• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Liberal Party of Canada Leadership

Status
Not open for further replies.
Regardless of what you might think of Trudeau the Elder, he had far more gravitas and statesmanship in his little finger than the Younger has in his entire body. It's no excuse top say "he's still young and inexperienced": the Game is already on, and he's in it.

I could, perhaps, see myself voting Liberal at some point, maybe. But not with this guy at the helm. He has to learn to engage brain before starting mouth, or he will be eaten for breakfast.
 
pbi said:
.....voting Liberal at some point, maybe. But not with this guy at the helm.
I can only guess that he'd be a snappier dancer if he were to pirouette behind the Queen.



Google it kids; it's a reference that predates Bieber's birth or Harry Potter being written.  ;)
 
Journeyman said:
I can only guess that he'd be a snappier dancer if he were to pirouette behind the Queen.



Google it kids; it's a reference that predates Bieber's birth or Harry Potter being written.  ;)

I didn't say "a lot of gravitas". I said "far more". :)
 
Thing headed south for the LPC when John Manley stated that he would not seek party leadership...
:not-again:

Mr. Campbell, you and others will likely have a long time to wait for a worthy contender to provide a true check and balance to the CPC.





*edited for spelling*
 
Good2Golf said:
Thing headed south for the LPC when John Manley stated that he would not seek party leadership...
:not-again:

Mr. Campbell, you and others will likely have a long time to wait for a worthy contended to provide a true check and balance to the CPC.


I agree with you on both counts. John Manley might be the best PM we never had. But, in my opinion the LPC headed south in the mid 1960s when Lester Pearson, an otherwise admirable man, made two blunders:

    1. He accepted, even embraced the Tom Kent/Kingston 1960 "lurch to the left" which was, and remains, unaffordable. It was, and still is, the worst sort of pandering politics; and

    2. To regain his party's position in Québec he recruited the so called "three wise men:" Jean Marchand, Gérard Pelletier and Pierre Trudeau who, collectively, dragged the LPC from the centre to the left of centre area of the political spectrum.

The Liberals have never been able to drag themselves back to the centre: too much pandering to many special interests has cemented the Grits in the wrong economic space.

I continue to support the CPC, especially financially, for two reasons:

    1. I believe in political engagement ~ BUT not for serving CF members;

    2. I think the CPC is, at the policy level, far less dangerous than either the LPC or the NDP.
 
I'm seeing, as Justin Trudeau progresses, through the recent months an interesting trend.  Keep in mind I have no way of verifying this but...

His blunders and verbal strokes seem to somehow be getting worse even though he's presented himself quite well recently. 

I'm wondering, how long it will take before his off hand ill thought comments will start to take a toll.  For now he seems to be teflon. Nothing seems to stick.

Could it be that no one really cares about any of that or that they are too enamoured with him to really be bothered.  Or could it be that he (or rather his team) is just good at damage control?

Take his latest gaff.  By all accounts that was a dumb thing to say.  Reaction was viral.  No response from Trudeau.  In fact, he is conspicuously absent from QP.  Marc Garneau takes point (something he's been doing a lot lately) and acts as the Liberal strong man.  Trudeau waits a bit then issues a statement indicating his apology to Ukrainians and regret over what he said.  Problem seems to go away.

If it is by accident, then he's the luckiest politician out there.  If it is by design, the Liberals may be developping a very effective political machine.  Perhaps they have to, given that they will have to weather Justin Trudeau's ill thought comments.  It certainly won't be the last one.

I'll bet that if the Liberals do take power that Marc Garneau will be the Deputy PM.
 
Crantor said:
I'll bet that if the Liberals do take power that Marc Garneau will be the Deputy PM.

For that to happen Trudeau will have to reverse his edict that Senators are no longer part of the Liberal caucus.
 
ModlrMike said:
For that to happen Trudeau will have to reverse his edict that Senators are no longer part of the Liberal caucus.
???
Marc Garneau is the MP for Westmount—Ville-Marie; he's not in the Senate.
 
ModlrMike said:
For that to happen Trudeau will have to reverse his edict that Senators are no longer part of the Liberal caucus.

I am a little confused as to why that would need to happen.  Perhaps you thought he was a Senator and not an MP?
 
E.R. Campbell said:
I agree with you on both counts. John Manley might be the best PM we never had. But, in my opinion the LPC headed south in the mid 1960s when Lester Pearson, an otherwise admirable man, made two blunders:

    1. He accepted, even embraced the Tom Kent/Kingston 1960 "lurch to the left" which was, and remains, unaffordable. It was, and still is, the worst sort of pandering politics; and

    2. To regain his party's position in Québec he recruited the so called "three wise men:" Jean Marchand, Gérard Pelletier and Pierre Trudeau who, collectively, dragged the LPC from the centre to the left of centre area of the political spectrum.

The Liberals have never been able to drag themselves back to the centre: too much pandering to many special interests has cemented the Grits in the wrong economic space.

I continue to support the CPC, especially financially, for two reasons:

    1. I believe in political engagement ~ BUT not for serving CF members;

    2. I think the CPC is, at the policy level, far less dangerous than either the LPC or the NDP.


I agree with Marc Davis here.

None of us, as far as I can see, likes the CPC, not unreservedly. Some of us like them less and less with each passing day and policy action.

But only a tiny handful of us bother to try to change those policies. Those of us who do try joined the party.

If you don't like the CPC but think, as I do, that it is less bad than any of the others then join it and press for change.

If you don't like the CPC but find the LPC or, heaven forbid, the NDP to be the better choice then join one or the other of them and press for change to suit your views.

But, if you are anything other than a serving member, sitting in the bush and throwing sh!t is a cop out.
 
E.R. Campbell said:
I agree with Marc Davis here.

None of us, as far as I can see, likes the CPC, not unreservedly. Some of us like them less and less with each passing day and policy action.

But only a tiny handful of us bother to try to change those policies. Those of us who do try joined the party.

If you don't like the CPC but think, as I do, that it is less bad than any of the others then join it and press for change.

If you don't like the CPC but find the LPC or, heaven forbid, the NDP to be the better choice then join one or the other of them and press for change to suit your views.

But, if you are anything other than a serving member, sitting in the bush and throwing sh!t is a cop out.

I am a dues paying member of the CPC.

I have written many letters and, mostly, have received nothing but "Thanks for you correspondence of....blah, blah, blah."

Currently I don't have time to hobnob with MPs or attend party rallies and conventions, but I do support my local candidate and donate the maximum allowable.

Perhaps when I retire, I'll take time from jetting around the world, attend these rallies and conventions, hobnob with the party elite and harangue people that their opinion doesn't count unless they pay to play.

Thanks, I now have something to look forward to.
 
Crantor said:
I am a little confused as to why that would need to happen.  Perhaps you thought he was a Senator and not an MP?

My mistake. That's what I get for posting after my 12hr night shift.
 
E.R. Campbell said:
She's about as left-wing as they come. I can see her draging the Liberals into a squabble with the NDP trying to out-socialist each other over who can spend the most on the oppressed, downtrodden, latte-drinkers.

At any rate, if she's Trudeau's economic advisor kiss any defence spending goodbye.



I'm still having trouble with this one. Chrystia Freeland is a well known social journalist who wrote, from a decidedly non-economic point of view, for quality papers like The Financial Times and The Economist, much as her opponent, Linda McQuiag was the resident "loony lefty" for Conrad Black's National Post in the 1980s. She has two books to her credit: Sale of the Century, published in 2000, about Russia's  transition to capitalism and, very recently, Plutocrats: The Rise of the New Global Super-Rich and the Fall of Everyone Else which is not, at all, about economics.

Consider what she has to say about inequality. Compare it with what Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz has to say about the same issue. But there's a difference, agree with him or not, Prof Stiglitz focuses on why inequality is problematic: it is that it reduces equality of opportunity. Freeland, on the other hand, trashes companies that have gotten more and more productive because, she suggests, they have kept wages low. The fact is that wages have grown, but overall labour costs have declined because companies are working smarter ~ see the GE Canada advertisements about robots.

I think M. Trudeau has perfectly good economic advisors in John McCallum and Scott Brison, in Ms Freeland he has a polemicist and one, as Journeyman says, who represents an extreme position on the economic spectrum.

I think the Liberals went badly off the mainstream liberal economic course in the 1960s and '70s. I think Jean Chrétien, an instictive fiscal conservative, and Paul Martin dragged the Liberal Party back towards the centre ~ an overspending centre, to be sure, but far from Pierre Trudeau's vision of money growing on trees. I think Justin Trudeau is risking all the good, hard political capital Jean Chrétien spent.


Well, well, well, wasn't Chrystia Freeland a brilliant choice to be a star candidate and member of the leaders inner circle? She how well she has united the Liberal Party of Canada in this article which is reproduced under the Fair Dealing provisions of the Copyright Act from the Globe and Mail:

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/trudeau-blocks-candidacy-of-ex-mps-wife-over-bullying-complaints/article17478438/#dashboard/follows/
gam-masthead.png

Trudeau blocks candidacy of ex-MP’s wife over bullying complaints

JOAN BRYDEN
The Canadian Press

Published Thursday, Mar. 13 2014

Justin Trudeau is launching a pre-emptive strike to prevent federal Liberals from using upcoming nomination contests to resume the toxic infighting that almost destroyed the party.

His team has informed Christine Innes that she will not be allowed to run for a Liberal nomination in any riding after receiving complaints that her husband — former MP and junior cabinet minister Tony Ianno — has been using “intimidation and bullying” in a bid to lure supporters away from newly elected star recruit Chrystia Freeland.

Barring Innes is intended to send a message to all Liberals, Ontario campaign co-chair David MacNaughton said in an interview.

“We’re not going to go back to the days of the Hatfields and McCoys in the Liberal party.”

MacNaughton informed Innes of the decision early Thursday morning, outlining the accusations against her campaign team.

“Derogatory remarks were made to several young, enthusiastic Liberals about one of our leading MPs. Suggestions were made to volunteers that their future in the Liberal party would be in jeopardy if they were on the ‘wrong side’ in a nomination battle,” he said in an email to Innes.

“We have all seen what Liberals fighting with Liberals can do, not only to the electoral chances of our party but to its soul. Our leader has made it clear that this kind of behaviour is not acceptable to him, nor to the thousands of people who have embraced the new way of doing politics under Justin Trudeau’s leadership.”

Innes did not immediately respond to a request for comment. MacNaughton said Innes has denied the allegations and he acknowledged he’s seen no evidence that she personally has been involved.

“We all know where this comes from and it’s not inconsistent with previous behaviour,” he said, alluding to Ianno, who was a key organizer of the caucus revolt against former prime minister Jean Chretien.

Trudeau has promised open nomination meetings in every riding across the country, including his own. But those would-be contestants must first win the approval of the party’s “green light committee,” which has the power to block those who don’t meet certain standards.

For instance, prospective nominees who have yet to pay off past leadership campaign debts, such as David Bertschi and George Tkach, have been warned they’ll be blocked unless they can demonstrate a credible plan to retire their debts.

The decision to veto Innes adds bad-mouthing other Liberals to the list of verboten attributes.

MacNaughton acknowledged the decision will doubtless spark criticism that Trudeau’s promise to hold open nominations is hollow, that his team is showing “favouritism” to ensure victory for the leader’s hand-picked star candidates.

Some of Trudeau’s recruits, including Freeland, were showcased at the party’s convention last month, prompting some grumbling that he’s giving them a leg up in nomination contests. His team countered that opening up nominations doesn’t mean the leader can’t promote his preferred winners, as long as the contests are run fairly.

Nor does it mean the party has to tolerate a situation in which “the candidate who is left standing is the one who can browbeat and intimidate enough people into showing up (to vote),” MacNaughton said.

Innes wanted to run for the Liberal nomination in Trinity-Spadina, the downtown Toronto riding facing a byelection after Olivia Chow resigned Wednesday to run for mayor.

Ianno represented the riding from 1993 until he was defeated by Chow and the NDP in 2006. Innes herself twice lost to Chow in 2008 and 2011.

Due to redistribution, Trinity-Spadina and Freeland’s neighbouring riding, Toronto Centre, will become three new ridings for the 2015 general election.

As a condition for being green lit, the party asked Innes to promise, should she win the byelection nomination, to seek the nomination in the new riding of Spadina-Fort York in the general election, rather than University-Rosedale, where Freeland intends to run.

Similar requests have been made of other prospective byelection nominees, aimed at keeping them focused on the byelection, not on a possible future nomination war between two incumbent MPs, MacNaughton said.

“Not only did you reject this solution out of hand but your campaign team began to use intimidation and bullying on young volunteers,” he says in the email to Innes.

Party brass received several complaints from young Liberals who had worked on Freeland’s byelection campaign about the conduct of Ianno.

MacNaughton said it’s “a sad commentary” on the way Liberals spent two decades fighting each other, in the process reducing the once-mighty party to a third party rump.

Under Trudeau, the party has revived and his team is determined to nip any resumption of infighting in the bud.

“We’ve recruited thousands of new people to the party and if this is their first experience it will certainly turn them off,” MacNaughton said.

Tony Ianno was, still is, I imagine, on the right wing of the Liberal Party. He was a Paul Martin loyalist, a Manley Liberal in many respects. He is a representative of a large minority within that party, I think.

Ms Freeland is from a far, far different political world.

The Liberal party of Canada has not been united since the mid 1960s. The first big split was Trudeau/Turner, then Turner/Chrétien, then Chrétien/Martin. It is not clear, to me, where on the left-right spectrum M Trudeau stands but I am pretty sure that Ms Freeland is a silk stocking socialist who is, probably, to the left of Jean Chrétien and very close to Pierre Trudeau ~ which is to say in economic la la land.

I think M. Trudeau's preemptive strike will create more problems that it solves.
 
His team countered that opening up nominations doesn’t mean the leader can’t promote his preferred winners, as long as the contests are run fairly.

  Hunh?  ???
 
His team countered that opening up nominations doesn’t mean the leader can’t promote his preferred winners, as long as the contests are run fairly.

  Hunh?  ???

“Contrariwise,' continued Tweedledee, 'if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic.”
 
E.R. Campbell said:
Well, well, well, wasn't Chrystia Freeland a brilliant choice to be a star candidate and member of the leaders inner circle? She how well she has united the Liberal Party of Canada in this article which is reproduced under the Fair Dealing provisions of the Copyright Act from the Globe and Mail:

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/trudeau-blocks-candidacy-of-ex-mps-wife-over-bullying-complaints/article17478438/#dashboard/follows/
Tony Ianno was, still is, I imagine, on the right wing of the Liberal Party. He was a Paul Martin loyalist, a Manley Liberal in many respects. He is a representative of a large minority within that party, I think.

Ms Freeland is from a far, far different political world.

The Liberal party of Canada has not been united since the mid 1960s. The first big split was Trudeau/Turner, then Turner/Chrétien, then Chrétien/Martin. It is not clear, to me, where on the left-right spectrum M Trudeau stands but I am pretty sure that Ms Freeland is a silk stocking socialist who is, probably, to the left of Jean Chrétien and very close to Pierre Trudeau ~ which is to say in economic la la land.

I think M. Trudeau's preemptive strike will create more problems that it solves.


And it appears, according to this report, which is reproduced under the Fair Dealing provisions of the Copyright Act from the CBC, the problems are just starting:

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/zach-paikin-criticizes-justin-trudeau-as-he-ends-liberal-nomination-bid-1.2576147
logo_cbcnews.png

Zach Paikin criticizes Justin Trudeau as he ends Liberal nomination bid
Trudeau broke open nomination promise, Paikin says in ending bid to run for Liberals
By Laura Payton, CBC News

Mar 17, 2014

Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau has broken his promise to hold open nominations to find Liberal candidates for the 2015 federal election, Zach Paikin said Monday as he ended his bid to become one of those candidates.

Paikin, 22, had announced just a month ago that he would run for the Liberal nomination in the newly created federal riding of Hamilton West-Ancaster-Dundas. Two years ago, Paikin ran to be the federal Liberal Party's policy chair. He's the son of TVO journalist Steve Paikin, who has moderated televised debates of the federal party leaders.

When he announced his plan to run for the nomination in Hamilton, Paikin said on Facebook that he believed Trudeau had what it takes to be the next prime minister.

On Monday, Paikin said he was withdrawing in protest because Trudeau broke a key promise by blocking potential candidate Christine Innes from running in Trinity-Spadina to replace Olivia Chow. Chow is running for mayor of Toronto.

Paikin hadn't yet submitted his nomination papers, the Liberals told CBC News.

"I cannot, in good conscience, campaign to be a part of a team of candidates if others seeking to join that team are prevented from doing so if their ideas or ambitions run contrary to the party leader's interest," Paikin said in a statement posted to Facebook.

'Party-wide toxicity'

"I am a strong believer in our country's founding democratic principles, including: Parliament as a place for dialogue, a government that is accountable to Parliament, and party leaders who remain accountable to their respective caucuses (not vice versa). I am particularly troubled by the fact that our leader has discarded some of those principles ultimately in order to protect a star candidate," Paikin said.

The federal Liberals say Innes's husband, former Liberal MP Tony Ianno, tried to bully Liberal members in Toronto into supporting Innes over new MP Chrystia Freeland.

In a statement sent to supporters last week, Innes said the allegations were baseless, and that the Liberal Party's leadership had told her she'd only be approved to run in a byelection if she agreed in writing to run in a pre-assigned riding in 2015.

"It was made clear to me that if I did not submit to their demands that they would still get their way," Innes said, referring to unelected backroom advisers. "I am now incredibly saddened that those same people have now not only manufactured allegations of apparent intimidation and bullying on young volunteers by my team, but made them public."

Electoral boundaries

The party acknowledged to The Canadian Press that they have no evidence that Innes personally was involved.

The problems stem from the new electoral boundaries drawn for the October 2015 election. The riding of Trinity Spadina will be split between Fort York-Spadina and University-Rosedale, leaving whoever wins the byelection to replace Chow having to find a different riding in which to run next year.

"Stephen Harper is 'Exhibit A' of what happens when a leader compromises on his democratic principles in order to win power. I feel it important to speak up as forcefully as I can so that the party I care about doesn't go down the same road," Paikin said in his statement.

"Blocking nomination bids is what creates the party-wide toxicity we seek to avoid."


"Oh, what a tangled web we weave," and all that.

I don't think M. Trudeau set out to deceive us when he made his open nominations promise. I think he just deceived himself.
 
Reproduced, without further (written) comment, under the Fair Dealing provisions of the Copyright Act from the Globe and Mail:

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-debate/a-trudeau-autobiography-already-in-this-age-doesnt-matter/article17724818/#dashboard/follows/
gam-masthead.png

A Trudeau autobiography already? In this, age doesn’t matter

ELIZABETH RENZETTI
The Globe and Mail

Published Saturday, Mar. 29 2014

Haters, as a wise philosopher once observed to his followers, gonna hate. By this token, a fair number of eyebrows were raised at the news that Justin Trudeau, merely 42, will publish his memoirs later this year. You have to wonder if he’s done enough living, apart from half a decade in Parliament and an MA in Twitter. Is this a case of premature autobiography? I believe there’s a pill for that.

Perhaps the Liberal Party Leader could look for comfort to a fellow Canadian – who happens to share not only his name but also his impressively bouncy locks:

“A lot of people think I was an overnight success, but that wouldn’t be exactly true. Sure, it’s only been five years, but it has also been a lot of hard work that took time, sacrifice and relentless dedication.”

See? No one thought Justin Bieber should be writing his memoirs, either, and he managed to publish two by the time he was 18 (the quote above is taken from his 2012 memoir). And Mr. Bieber wasn’t even the leader of one of Canada’s main political parties or scion of one of its most famous political families. He’s just a kid with a lot of gold records and impressive aim when peeing in a bucket, but by 18 he’d published two volumes of his pensées, titled First Step 2 Forever and Just Getting Started.

It is a small tragedy that those titles are already taken. So, apparently, is Bossy Pantsuit, which Hillary Clinton jokingly said would be the name of her forthcoming memoir. It’s a funny old coincidence that the second volume of her autobiography will be coming out this year, just as everyone expects her to prepare for an election campaign, and Mr. Trudeau’s will be released in the fall, a year before Canada’s federal election. What crazy timing! It’s a good thing his publisher has promised a “candid” biography, and not one of those book-shaped things that are mainly just a hunk of campaign slogan slapped between two slices of platitude.

When you think of it, the majority of political memoirs fall into one of two categories: bridge-building (when the career is on the rise) or grudge-settling (after the bridge has collapsed). The latter is obviously more fun, but it’s in the former where Mr. Trudeau will find lessons for the canny political memoirist:

Admit failure. Okay, maybe Mr. Trudeau’s joke about Ukraine wasn’t so funny, and that comment about admiring China was impolitic (brave, but impolitic). No matter; it could have been much worse. Listen to Barack Obama, writing about his crushing 2000 congressional defeat in his memoir The Audacity of Hope: “My own mistakes were compounded by tragedy and farce.” His approval rating at the beginning of his campaign was 8 per cent, which suggests the idiocy of hope more than anything else. His opponent’s son was murdered during the campaign. Mr. Obama lost that race by 31 points, but we all know where he ended up. Everyone loves a (temporary) loser. There are always exceptions, of course: Richard Nixon wrote 1,000 pages of memoir, RN, without admitting blame for his downfall. Minima culpa is its own category.

Have an epiphany while running. No one has a blinding realization about his political destiny while sitting on the couch watching The Bachelor. At the beginning of Olivia Chow’s new memoir, My Journey, she is at the end of a five-kilometre run when she thinks, “Canadians are generous; we believe we can create a fair and balanced society. So how can we come together to form a government that reflects our values?” In The Audacity of Hope, Mr. Obama’s run takes him up the steps of the Lincoln Memorial: “I think about America and those who built it. … My heart is filled with love for this country.” Both Ms. Chow and Mr. Obama were preparing to run for office when their books came out. It’s a metaphor that works. Run with it.

Embrace your inner hedonist. Mr. Trudeau drew flak for admitting he’d smoked pot at a dinner party, which hardly makes him the Courtney Love of the political scene. It barely qualifies him to be mayor of Toronto. Look at the confessional precedents: “I have enjoyed the company of women,” Senator Edward Kennedy wrote in his memoir, True Compass. “I have enjoyed a stiff drink or two or three.” In A Journey (not to be confused with My Journey, see above), Tony Blair worried that 10 Downing St. had turned him into a tosspot: “Stiff whisky or G&T before dinner, couple of glasses of wine or even half a bottle with it. [Alcohol] had become a prop.”

Of course, these confessions could hardly hurt their authors: Mr. Kennedy was dying when he wrote his book, and Mr. Blair found religion after publishing his. What voter these days is really going to care if a politician has taken an illicit puff here or there? Hell, in some parts of the country it’s a path to re-election.

In the end, it doesn’t really matter how old the storyteller. What matters is the freshness of the tale.


tumblr_lyybk3AplD1r36hx4.gif
 
In any serious party, the fact that the leader is unable to explain what is "middle class" (despite making a stand on helping the "middle class" and being asked three separate times by three separate reporters), expresses admiration for the Chinese communist system of government and makes really inappropriate remarks about the Russian invasion of Ukraine (to name the most recent series of gaffes) should be enough to give everyone pause.

Do the Liberals even have anyone on the bench who might be able to step in? Or for that matter, if the Young Dauphin isn't able to pull out of third place in the next general election (especially if it turns into a cage match in Quebec), who might be waiting in the wings to replace him?
 
It's only one poll, but CROP is pretty authoritative in Quebec ... La Press reports that "Le constat le plus troublant pour le Parti libéral est que ses appuis chez les électeurs francophones fondent comme neige au soleil." (The most disturbing finding for the Liberal Party is that its support among francophone voters is melting like snow in the sun.) The Liberals are polling at only 24% amongst French speakers, well below the NDP at 38%. That (38%) is below the 42.9% of the vote the NDP got in 2011 and the Liberals are well up from the 14.2% that they got in QC in 2011 but it appears to indicate that M. Trudeau's massive popularity in English Canada doesn't cross the linguistic divide. Given that his route to power must (my guesstimate) include displacing Thomas Mulcair's NDP in Quebec, this poll is bad news.
 
Former Liberal MP Jim Karygiannis was not everyone's idea of the modern, sophisticated, 21st century professional politician, but he served long and, in his own way, loyally, and now he is out in public dissing Justin Trudeau and the Liberal Party according to this article which is reproduced under the Fair Dealing provisions of the Copyright Act from the Globe and Mail:

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/globe-politics-insider/long-time-mp-karygiannis-this-is-not-the-same-liberal-party-we-knew/article18308492/#dashboard/follows/?click=drive
gam-masthead.png

Long-time MP Karygiannis: ‘This is not the same Liberal Party we knew’

SUBSCRIBERS ONLY

Joe Friesen
The Globe and Mail

Published Monday, Apr. 28 2014

Jim Karygiannis is settled at a table at the back of a Greek restaurant on the Danforth in Toronto. After more than 25 years as a Liberal MP and as one of the few to avoid the Conservative sweep incursion into Toronto suburbs in 2011, Mr. Karygiannis retired earlier this month.

He is in an expansive mood, willing to discuss everything from the changing nature of the party to its leadership failings and his experience as a party point man for ethnic politics.

“I’m the last samurai,” he says almost immediately.

He explains that the samurai are the warriors, the organizers, the people who get things done. Once upon a time the Liberals had a whole clan of samurai, he says.

“Joe Volpe, Maurizio Bevilacqua, Sergio Marchi, myself and Denis Coderre,” he says. “There are very few people who have the capability to organize and help others to get elected.”

Mr. Karygiannis’s Scarborough riding was always one of the most ethnically diverse in the House of Commons. As a result, he gained a certain profile in the party because of his links with some ethnic groups and his willingness to lobby on their behalf.

In recent years he had been the party’s point man on ethnic politics and multiculturalism, a role he took great pride in. But that changed when Justin Trudeau became leader and he was reassigned to veterans affairs. It also happened to coincide with the period when he started to feel unhappy about life in Ottawa.

“When he became leader I had a white paper, a vision, the way forward to 2030. I spoke about it in caucus. I wanted to send it to him. Never got a response,” Mr. Karygiannis said. “Ethnic politics is not about the food and the dance and ‘It’s great to be Greek.’ It’s about making sure that people from a community have a voice at the cabinet table and engaging the second generation.”

Mr. Karygiannis expresses no hostility toward Mr. Trudeau, just a feeling that the lessons of the past are being ignored. Referring to the ugly nomination battle in Trinity-Spadina, in which one candidate was barred despite a promise to hold open contests, Mr. Karygiannis said “This is not the same Liberal Party we knew. The party has changed.”

Politics in Canada in many cases is about communities, he said. You have to build relationships with those communities if you expect to win. He runs phone banks in 15 languages, prints brochures in 18 languages. He keeps a database that includes a category for ethnicity on everybody in his riding and a record of every interaction they’ve had with his office and every statement of voting intention during canvassing over 25 years. He has a database of 217 ethnic community celebrations, anniversaries and holidays on which to release statements.

“If the Liberals are going to come back, we have to come back to basics. Unfortunately we lost touch,” he said. “You can’t take communities for granted. The Conservatives, to their benefit, Jason Kenney is able to understand the sense of community.”

“Our party right now, although I tried very hard to move in that direction, we’re moving away from it again.”

The current Liberal thinking is more like “everybody under one pot,” he said.

“The Conservatives saw the differences. To his credit Mr. Kenney used it. They issue press releases to send messages to the community and away they go,” he said.

The decline of the Liberal party has been painful for Mr. Karygiannis, he said. There are so many reasons for it, but one important one is the neglect of the basic work of politics: listening to constituents.

“Unfortunately a lot of my colleagues do not link themselves to the voters,” he said. “Remember when the Tamils were up on the bridges. I was the only guy that went to see them. I was the only guy that spoke to them. If I need something from the Tamils, they’re there.”

The other reasons for the party’s decline?

“Leadership certainly has something to do with it. [Stephane] Dion, a great individual, but not a political bone in his fricking body. [Michael] Ignatieff…He hijacked the party. Arrogant.

“If you wanted to speak to Ignatieff you had to write a letter to Peter Donolo, his chief of staff, saying why you wanted to speak to him. I said ‘What, do you live in an ivory tower? I’m a Member of Parliament for the Liberal Party and I’m a member of your caucus.’”

After Mr. Ignatieff lost his own seat in the 2011 election Mr. Karygiannis made a point of reminding him that only one of them was returned by the voters. Mr. Ignatieff simply walked away, he said.

Mr. Karygiannis provided some insight, too, on the Liberal leadership battles that gripped the party during the Chretien-Martin years. Mr. Karygiannis had been a backbencher from 1993 to 2001 but had done a lot of the dirty work to get Jean Chretien elected leader in 1990. He recalled one of his great triumphs, signing up 20 Punjabi migrant workers on a farm near Lindsay, Ont., one night to seal a delegate nomination meeting at the very last second. They had to be living in Canada, not necessarily Canadian, he explained.

The trick in the nomination meetings was to ensure that if a riding was selecting 12 delegates, that your delegates were the first 12 names on the ballot, he explained. You had to get there very early to make sure. That way voters who knew nothing of what was going on, the instant Liberals that the organizers had signed up, could be told to simply mark the first 12 boxes, rather than having to worry about a dozen names scattered on a ballot. It took months for the Paul Martin camp to figure out a counter move, Mr. Karygiannis said.

“Robocalls?” he laughs. “We were practising robocalls back in the 80s.”

There may have been a few Martin supporters who got the wrong directions to the polls. And then there was an incident in which he was accused of putting chewing gum in a payphone coin slot, thus preventing his opponents from contacting their voters. Mr. Karygiannis won’t talk about it on the record.

When it came time to collect a political reward, though, Mr. Chretien didn’t come through for him.

“I went to Chretien in 2001 and I said ‘Boss, I’ve been at this 13 years, do you think I could get something else? I mean I want a challenge.’ He put his foot up on his desk and he said ‘Jim, the boys don’t think you’re ready.’ I said ‘thank you,’ and walked out. I met Martin the next week. He asked me a couple questions and I said I’m there,” Mr. Karygiannis recalled.

In short order he signed up 5,000 families to back Mr. Martin’s side in the leadership review. Then as the leadership battles intensified, Mr. Karygiannis told Mr. Chretien that he ought to resign “with grace and dignity.” Shortly after, Mr. Chretien announced he would retire.

“I was looking for a parliamentary secretary, frankly, and [Chretien] had rotated everybody except one or two of us…What the hell am I? Chicken feed? The boys didn’t think I was ready? The other boys thought I was ready.

“One of the things I wanted to do was get the title Honourable in front of my name, so that at least when I drop dead the flag will go at half-mast and there’ll be two Mounties at my funeral. That’s good for my family.”

Mr.  will run for Toronto City Council in Ward 39, roughly half the size of his old Scarborough Agincourt riding. He hopes to be a diversity advocate on council.

Joe Friesen reports on demographics from Toronto.


I think there are lessons in the Liberals' (and the Conservatives' and NDP's) culture wars. They are not new: the Liberals have been riven with dissent since the mid 1960s when the party accepted the output of the Kingston Conference (1960) and lurched left. The Conservatives had them between the small town Ontario Conservatives of George Drew and the prairie populists behind John Deifenbaker and then, indeed now, between the old Progressive Conservatives and the Reform Conservatives. It was not easy for Jack Layton and, now, Thomas Mulcair to drag the NDP's loony lefties towards (no all the way to) the political centre.

I think M. Trudeau is making a fundamental error in thinking that his own celebrity equals permanent political popularity and I think he has decided that celebrity candidates like Chrystia Freeland and Andrew Leslie have some value because of their celebrity status. Mr Karygiannis is sending an important message: stick close to the grass-roots, look after the communities (remember, the very origins of our democracy are community based ~ the French title of our House of Commons, Chambre des communes, is, actually, more accurate, it is a house that represents the people in their communities) and represent the ordinary people, which is something the NDP's David Lewis understood, way back when, and  which Conservative Minister Jason Kenney understands, today.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top