• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

If You Really Support The Troops

ruxted

Member
Inactive
Reaction score
0
Points
210
Link To Original Article On Ruxted.ca

If You Really Support The Troops

If you really support the troops …

Frankly, The Ruxted Group is getting tired of admonitions, especially from politicians, to “Support the troops!”

Most Canadians do support the troops – even those who disagree with how the government employs them. If there is any lack of support it seems to be amongst those doing most of the talking in Ottawa.

If our elected leaders really want to support the troops then Ruxted has a few suggestions:

First: Get more troops. There are too few sailors, soldiers and air force personnel. This is evidenced by ships tied up for lack of crews, the terrible machinations required for army ‘force generation’ and chronic shortages of aircrew. We need thousands, indeed tens of thousands of new people – above the current manpower ceilings – in all three services but, above all, in the army’s combat units.

There are serious impediments to getting more people:

• Money. The government could have allocated additional funding for personnel in the latest budget; it did not – so much for supporting the troops;

• Bureaucracy. Equally, the government has failed to remove some of the administrative impediments which make it difficult for reserve soldiers to transfer into the regular force; and

• Inertia. The government failed to vote new money or remove policies which impede the all important issue of retention.

Second: Get more equipment. This government and its immediate predecessor are both to be commended for providing some new money for equipment and streamlining the procurement process for some new systems for the current mission. But more, much more needs to be done – for this mission and the next, and the next, and the ones after them.

Gen. Hillier was not being hyperbolic when he spoke about a “decade of darkness” – Prime Minister Jean Chrétien, during his 12+ years in power, was only slightly less destructive of our national security and defence than was Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau who came very close to disarming Canada by stealth. Sadly, Prime Minister Brian Mulroney had neither the will, nor the wherewithal to correct the policy vandalism..

While The Ruxted Group understands that defence procurement is always a mix of unpopular politics (spending money on anything other than social programmes) and political pork-barrelling (delivering contracts to this or that riding as either a reward or a bribe, we encourage politicians who want to “support the troops” to show a little responsibility and provide more money and simplified procurement regulations which will get useful quantities of suitable new equipment into the hands of those troops.

While Ruxted understands and supports the competitive procurement process, it doesn't always work in the small, well defined world of military hardware. Buying, on a sole source basis, off the shelf, proven products such as the C-17, the C130J and the M777 howitzer makes sense when Canada's own professional military experts confirm, to parliament, that there is only one acceptable choice in the market. This could apply to other systems as well.

Finally: Stop using the troops as political props, photo ops and whipping boys. Most Canadians, even those who disagree with why we are in Afghanistan and how we are conducting operations there, have nothing but good will, the best of will for the people in our armed forces. Most Canadians are quite able to “support the troops” even as they oppose the government of the day. It is politicians who seem unable to grasp the simple fact that the “troops” serve all Canadians, equally, because they – above all others – represent all Canadians, equally. The men and women in the Canadian Forces signed on to be used, as tools, to advance the policies of the elected Government of Canada; they did not sign on to be tools in election campaigns or props in political theatrics. The Ruxted Group deplores the increase in the partisan use and abuse of our military by politicians of all stripes.

Canadians do “support the troops” and the troops support Canada. It is time for politicians to put our money where their (too busy) mouths are and practice what they preach.


Shared in accordance with the "fair dealing" provisions, Section 29, of the Copyright Act - http://www.cb-cda.gc.ca/info/act-e.html#rid-33409
 
Hear, Hear.

I look at my own corps and can see the damage caused to the troops from the lack of troops.  Look at your average engineer Sgt and you'll see a guy with a rack of medals that puts most WW2 veterans to shame (at least in number, if not intensity).  They've been on the 1 year on, 2 years off schedule for 15 years now (and sometimes faster than that even).  It's a wonder that any engineers can keep families.

Using a couple of simple ratios it's easy to demonstrate just how much bigger we should be.  First is the oft quoted defence spending as % of GDP, where we rate up around Liechtenstein, which has little better than a robust police force.  Other ratios: we have half the population of Britain, and less than one third of the infantry battalions (33 vs. 10), most of ours under strength, and theirs to full strength after a series of amalgamations.  Bottom line, our army needs to be about double the size it is now in order to be able to take on the roles that the government wants us to.  Our air force and navy are in an even more precarious position, where they barely have ANY combat capability.

As for the Res-Reg component transfer issue- the CLS took that one on by simply bypassing the recruiting system.  A recent CANFORGEN confirmed that all reservists recently back from an Op Tour will get a 3 year short engagement, at their current rank, and that the process for doing it runs through the career managers, not the recruiting system.  Frankly, this is a wise suggestion, since it's the career managers who own their trades, not the recruiting system, which can barely keep up on taking in fresh faces from the street.  Now, as for the evisceration of the reserves that this could cause...


As for the equipment issue- our current state comes from having taken the European approach, in which maintaining a military force has become an employment program.  The overwhelming need of any equipment purchase has become to direct federal money to particular regions, not to get the equipment itself.  Frankly, I'm of the opinion that we just decide to find another army (US or UK) and equip ourselves identically for our major items.  Buy off the shelf and then negotiate the maintenance contracts to be handled within Canada (within the regions).  Saves time, and money for all concerned, and makes us more inter-operable with those forces that we work with regularly.
 
Saves time, and money for all concerned, and makes us more interoperable with those forces that we work with regularly.

The main country/force we need to be able to be inter operateable with is the US. By way of geographic location and political bent, we actually are closer to the US than even the UK.
 
"Buy proven hardware of the shelf" That's what many of us have been saying for years. If we had of done this years ago we wouldn't be in such a predicament now. But hey, the smart ones with the big college degrees are in Ottawa, ya right...

I think it will take at least a generation to dig ourselves out of the hole the government put us in. Unless Ottawa starts spending some serious money, it's never going to happen.
 
Back
Top