. And, however this plays out, I suspect we'd best prepare ourselves for another minority government of one colour or another.
 
I'm curious what seat he'll run for. And, however this plays out, I suspect we'd best prepare ourselves for another minority government of one colour or another.
Perfection. My main reason I want MMPR is it'll ensure we never have a majority government again. Compromise forces moderation at either of the spectrum.
 
Perfection. My main reason I want MMPR is it'll ensure we never have a majority government again. Compromise forces moderation at either of the spectrum.
I tend to see it that way too. I've been thinking for a while that I want to see a minority government following the next election; just not sure yet which colour I want leading it.

Should the next election go blue, Poilievre will probably have his work cut out for him if he has to govern with a minority. I don't get the sense that achieving consensus across party lines is likely to be a strength of his.
 
Back
Top