dapaterson said:On the other hand, eight hours driving (round trip) plus a couple hours training means you will be tired and less able to deliver the Army training you are paid to do. If your weekly road trips impact your ability to do your job, expect to have restrictions introduced by your chain of command.
dapaterson said:What slippery slope? If extracurriculars detract from your ability to do the job you are paid to do, then choose one or the other.
ballz said:What's next, mandatory bed time?
Pusser said:Refs: QR&O 16.01
CBI 209.54
Not true. Reimbursement of expenses for recall from leave simply requires that the member be on leave (weekend leave counts). There is no requirement for a signed leave pass in order to claim expenses resulting from being recalled on a weekend. If a member wants to go from Halifax to Vancouver for the weekend and the CO decides that he needs him back before Monday morning, then the unit has to pay.
ballz said:There is one hole in this, however. Without a leave pass for said weekend trips, what if your leave is cancelled on Thursday and now you have incurred expenses as a result? How can you claim reimbursement of expenses?
We are discussing this issue in my unit now. We know what the leave manual states. However, we have the problem of 1. maintaining our mandated readiness as the unit that currently has the NEO task, and 2. protecting the troops interest if their leave is cancelled.
While I'm usually pretty straight and narrow about the CoC adding in paperwork, red tape, etc etc over stupid s**t, I very much see the utility in having the troops fill out a leave pass for weekend leave if they are going outside the geographical area, utility for both the CoC and the soldier. Not for the purpose of "hey, you he didn't have a leave pass to be in Halifax his weekend... CSM, conduct a UDI."
Harrigan said:I'm with Ballz on this one.
Most of the units I have been in followed the simple principle of the supervisor keeping a signed but blank leave pass in the bottom drawer - one for each subordinate. In the event of something happening while on weekend leave without a pass, said supervisor can decide based on the situation whether to fill in the particulars (for, say, a compassionate case), or not (for, say, Bloggins flying off to Vegas without a leave pass and getting in a fight). In both cases, supervisor can then sort out any 'remedial measures' in-house.
Pusser said:Some of the most frequently successful charges I've seen at courts martial are those concerning the falsification of documents...
Harrigan said:You are assuming a nefarious intent of some sort. The intent of a leave pass is to show one is on leave, no?
The only times I have seen it used was in a compassionate-type case. It is still incumbent upon the member to ensure that the supervisor is aware/approves that he/she is going away on leave, but sometimes there are situations where it just doesn't make sense to force the member to drive into the office to fill out a piece of paper at 2am on a Sunday, then try to find a supervisor to sign it (at 2am) when they need to get on a plane or drive wherever.
If it is a Vegas situation, nothing would be done and the member gets charged with AWOL. Pretty simple.
Pusser said:Fair enough, but such a thing is open to abuse. By the same token, leave passes can be signed in arrears as well
George Wallace said:Really? Try that when a legal issue is the question. I think that would bite you very deeply in the ***.
Pusser said:Fair enough, but such a thing is open to abuse. By the same token, leave passes can be signed in arrears as well