daftandbarmy
Army.ca Dinosaur
- Reaction score
- 32,237
- Points
- 1,160
Give us 40 more Leo 2s, 48 K9s, and 24 MSHORAD and we’re about there. Who’s going to man that is a whole other kettle of fish
Give us 40 more Leo 2s, 48 K9s, and 24 MSHORAD and we’re about there. Who’s going to man that is a whole other kettle of fish
Who calls people hipsters anymore ? Dating yourself mate
Who calls people hipsters anymore ? Dating yourself mate
Oh interesting; can you point out some different TTPs they’ve developed ?
In the trenches, fields and streets around the Ukrainian city of Bakhmut, Ukrainian tanks are delivering brutal strikes on Russian troops, but not in direct face-to-face combat. Instead, the old T-64 tanks are being used as indirect artillery, with targeting handled by drones or combat helicopters.
Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty filmed some of the tank crews utilizing their armor to bolster Ukrainian artillery. It’s a combined arms tactic that is netting successful strikes, even as both sides fail to break through the other’s lines. If Russians try to target the tanks, they move to a different position and resume barrages.
Does this qualify?
Ukraine is using its old tanks as artillery amid trench warfare in Bakhmut
“It gives you an extra nudge. You see what you’ve done, that you have helped the infantry, and you just want to keep on going."taskandpurpose.com
How about citizens that engaged the Russians with 3 days of "training"? Did they have time to absorb ANY TTPs?
Sections equipped with an assortment of Javelins, NLAWs, Panzerfaust 3s, Matadors, AT4s, CG84s, M72s, RPG7s, RPG22s, Stingers, Starstreaks, Martlets, Milans, etc. Using whatever they can get ahold of to kill whatever is in front of them.
60mm mortar crews using DJIA drones to launch artillery raids. Was that in a pam somewhere? Printing plastic fins to screw onto anti-tank grenades that were jerry-rigged to drop from DJIA drones into trenches, chimneys and hatches.
SU-27s launching HARM missiles. Brimstones launched from trucks. Pickup trucks with HMGs, Autocannons and 70 to 120mm rockets and missiles.
Artillery raids rather than barrages. Small units of guns, employed with precision and short bursts of fire.
Naval drones.
Some of this is no doubt in some manual somewhere but we can't deny that the Ukrainians have shown an extraordinary propensity for innovation and little tendency to be bound by rule books.
Tanks have been firing indirect since WW2, aerial spotters have existed since the advent of military aviation. Even our Tac Hel pilots train to adjust fires.
Are we resorting to this for a three day old post ? Obviously armed civilians raised as temporary militias are going to be operating differently. My understanding is they were being led by active soldiers ?
We’re they equipped at section level ? Do you assume there was no control of the issue of those weapons and it was just a max scramble to push stuff out ? Probably in February / March but certainly less so now.
Are you honestly asking if using UAVs to sport for artillery is something no one else has done ?
For the record ISIS was doing the home made grenade thing nearly a decade ago.
I think assuming they aren’t operating with some kind of TTP, or structure, is frankly absurd. They’re creating some improvised equipment to cover gaps from losses, the system remains unchanged. Of course TTPs are going to adapt in a conflict; but those improvised vehicles and weapons get a disproportionate amount of attention because the people reporting want clicks.
China is the largest threat to our nation likely since the US decided they wanted us to be part of them.It’s be like any other conflict; we’ll piggy back of the US. I don’t disagree about the ability to deploying being different; but we’ve also send under equipped forces to Asia in the name of expediency in our past and we should learn from that mistake.
I don’t see much threat of Chinese military expansion, but that’s just me.
There are some pretty decent FCS out there now that allow for direct and indirect fire without the need for the C2 sight - and the issues of teaching folks how to lay the system and record aiming marks etc.Video of Aussie DFSW Platoon
Sustained Fire Systems - MAG 58 - 7.62, M2 - 12.7, M47 - 40, all mounting C2 sights for direct and indirect fire.
Anti-Armour systems - CG-84 M3/4 with AT,HE and Ill rounds as well as Javelin
There are some pretty decent FCS out there now that allow for direct and indirect fire without the need for the C2 sight - and the issues of teaching folks how to lay the system and record aiming marks etc.
I'm a big fan of knowing the analog systems - but being able to do it in the dark in seconds without any pre-registering is a nice add that the new stuff allows.
Sort of, there are some much more expensive and advanced systems though -- and just like the Aimpoint FCS you wouldn't want to put them on rifles or MG's though - the nature of those means bulky beast.Like the types of things Saab has been hanging from their CG84s that can also be employed on MGs and rifles?
FCS™ | Aimpoint
www.aimpoint.com
Sort of, there are some much more expensive and advanced systems though -- and just like the Aimpoint FCS you wouldn't want to put them on rifles or MG's though - the nature of those means bulky beast.
It is if you want to change belts or barrels easily...Is that as major problem for a Support Platoon Weapon, firing from fixed positions, as it is for assaulters?
On that topic, did we ever get the FCS on the C16 CASW Automatic Grenade Launcher to work? When I left the field force it was still incapable of registering targets — a bracket for a C2 sight would have been an upgrade.There are some pretty decent FCS out there now that allow for direct and indirect fire without the need for the C2 sight - and the issues of teaching folks how to lay the system and record aiming marks etc.
I'm a big fan of knowing the analog systems - but being able to do it in the dark in seconds without any pre-registering is a nice add that the new stuff allows.
Not for a 240/C6 or smaller.FCS 12 Aimpoint on Carl Gustaf
FCS 12 on 40mm AGL
FCS 12 on M2HB
The FCS 12 is the earlier generation of the FCS 13 RE.
10th MTN Soldiers learn how to use new ITWS on M3 Carl Gustaf
FORT BELVOIR, Virginia -- Soldiers of the 10th Mountain Division (Light Infantry) had first-hand experience in August using the latest aiming technology innovation that makes the Army's recoilless rifle even deadlier.New Equipment Trainers of Proje.....www.army.mil
Seems that a little bit of bulk is tolerable if it improves effects.
No idea. Which one did the CAF get?On that topic, did we ever get the FCS on the C16 CASW Automatic Grenade Launcher to work? When I left the field force it was still incapable of registering targets — a bracket for a C2 sight would have been an upgrade.
It works ish it’s just a really shit system in that it doesn’t give you like a pip to put the cross hairs on. Given the weight and bulk of that FCS it doesn’t come out on ex much. Mind you neither does the C16.On that topic, did we ever get the FCS on the C16 CASW Automatic Grenade Launcher to work? When I left the field force it was still incapable of registering targets — a bracket for a C2 sight would have been an upgrade.
It works ish it’s just a really shit system in that it doesn’t give you like a pip to put the cross hairs on. Given the weight and bulk of that FCS it doesn’t come out on ex much. Mind you neither does the C16.